FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2004689595> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2004689595 endingPage "6714" @default.
• W2004689595 startingPage "6703" @default.
• W2004689595 abstract "Although horizontal slip directions determined for earthquakes along transform faults and shallow subduction thrust faults are commonly assumed to parallel the direction of motion between two plates, systematic biases of earthquake slip vectors relative to the local long‐term average plate direction can be introduced by a variety of causes, including deformation of forearcs above subduction zones, unmodeled lateral velocity heterogeneities near earthquake sources, and unrecognized changes in plate velocities within the averaging interval of the kinematic model. Given that earthquake slip vectors comprise nearly two thirds of the data used to derive the NUVEL‐1 model for present‐day global plate velocities, it is important to determine the extent to which potential systematic biases of earthquake slip vectors could degrade estimates of plate velocities given by NUVEL‐1. Here, two alternative models for global plate velocities are derived and compared to NUVEL‐1 The first model, NUVEL‐SZ, is derived from a data set that omits the 240 subduction zone sup vectors in the NUVEL‐1 data set but includes all remaining 882 kinematic data. The velocities predicted by NUVEL‐SZ and NUVEL‐1 differ little, with maximum differences of only 1 mm yr −1 and 2° along all plate boundaries except those surrounding the Caribbean plate. The second model NUVEL‐G is derived from a data set that omits all 724 earthquake sup vectors but includes the remaining 277 spreading rates and 121 transform fault azimuths. Velocities predicted by NUVEL‐G and NUVEL‐1 also differ little, with maximum differences of 2 mm yr −1 and 4° except for the Caribbean plate boundaries. These results indicate that even in the unlikely event that all earthquake slip vectors in the NUVEL‐1 data set are unreliable recorders of long‐term plate directions, the slip vectors do not significantly degrade the model. It thus appears that the decision to use or not to use earthquake slip vectors to derive a global plate motion model has little practical effect on the ability to derive an accurate description of present‐day plate velocities. Little emphasis is placed on the changes in estimates of Caribbean plate velocities that occur upon exclusion of earthquake slip vectors; nearly all of the data from Caribbean plate boundaries are suspect and it is unlikely that the NUVEL‐SZ or NUVEL‐G models represent a significantly improved description of Caribbean plate velocities. Comparison of 677 slip vectors from transform faults to directions predicted by NUVEL‐G shows statistically insignificant differences along 12 of 15 spreading centers. The good agreement between the nearly instantaneous estimates of slip directions provided by slip vectors and the longer‐term average directions given by NUVEL‐G suggest that in general, transform fault slip vectors parallel the longer‐term average directions along transform faults. Interestingly, a statistically significant difference between slip vectors from right‐slipping and left‐slipping transform faults is noted for nearly all spreading centers, with slip vectors along right‐slipping and left‐slipping faults rotated clockwise and counterclockwise, respectively, from the predicted direction. The cause of this bias is unknown, but may be related to biases introduced by unmodeled lateral heterogeneities in the mantle near transform faults." @default.
• W2004689595 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2004689595 creator A5054791909 @default.
• W2004689595 date "1993-04-10" @default.
• W2004689595 modified "2023-10-13" @default.
• W2004689595 title "Earthquake slip vectors and estimates of present‐day plate motions" @default.
• W2004689595 cites W1979965872 @default.
• W2004689595 cites W1991794762 @default.
• W2004689595 cites W1992982899 @default.
• W2004689595 cites W1993165032 @default.
• W2004689595 cites W2004501456 @default.
• W2004689595 cites W2009384049 @default.
• W2004689595 cites W2009930154 @default.
• W2004689595 cites W2025021642 @default.
• W2004689595 cites W2025508553 @default.
• W2004689595 cites W2037381161 @default.
• W2004689595 cites W2044149101 @default.
• W2004689595 cites W2048017732 @default.
• W2004689595 cites W2054334560 @default.
