FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2004772674> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2004772674 endingPage "1101" @default.
• W2004772674 startingPage "1095" @default.
• W2004772674 abstract "ObjectivePercutaneous access during endovascular aneurysm repair has been difficult owing to the large size of the delivery catheters. This study reports a single-center experience of totally percutaneous access during endovascular abdominal and thoracic aortic repairs using the Perclose Proglide device (Abbott Vascular, Redwood City, Calif).MethodsBetween December 2004 and August 2006, 262 endovascular aortic aneurysm repairs were performed. Percutaneous access was used for the introduction of 12F to 24F sheaths (4.4-mm to 8.6-mm outer diameter). The technique involved deployment of two Proglide devices before insertion of the sheath (“Preclose” technique) with the sutures left extracorporeally for closure after conclusion of the procedure. A prospectively maintained endovascular database and medical records were retrospectively reviewed. Rates of technical success, failure modes, and the overall duration of the endovascular repair compared with a similar cohort using open femoral exposures were examined.ResultsA total of 559 Proglide devices were used to close 279 femoral arteries, and 175 (63%) required the insertion of 18F to 24F sheaths. There were 16 failures, mainly due to obesity, device malfunction, severe calcific disease, and faulty arterial punctures, for a technical success rate of 94.3%. The success rates for 12F to 16F size sheaths were significantly higher than for the larger 18F to 24F sheaths (99.0% vs 91.4%, P < .01). For both endovascular abdominal (EVAR) and thoracic (TEVAR) aortic repairs, the Preclose technique resulted in shorter overall procedure times compared with a similar cohort in which open femoral exposures were used (EVAR, 115 vs 128 min, P < .001; TEVAR, 80 vs 112, P = .019). Despite this reduction of procedure time, the savings on the cost of operating room time was negated by the cost of the Proglide devices ($295 per device).ConclusionsPercutaneous access for endovascular aortic repair is safe and feasible using the Proglide device. Although the success rates are higher for smaller size sheaths, successful closures may be obtained for up to 24F sheaths. Percutaneous access may result in shorter overall procedure times and potentially lower operating room costs, but this appears to be offset by the cost of the closure devices. Percutaneous access during endovascular aneurysm repair has been difficult owing to the large size of the delivery catheters. This study reports a single-center experience of totally percutaneous access during endovascular abdominal and thoracic aortic repairs using the Perclose Proglide device (Abbott Vascular, Redwood City, Calif). Between December 2004 and August 2006, 262 endovascular aortic aneurysm repairs were performed. Percutaneous access was used for the introduction of 12F to 24F sheaths (4.4-mm to 8.6-mm outer diameter). The technique involved deployment of two Proglide devices before insertion of the sheath (“Preclose” technique) with the sutures left extracorporeally for closure after conclusion of the procedure. A prospectively maintained endovascular database and medical records were retrospectively reviewed. Rates of technical success, failure modes, and the overall duration of the endovascular repair compared with a similar cohort using open femoral exposures were examined. A total of 559 Proglide devices were used to close 279 femoral arteries, and 175 (63%) required the insertion of 18F to 24F sheaths. There were 16 failures, mainly due to obesity, device malfunction, severe calcific disease, and faulty arterial punctures, for a technical success rate of 94.3%. The success rates for 12F to 16F size sheaths were significantly higher than for the larger 18F to 24F sheaths (99.0% vs 91.4%, P < .01). For both endovascular abdominal (EVAR) and thoracic (TEVAR) aortic repairs, the Preclose technique resulted in shorter overall procedure times compared with a similar cohort in which open femoral exposures were used (EVAR, 115 vs 128 min, P < .001; TEVAR, 80 vs 112, P = .019). Despite this reduction of procedure time, the savings on the cost of operating room time was negated by the cost of the Proglide devices ($295 per device). Percutaneous access for endovascular aortic repair is safe and feasible using the Proglide device. Although the success rates are higher for smaller size sheaths, successful closures may be obtained for up to 24F sheaths. Percutaneous access may result in shorter overall procedure times and potentially lower operating room costs, but this appears to be offset by the cost of the closure devices." @default.
• W2004772674 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2004772674 creator A5021075431 @default.
