FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2004193886> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2004193886 endingPage "363" @default.
• W2004193886 startingPage "356" @default.
• W2004193886 abstract "Statement of problem Although surfactant-modified vinyl polysiloxane (VPS) is described as hydrophilic by manufacturers, interaction with dental gypsum is relatively poor. Purpose The purpose of this study was to compare and evaluate the wettability of surfactant-modified VPS after different surface treatments. Material and methods Eighty-four impression-material specimens (20 × 10 × 1 mm) were prepared from 3 different brands of VPS (Aquasil, Panasil Contact Plus, and Accuflex). Four groups (n = 7) of specimens were established according to the surface treatment method used: no treatment, topical application of 2 different surface wettability agents (Silwet Copolymer L-77 or Delar surfactant), or coating with an acrylic acid plasma in a glow-discharge reactor. Plasma treatment specimens were coated with acrylic acid in a glow-discharge system at a radio frequency of 13.56 MHz with 20-W discharge power and 5 minutes of exposure time. Wettability was measured using the contact-angle method. Values were recorded after the drop contacted the surface at 0.6 second, 30.7 seconds, and 210.8 seconds. Contact-angle mean values were compared using 3-way analysis of variance with repeated measures on 1 factor, followed by a post hoc Duncan test (α=.05). Results As the sphericity assumption was not satisfied, the Greenhouse-Geisser correction was used for contact-angle values. Glow-discharge treatment proved to be effective for increasing the surface energy of the VPS compared to controls at all time points studied (P<.0001). At 0.6 second, Silwet significantly decreased the contact-angle values for Aquasil and for Panasil Contact Plus (P<.0001). Delar treatment, at this time point, significantly increased the contact-angle values of GC (P<.0001) and decreased the contact-angle values of Aquasil (P<.0001). At 30.7 seconds, Silwet significantly increased the wettability of Aquasil and Panasil Contact Plus (P<.0001) but did not significantly increase the wettability of GC. Delar treatment, at 30.7 seconds, increased the contact-angle values of GC (P<.0001), whereas contact-angle values of Aquasil significantly decreased (P<.0001). At 210.8 seconds, all surface-modification methods used were effective in increasing the wettability of VPS tested over untreated controls (P<.0001). Conclusion Wettability of VPS-based impression materials can be increased by coating the surface with acrylic acid in a glow-discharge reactor. The change in wettability achieved by the application of topical surfactants resulted in variations among surfactant-VPS combinations. Although surfactant-modified vinyl polysiloxane (VPS) is described as hydrophilic by manufacturers, interaction with dental gypsum is relatively poor. The purpose of this study was to compare and evaluate the wettability of surfactant-modified VPS after different surface treatments. Eighty-four impression-material specimens (20 × 10 × 1 mm) were prepared from 3 different brands of VPS (Aquasil, Panasil Contact Plus, and Accuflex). Four groups (n = 7) of specimens were established according to the surface treatment method used: no treatment, topical application of 2 different surface wettability agents (Silwet Copolymer L-77 or Delar surfactant), or coating with an acrylic acid plasma in a glow-discharge reactor. Plasma treatment specimens were coated with acrylic acid in a glow-discharge system at a radio frequency of 13.56 MHz with 20-W discharge power and 5 minutes of exposure time. Wettability was measured using the contact-angle method. Values were recorded after the drop contacted the surface at 0.6 second, 30.7 seconds, and 210.8 seconds. Contact-angle mean values were compared using 3-way analysis of variance with repeated measures on 1 factor, followed by a post hoc Duncan test (α=.05). As the sphericity assumption was not satisfied, the Greenhouse-Geisser correction was used for contact-angle values. Glow-discharge treatment proved to be effective for increasing the surface energy of the VPS compared to controls at all time points studied (P<.0001). At 0.6 second, Silwet significantly decreased the contact-angle values for Aquasil and for Panasil Contact Plus (P<.0001). Delar treatment, at this time point, significantly increased the contact-angle values of GC (P<.0001) and decreased the contact-angle values of Aquasil (P<.0001). At 30.7 seconds, Silwet significantly increased the wettability of Aquasil and Panasil Contact Plus (P<.0001) but did not significantly increase the wettability of GC. Delar treatment, at 30.7 seconds, increased the contact-angle values of GC (P<.0001), whereas contact-angle values of Aquasil significantly decreased (P<.0001). At 210.8 seconds, all surface-modification methods used were effective in increasing the wettability of VPS tested over untreated controls (P<.0001). Wettability of VPS-based impression materials can be increased by coating the surface with acrylic acid in a glow-discharge reactor. The change in wettability achieved by the application of topical surfactants resulted in variations among surfactant-VPS combinations." @default.
