FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2004865767> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2004865767 endingPage "1714" @default.
• W2004865767 startingPage "1706" @default.
• W2004865767 abstract "Purpose To compare infrared (IR) optical vs. stereoscopic X-ray technologies for patient setup in image-guided stereotactic radiotherapy. Methods and Materials Retrospective data analysis of 233 fractions in 127 patients treated with hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy was performed. Patient setup at the linear accelerator was carried out by means of combined IR optical localization and stereoscopic X-ray image fusion in 6 degrees of freedom (6D). Data were analyzed to evaluate the geometric and dosimetric discrepancy between the two patient setup strategies. Results Differences between IR optical localization and 6D X-ray image fusion parameters were on average within the expected localization accuracy, as limited by CT image resolution (3 mm). A disagreement between the two systems below 1 mm in all directions was measured in patients treated for cranial tumors. In extracranial sites, larger discrepancies and higher variability were observed as a function of the initial patient alignment. The compensation of IR-detected rotational errors resulted in a significantly improved agreement with 6D X-ray image fusion. On the basis of the bony anatomy registrations, the measured differences were found not to be sensitive to patient breathing. The related dosimetric analysis showed that IR-based patient setup caused limited variations in three cases, with 7% maximum dose reduction in the clinical target volume and no dose increase in organs at risk. Conclusions In conclusion, patient setup driven by IR external surrogates localization in 6D featured comparable accuracy with respect to procedures based on stereoscopic X-ray imaging. To compare infrared (IR) optical vs. stereoscopic X-ray technologies for patient setup in image-guided stereotactic radiotherapy. Retrospective data analysis of 233 fractions in 127 patients treated with hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy was performed. Patient setup at the linear accelerator was carried out by means of combined IR optical localization and stereoscopic X-ray image fusion in 6 degrees of freedom (6D). Data were analyzed to evaluate the geometric and dosimetric discrepancy between the two patient setup strategies. Differences between IR optical localization and 6D X-ray image fusion parameters were on average within the expected localization accuracy, as limited by CT image resolution (3 mm). A disagreement between the two systems below 1 mm in all directions was measured in patients treated for cranial tumors. In extracranial sites, larger discrepancies and higher variability were observed as a function of the initial patient alignment. The compensation of IR-detected rotational errors resulted in a significantly improved agreement with 6D X-ray image fusion. On the basis of the bony anatomy registrations, the measured differences were found not to be sensitive to patient breathing. The related dosimetric analysis showed that IR-based patient setup caused limited variations in three cases, with 7% maximum dose reduction in the clinical target volume and no dose increase in organs at risk. In conclusion, patient setup driven by IR external surrogates localization in 6D featured comparable accuracy with respect to procedures based on stereoscopic X-ray imaging." @default.
• W2004865767 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2004865767 creator A5000570208 @default.
• W2004865767 creator A5006519662 @default.
• W2004865767 creator A5017836757 @default.
• W2004865767 creator A5023379101 @default.
• W2004865767 creator A5024977431 @default.
• W2004865767 creator A5030122428 @default.
• W2004865767 creator A5032285191 @default.
• W2004865767 creator A5035223446 @default.
• W2004865767 creator A5053972376 @default.
• W2004865767 creator A5083196840 @default.
• W2004865767 creator A5090125526 @default.
• W2004865767 date "2012-04-01" @default.
• W2004865767 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2004865767 title "Comparison Between Infrared Optical and Stereoscopic X-Ray Technologies for Patient Setup in Image Guided Stereotactic Radiotherapy" @default.
• W2004865767 cites W1506831140 @default.
• W2004865767 cites W1963532464 @default.
• W2004865767 cites W1965775969 @default.
• W2004865767 cites W1975981090 @default.
• W2004865767 cites W1981573022 @default.
• W2004865767 cites W1986513357 @default.
• W2004865767 cites W1991495609 @default.
• W2004865767 cites W2003173557 @default.
