FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2004387637> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2004387637 endingPage "e63" @default.
• W2004387637 startingPage "e57" @default.
• W2004387637 abstract "Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate: 1) the apical root surface, gutta-percha interface, and preparation time of root-end resections made with burs, ultrasound, or laser; and 2) the thickness of surrounding dentin after laser or ultrasonic root-end cavity preparation. Study design 1) Thirty root-filled teeth were resected as follows: Zekrya bur in group I, Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD) ultrasonic tip (9.5107-8) in group II, and ErCr:YSGG (Waterlase) in group III. The preparation time was recorded. Replicas of the resected root-ends were examined under a scanning electron microscope (SEM). 2) Thirty root-filled teeth were submitted to apicectomies and root-end cavities were prepared by using: CVD (6.1107-6) ultrasonic retrotips (group IV), EMS (DT-060) ultrasonic retrotips (group V), and ErCr:YSGG laser tips (group VI). Replicas of the root apices were examined under a SEM. Results There were no fissures or fractures on root-end surfaces. The bur produced the smoothest surface (P < .05). Group I had the lowest preparation time (P < .05). The best adaptation between the filling and the root canals walls was observed in group III, but it was not significantly different from group II (P < .05). No resected root-ends had cracks after preparation. Group VI showed the least minimum dentin thickness (P < .05). Conclusions The 3 methods evaluated did not cause any injury to the root-end surface, but they harmed the apical adaptation. Laser tips removed more dentin than ultrasonic retrotips and should be used with care to avoid overpreparation. The aim of this study was to evaluate: 1) the apical root surface, gutta-percha interface, and preparation time of root-end resections made with burs, ultrasound, or laser; and 2) the thickness of surrounding dentin after laser or ultrasonic root-end cavity preparation. 1) Thirty root-filled teeth were resected as follows: Zekrya bur in group I, Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD) ultrasonic tip (9.5107-8) in group II, and ErCr:YSGG (Waterlase) in group III. The preparation time was recorded. Replicas of the resected root-ends were examined under a scanning electron microscope (SEM). 2) Thirty root-filled teeth were submitted to apicectomies and root-end cavities were prepared by using: CVD (6.1107-6) ultrasonic retrotips (group IV), EMS (DT-060) ultrasonic retrotips (group V), and ErCr:YSGG laser tips (group VI). Replicas of the root apices were examined under a SEM. There were no fissures or fractures on root-end surfaces. The bur produced the smoothest surface (P < .05). Group I had the lowest preparation time (P < .05). The best adaptation between the filling and the root canals walls was observed in group III, but it was not significantly different from group II (P < .05). No resected root-ends had cracks after preparation. Group VI showed the least minimum dentin thickness (P < .05). The 3 methods evaluated did not cause any injury to the root-end surface, but they harmed the apical adaptation. Laser tips removed more dentin than ultrasonic retrotips and should be used with care to avoid overpreparation." @default.
• W2004387637 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2004387637 creator A5023559734 @default.
• W2004387637 creator A5035973164 @default.
• W2004387637 creator A5036781465 @default.
• W2004387637 creator A5067333854 @default.
• W2004387637 creator A5067719916 @default.
• W2004387637 creator A5079495989 @default.
• W2004387637 creator A5084306198 @default.
• W2004387637 date "2010-10-01" @default.
• W2004387637 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
• W2004387637 title "An in vitro evaluation of apicoectomies and retropreparations using different methods" @default.
• W2004387637 cites W1556844766 @default.
• W2004387637 cites W1720290244 @default.
• W2004387637 cites W1966470794 @default.
• W2004387637 cites W1970418746 @default.
• W2004387637 cites W1973532517 @default.
• W2004387637 cites W1974324517 @default.
• W2004387637 cites W1978617479 @default.
• W2004387637 cites W1980138908 @default.
• W2004387637 cites W1985906542 @default.
• W2004387637 cites W1995178125 @default.
• W2004387637 cites W2001120103 @default.