• W2004193886 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2004193886 creator A5061746346 @default.
• W2004193886 creator A5085341011 @default.
• W2004193886 date "2005-04-01" @default.
• W2004193886 modified "2023-10-15" @default.
• W2004193886 title "Effects of glow-discharge and surfactant treatments on the wettability of vinyl polysiloxane impression materials" @default.
• W2004193886 cites W1978380502 @default.
• W2004193886 cites W1986203223 @default.
• W2004193886 cites W1987524891 @default.
• W2004193886 cites W2000027181 @default.
• W2004193886 cites W2016126084 @default.
• W2004193886 cites W2024710127 @default.
• W2004193886 cites W2038056368 @default.
• W2004193886 cites W2076964156 @default.
• W2004193886 cites W2078817180 @default.
• W2004193886 cites W2081140104 @default.
• W2004193886 cites W2095464718 @default.
• W2004193886 cites W2163694838 @default.
• W2004193886 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.01.014" @default.
• W2004193886 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15798686" @default.
• W2004193886 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
• W2004193886 type Work @default.
• W2004193886 sameAs 2004193886 @default.
• W2004193886 citedByCount "9" @default.
• W2004193886 countsByYear W20041938862013 @default.
• W2004193886 countsByYear W20041938862018 @default.
• W2004193886 countsByYear W20041938862022 @default.
• W2004193886 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2004193886 hasAuthorship W2004193886A5061746346 @default.
• W2004193886 hasAuthorship W2004193886A5085341011 @default.
• W2004193886 hasConcept C112698675 @default.
• W2004193886 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2004193886 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2004193886 hasConcept C134514944 @default.
• W2004193886 hasConcept C13965031 @default.
• W2004193886 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2004193886 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W2004193886 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2004193886 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2004193886 hasConcept C195839 @default.
• W2004193886 hasConcept C2776595061 @default.
• W2004193886 hasConcept C2776684213 @default.
• W2004193886 hasConcept C42360764 @default.
• W2004193886 hasConcept C54517805 @default.
• W2004193886 hasConcept C58226133 @default.
• W2004193886 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W2004193886 hasConcept C6556556 @default.
• W2004193886 hasConcept C82706917 @default.
• W2004193886 hasConceptScore W2004193886C112698675 @default.
• W2004193886 hasConceptScore W2004193886C121332964 @default.
• W2004193886 hasConceptScore W2004193886C127413603 @default.
• W2004193886 hasConceptScore W2004193886C134514944 @default.
• W2004193886 hasConceptScore W2004193886C13965031 @default.
• W2004193886 hasConceptScore W2004193886C144133560 @default.
• W2004193886 hasConceptScore W2004193886C159985019 @default.
• W2004193886 hasConceptScore W2004193886C185592680 @default.
• W2004193886 hasConceptScore W2004193886C192562407 @default.
• W2004193886 hasConceptScore W2004193886C195839 @default.
• W2004193886 hasConceptScore W2004193886C2776595061 @default.
• W2004193886 hasConceptScore W2004193886C2776684213 @default.
• W2004193886 hasConceptScore W2004193886C42360764 @default.
• W2004193886 hasConceptScore W2004193886C54517805 @default.
• W2004193886 hasConceptScore W2004193886C58226133 @default.
• W2004193886 hasConceptScore W2004193886C62520636 @default.
• W2004193886 hasConceptScore W2004193886C6556556 @default.
• W2004193886 hasConceptScore W2004193886C82706917 @default.
• W2004193886 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2004193886 hasLocation W20041938861 @default.
• W2004193886 hasLocation W20041938862 @default.
• W2004193886 hasOpenAccess W2004193886 @default.
• W2004193886 hasPrimaryLocation W20041938861 @default.
• W2004193886 hasRelatedWork W1990348226 @default.
• W2004193886 hasRelatedWork W1998237538 @default.
• W2004193886 hasRelatedWork W2018930861 @default.
• W2004193886 hasRelatedWork W2074311622 @default.
• W2004193886 hasRelatedWork W2074503678 @default.
• W2004193886 hasRelatedWork W2186304644 @default.
• W2004193886 hasRelatedWork W2255593446 @default.
• W2004193886 hasRelatedWork W2315671387 @default.
• W2004193886 hasRelatedWork W2768806995 @default.
• W2004193886 hasRelatedWork W4232679949 @default.
• W2004193886 hasVolume "93" @default.
• W2004193886 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2004193886 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2004193886 magId "2004193886" @default.
• W2004193886 workType "article" @default.