FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2004249990> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2004249990 endingPage "19" @default.
• W2004249990 startingPage "1" @default.
• W2004249990 abstract "ABSTRACT Purpose. The purpose of this research is to develop a theory-based model of alliance failure with a specific focus on alliance lifecycle phases that have, for the most part, been ignored in extant literature. The fundamental premise of this research is that alliances fail because decisions (not) made by managers “set up” alliances for failure long before an alliance is formed (i.e., in the strategic planning stage and partner evaluation and selection stage) and long after an alliance should have been terminated (i.e., the termination stage). It is posited that some factors may lead to alliance failure but have no influence on alliance success. Furthermore, it is suggested here that by focusing on failure, managers may be able to take steps to correct and prevent future alliance failures. Methodology/Approach. This is a theoretically based conceptual paper. Empirically testable propositions are developed. Findings. Following the theory posited in this paper, one may draw the following conclusions: Top managers must be careful to develop strategic alliances that are associated directly with the strategic needs of the company. That is, make your alliances fit your strategy, not your strategy fit your alliances. Top managers should prioritize alliances based on strategic needs and allocate resources accordingly. Organizations should develop an alliance competence or capability-focused alliance function. If resources dedicated to an alliance are not utilized, then they should be returned to the contributing party or at least not considered when distributing alliance-derived proceeds. When alliances cease creating value, objectively evaluate whether or not they should be terminated. Originality/Value/Contribution of the paper. This paper advances alliance theory and practice by taking a complementary view of alliance failure and articulating how managers' decisions and (in)actions influence the likelihood of alliance failure at various points in the alliance lifecycle (Table 1). By highlighting factors that lead to failure, managers can take actions to improve the likelihood of success of strategic alliances. KEYWORDS: Strategic alliancesfailureescalation theoryalliance strategyinterorganizational relationships" @default.
• W2004249990 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2004249990 creator A5075993406 @default.
• W2004249990 date "2007-08-08" @default.
• W2004249990 modified "2023-10-07" @default.
• W2004249990 title "Strategic Alliances: What Can We Learn When They Fail?" @default.
• W2004249990 cites W1543027222 @default.
• W2004249990 cites W1974002046 @default.
• W2004249990 cites W1977652504 @default.
• W2004249990 cites W1991670833 @default.
• W2004249990 cites W2003755540 @default.
• W2004249990 cites W2007796700 @default.
• W2004249990 cites W2034945128 @default.
• W2004249990 cites W2037597051 @default.
• W2004249990 cites W2047159741 @default.
• W2004249990 cites W2064420673 @default.
• W2004249990 cites W2073882566 @default.
• W2004249990 cites W2080630359 @default.
• W2004249990 cites W2090480429 @default.
• W2004249990 cites W2093713031 @default.
• W2004249990 cites W2110823299 @default.
• W2004249990 cites W2114336912 @default.
• W2004249990 cites W2116211158 @default.
• W2004249990 cites W2119064273 @default.
• W2004249990 cites W2146110885 @default.
• W2004249990 cites W2167209581 @default.
• W2004249990 cites W3189603569 @default.
• W2004249990 cites W4232272160 @default.
• W2004249990 cites W4254010957 @default.
• W2004249990 cites W4256737484 @default.
• W2004249990 doi "https://doi.org/10.1300/j033v14n03_01" @default.
• W2004249990 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W2004249990 type Work @default.
• W2004249990 sameAs 2004249990 @default.
• W2004249990 citedByCount "16" @default.
• W2004249990 countsByYear W20042499902012 @default.
• W2004249990 countsByYear W20042499902013 @default.
• W2004249990 countsByYear W20042499902014 @default.
• W2004249990 countsByYear W20042499902016 @default.
• W2004249990 countsByYear W20042499902019 @default.
• W2004249990 countsByYear W20042499902022 @default.
• W2004249990 countsByYear W20042499902023 @default.
• W2004249990 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2004249990 hasAuthorship W2004249990A5075993406 @default.
• W2004249990 hasConcept C100521375 @default.
• W2004249990 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
• W2004249990 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2004249990 hasConcept C14036430 @default.
• W2004249990 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2004249990 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2004249990 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W2004249990 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2004249990 hasConcept C178300618 @default.
• W2004249990 hasConcept C187736073 @default.
• W2004249990 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2004249990 hasConcept C2776291640 @default.
• W2004249990 hasConcept C2776474809 @default.
• W2004249990 hasConcept C2778023277 @default.
• W2004249990 hasConcept C2778431023 @default.
• W2004249990 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2004249990 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2004249990 hasConcept C56739046 @default.
• W2004249990 hasConcept C78458016 @default.
• W2004249990 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2004249990 hasConceptScore W2004249990C100521375 @default.
• W2004249990 hasConceptScore W2004249990C119857082 @default.
• W2004249990 hasConceptScore W2004249990C138885662 @default.
• W2004249990 hasConceptScore W2004249990C14036430 @default.
• W2004249990 hasConceptScore W2004249990C144133560 @default.
• W2004249990 hasConceptScore W2004249990C162324750 @default.
• W2004249990 hasConceptScore W2004249990C162853370 @default.
• W2004249990 hasConceptScore W2004249990C17744445 @default.
• W2004249990 hasConceptScore W2004249990C178300618 @default.
• W2004249990 hasConceptScore W2004249990C187736073 @default.
• W2004249990 hasConceptScore W2004249990C199539241 @default.
• W2004249990 hasConceptScore W2004249990C2776291640 @default.
• W2004249990 hasConceptScore W2004249990C2776474809 @default.
• W2004249990 hasConceptScore W2004249990C2778023277 @default.
• W2004249990 hasConceptScore W2004249990C2778431023 @default.
• W2004249990 hasConceptScore W2004249990C41008148 @default.
• W2004249990 hasConceptScore W2004249990C41895202 @default.
• W2004249990 hasConceptScore W2004249990C56739046 @default.
• W2004249990 hasConceptScore W2004249990C78458016 @default.
• W2004249990 hasConceptScore W2004249990C86803240 @default.
• W2004249990 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2004249990 hasLocation W20042499901 @default.
• W2004249990 hasOpenAccess W2004249990 @default.
• W2004249990 hasPrimaryLocation W20042499901 @default.
• W2004249990 hasRelatedWork W1785014385 @default.
• W2004249990 hasRelatedWork W2360515822 @default.
• W2004249990 hasRelatedWork W2360516853 @default.
• W2004249990 hasRelatedWork W2372612692 @default.
• W2004249990 hasRelatedWork W2387285454 @default.
• W2004249990 hasRelatedWork W2393441362 @default.
• W2004249990 hasRelatedWork W2611323128 @default.
• W2004249990 hasRelatedWork W3125818297 @default.
• W2004249990 hasRelatedWork W4293257762 @default.
• W2004249990 hasRelatedWork W590788508 @default.

• next