• W2004772674 creator A5060999104 @default.
• W2004772674 creator A5070756295 @default.
• W2004772674 creator A5082057305 @default.
• W2004772674 date "2007-06-01" @default.
• W2004772674 modified "2023-10-10" @default.
• W2004772674 title "Total percutaneous access for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (“Preclose” technique)" @default.
• W2004772674 cites W1593776909 @default.
• W2004772674 cites W2048744248 @default.
• W2004772674 cites W2098220172 @default.
• W2004772674 cites W2154353091 @default.
• W2004772674 cites W2164718491 @default.
• W2004772674 cites W4239675609 @default.
• W2004772674 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2007.01.050" @default.
• W2004772674 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17398056" @default.
• W2004772674 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W2004772674 type Work @default.
• W2004772674 sameAs 2004772674 @default.
• W2004772674 citedByCount "218" @default.
• W2004772674 countsByYear W20047726742012 @default.
• W2004772674 countsByYear W20047726742013 @default.
• W2004772674 countsByYear W20047726742014 @default.
• W2004772674 countsByYear W20047726742015 @default.
• W2004772674 countsByYear W20047726742016 @default.
• W2004772674 countsByYear W20047726742017 @default.
• W2004772674 countsByYear W20047726742018 @default.
• W2004772674 countsByYear W20047726742019 @default.
• W2004772674 countsByYear W20047726742020 @default.
• W2004772674 countsByYear W20047726742021 @default.
• W2004772674 countsByYear W20047726742022 @default.
• W2004772674 countsByYear W20047726742023 @default.
• W2004772674 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2004772674 hasAuthorship W2004772674A5021075431 @default.
• W2004772674 hasAuthorship W2004772674A5060999104 @default.
• W2004772674 hasAuthorship W2004772674A5070756295 @default.
• W2004772674 hasAuthorship W2004772674A5082057305 @default.
• W2004772674 hasBestOaLocation W20047726741 @default.
• W2004772674 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2004772674 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2004772674 hasConcept C2776098176 @default.
• W2004772674 hasConcept C2776543907 @default.
• W2004772674 hasConcept C2777323849 @default.
• W2004772674 hasConcept C2779495589 @default.
• W2004772674 hasConcept C2779993416 @default.
• W2004772674 hasConcept C2780813298 @default.
• W2004772674 hasConcept C2994150672 @default.
• W2004772674 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2004772674 hasConceptScore W2004772674C126838900 @default.
• W2004772674 hasConceptScore W2004772674C141071460 @default.
• W2004772674 hasConceptScore W2004772674C2776098176 @default.
• W2004772674 hasConceptScore W2004772674C2776543907 @default.
• W2004772674 hasConceptScore W2004772674C2777323849 @default.
• W2004772674 hasConceptScore W2004772674C2779495589 @default.
• W2004772674 hasConceptScore W2004772674C2779993416 @default.
• W2004772674 hasConceptScore W2004772674C2780813298 @default.
• W2004772674 hasConceptScore W2004772674C2994150672 @default.
• W2004772674 hasConceptScore W2004772674C71924100 @default.
• W2004772674 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W2004772674 hasLocation W20047726741 @default.
• W2004772674 hasLocation W20047726742 @default.
• W2004772674 hasOpenAccess W2004772674 @default.
• W2004772674 hasPrimaryLocation W20047726741 @default.
• W2004772674 hasRelatedWork W1590973465 @default.
• W2004772674 hasRelatedWork W1982778236 @default.
• W2004772674 hasRelatedWork W1992069132 @default.
• W2004772674 hasRelatedWork W2090543750 @default.
• W2004772674 hasRelatedWork W2137190715 @default.
• W2004772674 hasRelatedWork W2186960680 @default.
• W2004772674 hasRelatedWork W2385221987 @default.
• W2004772674 hasRelatedWork W2401817375 @default.
• W2004772674 hasRelatedWork W3037686638 @default.
• W2004772674 hasRelatedWork W3014013020 @default.
• W2004772674 hasVolume "45" @default.
• W2004772674 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2004772674 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2004772674 magId "2004772674" @default.
• W2004772674 workType "article" @default.