Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2004346739> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 75 of
75
with 100 items per page.
- W2004346739 endingPage "30" @default.
- W2004346739 startingPage "2" @default.
- W2004346739 abstract "A cardinal principle of prescriptivism is that no indicative can be validly derived from a set of imperatives. More correctly: 'No indicative conclusion can be validly drawn from a set of premises which cannot be drawn from the indicatives among them alone'. 1 (Hare (1952) p.28) This is rule 1) ofR.M. Hare's logic of imperatives: rule 2) being Hare's variant of Hume's Law No-Imperative-from-a-set-of-Indicatives. Yet here we confront an antimony in Hare's thought. For he also believes in Ought-Implies-Can. And since Oughts approximate imperatives whilst Cans are indicatives, this appears to contradict the No-Ind-from-Imp principle. What's more, Hare bases Ought-Implies-Can on the prescriptive or imperative nature of Ought. (It is not the descriptive component of Ought-Judgements that justifies the Can). 2 The argument is roughly this. Moral judgements are akin to orders, and orders and Oughts are both answers to practical questions; 'What shall I do?' and 'What ought I to do?' respectively. Where the agent cannot do the thing in question (or even when she is bound to do it) the practical question 'does not arise'. An Ought or an order would be out of place. To put it another way, if I tell you to do something when you obviously can't, this is rather pointless. Hence both 'Do X!', and 'You Ought to do X', imply that you can. (Hare (1963) ch. 4). Note that this is an implication. Perhaps this offers a way out of the apparen t contradication. We can distinguish between two theses: a) tha t imperat ives cannot imply indicatives, and b) that imperatives cannot imply indicatives. The first could be true and the second false. And it is indeed the case that Hare considers the relationship between Oughts and Cans (and between orders and Cans) to be weaker than" @default.
- W2004346739 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2004346739 creator A5082503593 @default.
- W2004346739 date "1990-04-01" @default.
- W2004346739 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
- W2004346739 title "Ought-implies-can: Erasmus Luther and R.M. Hare" @default.
- W2004346739 cites W120649967 @default.
- W2004346739 cites W123150905 @default.
- W2004346739 cites W1521303283 @default.
- W2004346739 cites W1608331338 @default.
- W2004346739 cites W1969317601 @default.
- W2004346739 cites W1983511257 @default.
- W2004346739 cites W1991270422 @default.
- W2004346739 cites W2035165282 @default.
- W2004346739 cites W2037988961 @default.
- W2004346739 cites W2039168968 @default.
- W2004346739 cites W2046793069 @default.
- W2004346739 cites W2150602032 @default.
- W2004346739 cites W2264742718 @default.
- W2004346739 cites W2323644205 @default.
- W2004346739 cites W2478122394 @default.
- W2004346739 cites W612228839 @default.
- W2004346739 cites W2612057211 @default.
- W2004346739 doi "https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02782712" @default.
- W2004346739 hasPublicationYear "1990" @default.
- W2004346739 type Work @default.
- W2004346739 sameAs 2004346739 @default.
- W2004346739 citedByCount "16" @default.
- W2004346739 countsByYear W20043467392012 @default.
- W2004346739 countsByYear W20043467392016 @default.
- W2004346739 countsByYear W20043467392017 @default.
- W2004346739 countsByYear W20043467392018 @default.
- W2004346739 countsByYear W20043467392020 @default.
- W2004346739 countsByYear W20043467392021 @default.
- W2004346739 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2004346739 hasAuthorship W2004346739A5082503593 @default.
- W2004346739 hasBestOaLocation W20043467392 @default.
- W2004346739 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
- W2004346739 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W2004346739 hasConcept C27206212 @default.
- W2004346739 hasConcept C2779157386 @default.
- W2004346739 hasConcept C52069626 @default.
- W2004346739 hasConcept C52119013 @default.
- W2004346739 hasConcept C81698637 @default.
- W2004346739 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
- W2004346739 hasConceptScore W2004346739C111472728 @default.
- W2004346739 hasConceptScore W2004346739C138885662 @default.
- W2004346739 hasConceptScore W2004346739C27206212 @default.
- W2004346739 hasConceptScore W2004346739C2779157386 @default.
- W2004346739 hasConceptScore W2004346739C52069626 @default.
- W2004346739 hasConceptScore W2004346739C52119013 @default.
- W2004346739 hasConceptScore W2004346739C81698637 @default.
- W2004346739 hasConceptScore W2004346739C95457728 @default.
- W2004346739 hasIssue "1" @default.
- W2004346739 hasLocation W20043467391 @default.
- W2004346739 hasLocation W20043467392 @default.
- W2004346739 hasOpenAccess W2004346739 @default.
- W2004346739 hasPrimaryLocation W20043467391 @default.
- W2004346739 hasRelatedWork W1975599094 @default.
- W2004346739 hasRelatedWork W2059477162 @default.
- W2004346739 hasRelatedWork W2075707271 @default.
- W2004346739 hasRelatedWork W2128548725 @default.
- W2004346739 hasRelatedWork W2206029002 @default.
- W2004346739 hasRelatedWork W2743956137 @default.
- W2004346739 hasRelatedWork W2800437507 @default.
- W2004346739 hasRelatedWork W2990751091 @default.
- W2004346739 hasRelatedWork W3188390302 @default.
- W2004346739 hasRelatedWork W4288442497 @default.
- W2004346739 hasVolume "29" @default.
- W2004346739 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2004346739 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2004346739 magId "2004346739" @default.
- W2004346739 workType "article" @default.