• W2004865767 cites W2004439942 @default.
• W2004865767 cites W2006268115 @default.
• W2004865767 cites W2018819159 @default.
• W2004865767 cites W2023202987 @default.
• W2004865767 cites W2034655492 @default.
• W2004865767 cites W2039664617 @default.
• W2004865767 cites W2048841289 @default.
• W2004865767 cites W2049691758 @default.
• W2004865767 cites W2055195075 @default.
• W2004865767 cites W2055777557 @default.
• W2004865767 cites W2064133873 @default.
• W2004865767 cites W2070837530 @default.
• W2004865767 cites W2072741105 @default.
• W2004865767 cites W2076761842 @default.
• W2004865767 cites W2077182705 @default.
• W2004865767 cites W2094218516 @default.
• W2004865767 cites W2102276852 @default.
• W2004865767 cites W2127905515 @default.
• W2004865767 cites W2130418752 @default.
• W2004865767 cites W2131611242 @default.
• W2004865767 cites W2150205278 @default.
• W2004865767 cites W2152733288 @default.
• W2004865767 cites W2162037713 @default.
• W2004865767 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.04.004" @default.
• W2004865767 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21605942" @default.
• W2004865767 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2004865767 type Work @default.
• W2004865767 sameAs 2004865767 @default.
• W2004865767 citedByCount "12" @default.
• W2004865767 countsByYear W20048657672012 @default.
• W2004865767 countsByYear W20048657672013 @default.
• W2004865767 countsByYear W20048657672014 @default.
• W2004865767 countsByYear W20048657672015 @default.
• W2004865767 countsByYear W20048657672020 @default.
• W2004865767 countsByYear W20048657672021 @default.
• W2004865767 countsByYear W20048657672022 @default.
• W2004865767 countsByYear W20048657672023 @default.
• W2004865767 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2004865767 hasAuthorship W2004865767A5000570208 @default.
• W2004865767 hasAuthorship W2004865767A5006519662 @default.
• W2004865767 hasAuthorship W2004865767A5017836757 @default.
• W2004865767 hasAuthorship W2004865767A5023379101 @default.
• W2004865767 hasAuthorship W2004865767A5024977431 @default.
• W2004865767 hasAuthorship W2004865767A5030122428 @default.
• W2004865767 hasAuthorship W2004865767A5032285191 @default.
• W2004865767 hasAuthorship W2004865767A5035223446 @default.
• W2004865767 hasAuthorship W2004865767A5053972376 @default.
• W2004865767 hasAuthorship W2004865767A5083196840 @default.
• W2004865767 hasAuthorship W2004865767A5090125526 @default.
• W2004865767 hasConcept C115961682 @default.
• W2004865767 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W2004865767 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2004865767 hasConcept C126057942 @default.
• W2004865767 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2004865767 hasConcept C2780387249 @default.
• W2004865767 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W2004865767 hasConcept C2992393070 @default.
• W2004865767 hasConcept C31972630 @default.
• W2004865767 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2004865767 hasConcept C509974204 @default.
• W2004865767 hasConcept C69744172 @default.
• W2004865767 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2004865767 hasConcept C9267231 @default.
• W2004865767 hasConceptScore W2004865767C115961682 @default.
• W2004865767 hasConceptScore W2004865767C120665830 @default.
• W2004865767 hasConceptScore W2004865767C121332964 @default.
• W2004865767 hasConceptScore W2004865767C126057942 @default.
• W2004865767 hasConceptScore W2004865767C126838900 @default.
• W2004865767 hasConceptScore W2004865767C2780387249 @default.
• W2004865767 hasConceptScore W2004865767C2989005 @default.
• W2004865767 hasConceptScore W2004865767C2992393070 @default.
• W2004865767 hasConceptScore W2004865767C31972630 @default.
• W2004865767 hasConceptScore W2004865767C41008148 @default.
• W2004865767 hasConceptScore W2004865767C509974204 @default.

• next