• W2004387637 cites W2021270744 @default.
• W2004387637 cites W2022539698 @default.
• W2004387637 cites W2028365713 @default.
• W2004387637 cites W2029022399 @default.
• W2004387637 cites W2030308873 @default.
• W2004387637 cites W2034757385 @default.
• W2004387637 cites W2035876077 @default.
• W2004387637 cites W2036669566 @default.
• W2004387637 cites W2044745900 @default.
• W2004387637 cites W2069057225 @default.
• W2004387637 cites W2069715075 @default.
• W2004387637 cites W2071214637 @default.
• W2004387637 cites W2078470052 @default.
• W2004387637 cites W2082897880 @default.
• W2004387637 cites W2084350998 @default.
• W2004387637 cites W2084465764 @default.
• W2004387637 cites W2092579561 @default.
• W2004387637 cites W2093131571 @default.
• W2004387637 cites W2093499289 @default.
• W2004387637 cites W2094059738 @default.
• W2004387637 cites W2102512078 @default.
• W2004387637 cites W2121894591 @default.
• W2004387637 cites W2136109721 @default.
• W2004387637 cites W2152613258 @default.
• W2004387637 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.03.004" @default.
• W2004387637 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20573528" @default.
• W2004387637 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W2004387637 type Work @default.
• W2004387637 sameAs 2004387637 @default.
• W2004387637 citedByCount "23" @default.
• W2004387637 countsByYear W20043876372012 @default.
• W2004387637 countsByYear W20043876372013 @default.
• W2004387637 countsByYear W20043876372014 @default.
• W2004387637 countsByYear W20043876372017 @default.
• W2004387637 countsByYear W20043876372018 @default.
• W2004387637 countsByYear W20043876372019 @default.
• W2004387637 countsByYear W20043876372020 @default.
• W2004387637 countsByYear W20043876372021 @default.
• W2004387637 countsByYear W20043876372023 @default.
• W2004387637 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2004387637 hasAuthorship W2004387637A5023559734 @default.
• W2004387637 hasAuthorship W2004387637A5035973164 @default.
• W2004387637 hasAuthorship W2004387637A5036781465 @default.
• W2004387637 hasAuthorship W2004387637A5067333854 @default.
• W2004387637 hasAuthorship W2004387637A5067719916 @default.
• W2004387637 hasAuthorship W2004387637A5079495989 @default.
• W2004387637 hasAuthorship W2004387637A5084306198 @default.
• W2004387637 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2004387637 hasConcept C143753070 @default.
• W2004387637 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W2004387637 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2004387637 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W2004387637 hasConcept C26771246 @default.
• W2004387637 hasConcept C2778492126 @default.
• W2004387637 hasConcept C2779263046 @default.
• W2004387637 hasConcept C3020334819 @default.
• W2004387637 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2004387637 hasConcept C81288441 @default.
• W2004387637 hasConceptScore W2004387637C126838900 @default.
• W2004387637 hasConceptScore W2004387637C143753070 @default.
• W2004387637 hasConceptScore W2004387637C159985019 @default.
• W2004387637 hasConceptScore W2004387637C192562407 @default.
• W2004387637 hasConceptScore W2004387637C199343813 @default.
• W2004387637 hasConceptScore W2004387637C26771246 @default.
• W2004387637 hasConceptScore W2004387637C2778492126 @default.
• W2004387637 hasConceptScore W2004387637C2779263046 @default.
• W2004387637 hasConceptScore W2004387637C3020334819 @default.
• W2004387637 hasConceptScore W2004387637C71924100 @default.
• W2004387637 hasConceptScore W2004387637C81288441 @default.
• W2004387637 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2004387637 hasLocation W20043876371 @default.
• W2004387637 hasLocation W20043876372 @default.
• W2004387637 hasOpenAccess W2004387637 @default.
• W2004387637 hasPrimaryLocation W20043876371 @default.
• W2004387637 hasRelatedWork W2059312186 @default.

• next