FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2004893119> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2004893119 endingPage "2420" @default.
• W2004893119 startingPage "2411" @default.
• W2004893119 abstract "Purpose To determine the diagnostic performance of computed tomography (CT) perfusion techniques for the detection of functionally relevant coronary artery disease (CAD) in comparison to reference standards, including invasive coronary angiography (ICA), single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Materials and methods PubMed, Web of Knowledge and Embase were searched from January 1, 1998 until July 1, 2014. The search yielded 9475 articles. After duplicate removal, 6041 were screened on title and abstract. The resulting 276 articles were independently analyzed in full-text by two reviewers, and included if the inclusion criteria were met. The articles reporting diagnostic parameters including true positive, true negative, false positive and false negative were subsequently evaluated for the meta-analysis. Results were pooled according to CT perfusion technique, namely snapshot techniques: single-phase rest, single-phase stress, single-phase dual-energy stress and combined coronary CT angiography [rest] and single-phase stress, as well the dynamic technique: dynamic stress CT perfusion. Results Twenty-two articles were included in the meta-analysis (1507 subjects). Pooled per-patient sensitivity and specificity of single-phase rest CT compared to rest SPECT were 89% (95% confidence interval [CI], 82–94%) and 88% (95% CI, 78–94%), respectively. Vessel-based sensitivity and specificity of single-phase stress CT compared to ICA-based >70% stenosis were 82% (95% CI, 64–92%) and 78% (95% CI, 61–89%). Segment-based sensitivity and specificity of single-phase dual-energy stress CT in comparison to stress MRI were 75% (95% CI, 60–85%) and 95% (95% CI, 80–99%). Segment-based sensitivity and specificity of dynamic stress CT perfusion compared to stress SPECT were 77% (95% CI, 67–85) and 89% (95% CI, 78–95%). For combined coronary CT angiography and single-phase stress CT, vessel-based sensitivity and specificity in comparison to ICA-based >50% stenosis were 84% (95% CI, 67–93%) and 93% (95% CI, 89–96%). Conclusion This meta-analysis shows considerable variation in techniques and reference standards for CT of myocardial blood supply. While CT seems sensitive and specific for evaluation of hemodynamically relevant CAD, studies so far are limited in size. Standardization of myocardial perfusion CT technique is essential." @default.
• W2004893119 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2004893119 creator A5012401657 @default.
• W2004893119 creator A5017536956 @default.
• W2004893119 creator A5027567559 @default.
• W2004893119 creator A5034218505 @default.
• W2004893119 creator A5051597509 @default.
• W2004893119 creator A5057769816 @default.
• W2004893119 creator A5064667781 @default.
• W2004893119 creator A5080510963 @default.
• W2004893119 date "2015-12-01" @default.
• W2004893119 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2004893119 title "The dream of a one-stop-shop: Meta-analysis on myocardial perfusion CT" @default.
• W2004893119 cites W1972941379 @default.
• W2004893119 cites W1976269434 @default.
• W2004893119 cites W1980382712 @default.
• W2004893119 cites W1987680666 @default.
• W2004893119 cites W1992230880 @default.
• W2004893119 cites W1996618322 @default.
• W2004893119 cites W2007872832 @default.
• W2004893119 cites W2010265989 @default.
• W2004893119 cites W2010392673 @default.
• W2004893119 cites W2011924614 @default.
• W2004893119 cites W2012070510 @default.
• W2004893119 cites W2015373798 @default.
• W2004893119 cites W2016330730 @default.
• W2004893119 cites W2021857781 @default.
• W2004893119 cites W2022987199 @default.
• W2004893119 cites W2037455308 @default.
• W2004893119 cites W2040083276 @default.
• W2004893119 cites W2040370941 @default.
• W2004893119 cites W2042061647 @default.
• W2004893119 cites W2044514466 @default.
• W2004893119 cites W2044644910 @default.
• W2004893119 cites W2047912023 @default.
• W2004893119 cites W2051976691 @default.
• W2004893119 cites W2054931962 @default.
• W2004893119 cites W2055537521 @default.
• W2004893119 cites W2066822063 @default.
• W2004893119 cites W2067377776 @default.
• W2004893119 cites W2068729840 @default.
• W2004893119 cites W2071204998 @default.
• W2004893119 cites W2077946413 @default.
• W2004893119 cites W2079468763 @default.
• W2004893119 cites W2086173688 @default.
• W2004893119 cites W2088783942 @default.
• W2004893119 cites W2107638293 @default.
• W2004893119 cites W2111546522 @default.
• W2004893119 cites W2112662716 @default.
• W2004893119 cites W2122372991 @default.
• W2004893119 cites W2124752113 @default.
• W2004893119 cites W2125229832 @default.
• W2004893119 cites W2125548482 @default.
• W2004893119 cites W2127827194 @default.
• W2004893119 cites W2132401137 @default.
• W2004893119 cites W2134180534 @default.
• W2004893119 cites W2137799157 @default.
• W2004893119 cites W2138757222 @default.
• W2004893119 cites W2158335943 @default.
• W2004893119 cites W2158796348 @default.
• W2004893119 cites W2159212731 @default.
• W2004893119 cites W2169156986 @default.
• W2004893119 cites W2169311094 @default.
• W2004893119 cites W2312965406 @default.
• W2004893119 cites W2316703326 @default.
• W2004893119 cites W2716822650 @default.
• W2004893119 cites W51616355 @default.
• W2004893119 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.12.032" @default.
• W2004893119 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25636388" @default.
• W2004893119 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2004893119 type Work @default.
• W2004893119 sameAs 2004893119 @default.
• W2004893119 citedByCount "59" @default.
• W2004893119 countsByYear W20048931192015 @default.
• W2004893119 countsByYear W20048931192016 @default.
• W2004893119 countsByYear W20048931192017 @default.
• W2004893119 countsByYear W20048931192018 @default.
• W2004893119 countsByYear W20048931192019 @default.
• W2004893119 countsByYear W20048931192020 @default.
• W2004893119 countsByYear W20048931192021 @default.
• W2004893119 countsByYear W20048931192022 @default.
• W2004893119 countsByYear W20048931192023 @default.
• W2004893119 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2004893119 hasAuthorship W2004893119A5012401657 @default.
• W2004893119 hasAuthorship W2004893119A5017536956 @default.
• W2004893119 hasAuthorship W2004893119A5027567559 @default.
• W2004893119 hasAuthorship W2004893119A5034218505 @default.
• W2004893119 hasAuthorship W2004893119A5051597509 @default.
• W2004893119 hasAuthorship W2004893119A5057769816 @default.
• W2004893119 hasAuthorship W2004893119A5064667781 @default.
• W2004893119 hasAuthorship W2004893119A5080510963 @default.
• W2004893119 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2004893119 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2004893119 hasConcept C135691158 @default.
• W2004893119 hasConcept C146957229 @default.
• W2004893119 hasConcept C2778213512 @default.
• W2004893119 hasConcept C2778405248 @default.
• W2004893119 hasConcept C2780441642 @default.

• next