• W2004689595 cites W2056259282 @default.
• W2004689595 cites W2057313238 @default.
• W2004689595 cites W2064315304 @default.
• W2004689595 cites W2089818442 @default.
• W2004689595 cites W2097800673 @default.
• W2004689595 cites W2120620497 @default.
• W2004689595 cites W2128689328 @default.
• W2004689595 cites W2135494568 @default.
• W2004689595 cites W2140627093 @default.
• W2004689595 cites W2160361224 @default.
• W2004689595 cites W2165026072 @default.
• W2004689595 cites W2168331749 @default.
• W2004689595 doi "https://doi.org/10.1029/92jb02868" @default.
• W2004689595 hasPublicationYear "1993" @default.
• W2004689595 type Work @default.
• W2004689595 sameAs 2004689595 @default.
• W2004689595 citedByCount "47" @default.
• W2004689595 countsByYear W20046895952012 @default.
• W2004689595 countsByYear W20046895952014 @default.
• W2004689595 countsByYear W20046895952015 @default.
• W2004689595 countsByYear W20046895952019 @default.
• W2004689595 countsByYear W20046895952021 @default.
• W2004689595 countsByYear W20046895952022 @default.
• W2004689595 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2004689595 hasAuthorship W2004689595A5054791909 @default.
• W2004689595 hasConcept C119477230 @default.
• W2004689595 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2004689595 hasConcept C127313418 @default.
• W2004689595 hasConcept C13280743 @default.
• W2004689595 hasConcept C165205528 @default.
• W2004689595 hasConcept C195268267 @default.
• W2004689595 hasConcept C39920418 @default.
• W2004689595 hasConcept C58097730 @default.
• W2004689595 hasConcept C63441156 @default.
• W2004689595 hasConcept C74650414 @default.
• W2004689595 hasConcept C77928131 @default.
• W2004689595 hasConcept C83176761 @default.
• W2004689595 hasConcept C97355855 @default.
• W2004689595 hasConceptScore W2004689595C119477230 @default.
• W2004689595 hasConceptScore W2004689595C121332964 @default.
• W2004689595 hasConceptScore W2004689595C127313418 @default.
• W2004689595 hasConceptScore W2004689595C13280743 @default.
• W2004689595 hasConceptScore W2004689595C165205528 @default.
• W2004689595 hasConceptScore W2004689595C195268267 @default.
• W2004689595 hasConceptScore W2004689595C39920418 @default.
• W2004689595 hasConceptScore W2004689595C58097730 @default.
• W2004689595 hasConceptScore W2004689595C63441156 @default.
• W2004689595 hasConceptScore W2004689595C74650414 @default.
• W2004689595 hasConceptScore W2004689595C77928131 @default.
• W2004689595 hasConceptScore W2004689595C83176761 @default.
• W2004689595 hasConceptScore W2004689595C97355855 @default.
• W2004689595 hasIssue "B4" @default.
• W2004689595 hasLocation W20046895951 @default.
• W2004689595 hasOpenAccess W2004689595 @default.
• W2004689595 hasPrimaryLocation W20046895951 @default.
• W2004689595 hasRelatedWork W1988769721 @default.
• W2004689595 hasRelatedWork W2042540463 @default.
• W2004689595 hasRelatedWork W2066073101 @default.
• W2004689595 hasRelatedWork W2076952418 @default.
• W2004689595 hasRelatedWork W2166482715 @default.
• W2004689595 hasRelatedWork W2551125798 @default.
• W2004689595 hasRelatedWork W2999256407 @default.
• W2004689595 hasRelatedWork W3003166664 @default.
• W2004689595 hasRelatedWork W4210462659 @default.
• W2004689595 hasRelatedWork W1577153944 @default.
• W2004689595 hasVolume "98" @default.
• W2004689595 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2004689595 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2004689595 magId "2004689595" @default.
• W2004689595 workType "article" @default.