Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2004457926> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 70 of
70
with 100 items per page.
- W2004457926 endingPage "199" @default.
- W2004457926 startingPage "186" @default.
- W2004457926 abstract "Gaming the Trace:Systems Theory for Comparative Literature Bruce Clarke Situated in the external zone of the Milky Way, the Sun takes about two hundred million years to make a complete revolution of the Galaxy. Right, that's how long it takes, not a day less,—Qfwfq said,—once, as I went past, I drew a sign at a point in space, just so I could find it again two hundred million years later, when we went by the next time around. . . . I conceived the idea of making a sign, that's true enough, or rather, I conceived the idea of considering a sign a something that I felt like making, so when, at that point in space and not in another, I made something, meaning to make a sign, it turned out that I really had made a sign, after all. Italo Calvino The Reception of the Trace Let's imagine a beginning similar to the one Calvino's Qfwfq tells, but more down to Earth. We will begin not with a sign, exactly, but with the trace that precedes the sign. Our origin myth has two versions. In the first myth, a long time ago, chipped flint in hominid hand, some being confronts a roughly uniform piece of solid matter, say, an outcropping of granite, and, for whatever reason, scratches a mark into the stone. In the second myth, equally long if not longer ago, a meteor falls to Earth sending up a splash of pulverized rock, one shard of which hits the same granite outcropping and leaves an identical if unintentional scratch. For our purposes, the two versions tell the same story: traces arise whether they are intended or not. However it came to be, this trace or mark subsists as a difference etched into its stony medium. It endures for a while, for a thousand or ten million years. Insofar as it endures, it memorializes its making. Persisting as a difference figured onto a ground previously undifferentiated, at least with regard to the presence of marks, the trace marks its own origin. In the first instance, for its observer, the trace refers to itself.1 The trace refers to its own coming to be as a trace. But what next? What does it mean for a trace to endure, to cross over distances and durations intervening between its coming to be in one place and moment and [End Page 186] its itinerary of future destinations? With regard to the temporality of the trace: as long as the trace persists, it never ceases referring to itself. But too, the trace also marks in an indeterminate manner the datum that time passes and has passed from the moment of its taking place to all the later moments of its being observed, remarked, received by an observer capable of discerning it as a mark, as a sign of the event that produced it. Qfwfq's account could be taken to indicate that a sign comes to be not when its trace is made, but when it is read as a sign. There will be an interval, however infinitesimal or lengthy, between the production of a trace and its observation as a sign. The time and place to be concerned with intentions is occupied by the observer of the trace. Placed now in the time of that observer or reader, the trace presents itself to a present reception as a sign. Re-marking the trace, that observer can now intend to understand it, can allow the trace to carry its understanding away, perhaps to reconstruct a notion of the mark's moment of production, or to cross over to whatever other significances that observer can construct or entertain in regard to it. Having imported an observer and all of the systemic baggage that phenomenon brings onto the scene with it, our composite origin scenario is now compounded of these elements: a prior event that makes a trace; a material or technical object capable of tracing; a medium to accept and preserve the trace; the trace itself; intervening space; intervening time; and a later agent to observe and construe the trace as a sign. These contingencies and implications of the trace..." @default.
- W2004457926 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2004457926 creator A5049605029 @default.
- W2004457926 date "2013-01-01" @default.
- W2004457926 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
- W2004457926 title "Gaming the Trace: Systems Theory for Comparative Literature" @default.
- W2004457926 cites W1500910854 @default.
- W2004457926 cites W1916207017 @default.
- W2004457926 cites W1993752193 @default.
- W2004457926 cites W2024063860 @default.
- W2004457926 cites W2047049292 @default.
- W2004457926 cites W2072026461 @default.
- W2004457926 cites W2602160915 @default.
- W2004457926 cites W583848189 @default.
- W2004457926 cites W624770901 @default.
- W2004457926 cites W638956438 @default.
- W2004457926 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/com.2013.0014" @default.
- W2004457926 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
- W2004457926 type Work @default.
- W2004457926 sameAs 2004457926 @default.
- W2004457926 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W2004457926 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2004457926 hasAuthorship W2004457926A5049605029 @default.
- W2004457926 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
- W2004457926 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
- W2004457926 hasConcept C134306372 @default.
- W2004457926 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W2004457926 hasConcept C139676723 @default.
- W2004457926 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
- W2004457926 hasConcept C2780876879 @default.
- W2004457926 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W2004457926 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
- W2004457926 hasConcept C519517224 @default.
- W2004457926 hasConcept C52119013 @default.
- W2004457926 hasConcept C75291252 @default.
- W2004457926 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
- W2004457926 hasConceptScore W2004457926C111472728 @default.
- W2004457926 hasConceptScore W2004457926C124952713 @default.
- W2004457926 hasConceptScore W2004457926C134306372 @default.
- W2004457926 hasConceptScore W2004457926C138885662 @default.
- W2004457926 hasConceptScore W2004457926C139676723 @default.
- W2004457926 hasConceptScore W2004457926C142362112 @default.
- W2004457926 hasConceptScore W2004457926C2780876879 @default.
- W2004457926 hasConceptScore W2004457926C33923547 @default.
- W2004457926 hasConceptScore W2004457926C41895202 @default.
- W2004457926 hasConceptScore W2004457926C519517224 @default.
- W2004457926 hasConceptScore W2004457926C52119013 @default.
- W2004457926 hasConceptScore W2004457926C75291252 @default.
- W2004457926 hasConceptScore W2004457926C95457728 @default.
- W2004457926 hasIssue "1" @default.
- W2004457926 hasLocation W20044579261 @default.
- W2004457926 hasOpenAccess W2004457926 @default.
- W2004457926 hasPrimaryLocation W20044579261 @default.
- W2004457926 hasRelatedWork W1977776122 @default.
- W2004457926 hasRelatedWork W2004988322 @default.
- W2004457926 hasRelatedWork W2381794334 @default.
- W2004457926 hasRelatedWork W2551566576 @default.
- W2004457926 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
- W2004457926 hasRelatedWork W2778072733 @default.
- W2004457926 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
- W2004457926 hasRelatedWork W3187442381 @default.
- W2004457926 hasRelatedWork W4231130182 @default.
- W2004457926 hasRelatedWork W3159409152 @default.
- W2004457926 hasVolume "37" @default.
- W2004457926 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2004457926 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2004457926 magId "2004457926" @default.
- W2004457926 workType "article" @default.