FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2004967422> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2004967422 endingPage "554" @default.
• W2004967422 startingPage "540" @default.
• W2004967422 abstract "To identify consistent provision of clinical preventive services, we sought to benchmark all acute care Veterans Affairs Medical Centers (VAMCs) against each other nationally on the basis of multiple evidence-based, performance measures to identify facilities performing consistently higher and lower than expected.The 1998 Veterans Health Survey assessed the self-reported delivery of evidence-based clinical preventive services in a stratified national sample of 450 ambulatory care patients seen at each VAMC. Proportions appropriately receiving each service within the recommended time interval were calculated for 138 VAMCs. Percentile ranks for each outcome were assigned. Two approaches were used for benchmarking performance. First, a scaled score for each facility was calculated across the set of 12 measures. Second, facilities were ranked based on the sum of the percentile ranks over a range of specific high cutoffs (eg, 70-80%) and above a range of lower cutoffs (eg, 40-50%). Ranking was validated by comparing with deciles of ranks on chart audit (External Peer Review Program, EPRP) data using Kendall's tau-b and chi2 quality-of-fit test. Differences between consistently high adherence (CHA) and low adherence (CLA) facilities were compared using the Wilcoxon rank sum test on 14 VHS and 11 EPRP outcomes.Data from 39,939 patients (67% response rate) were examined. In combination, cutoffs of greater than 50th percentile and greater than 75th percentile rank yielded 12 of 14 VHS and 6 of 11 EPRP measures different between CHA and CLA facilities. The scaled-score approach resulted in 20 CHA and 14 CLA facilities. The sum of outcomes ranked above 50th percentile and over 75th percentile for CHA facilities (n = 17) was 15 or more. The sum of outcomes ranked above the same cutoffs for CLA facilities (n = 16) was 3 or less. EPRP and 1998 VHS data demonstrated that the survey measures and benchmarking approaches were both reliable and valid. Both approaches resulted in multiple differences between CHA and CLA facilities; differences were greater using the percentile rank approach.The VA has successfully encouraged adoption of evidence-based clinical preventive services throughout its health care system. However, facilities show wide variation in their levels of delivery and can be distinguished on the basis of their consistently high or low levels of adherence. Examining service delivery across multiple performance indicators allows identification of opportunities to improve clinical practice guideline implementation and the delivery of preventive services. This approach identifies model institutions where focused investigation of factors associated with consistent performance may be particularly fruitful." @default.
• W2004967422 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2004967422 creator A5006583023 @default.
• W2004967422 creator A5012287818 @default.
• W2004967422 creator A5018330470 @default.
• W2004967422 creator A5032129509 @default.
• W2004967422 creator A5036176385 @default.
• W2004967422 creator A5051065895 @default.
• W2004967422 creator A5063727898 @default.
• W2004967422 creator A5069421572 @default.
• W2004967422 creator A5070622625 @default.
• W2004967422 date "2002-06-01" @default.
• W2004967422 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2004967422 title "Benchmarking Veterans Affairs Medical Centers in the Delivery of Preventive Health Services" @default.
• W2004967422 cites W1967603166 @default.
• W2004967422 cites W1969899003 @default.
• W2004967422 cites W1982335485 @default.
• W2004967422 cites W1994441797 @default.
• W2004967422 cites W2009616364 @default.
• W2004967422 cites W2016677237 @default.
• W2004967422 cites W2017141403 @default.
• W2004967422 cites W2028094518 @default.
• W2004967422 cites W2033881591 @default.
• W2004967422 cites W2034369279 @default.
• W2004967422 cites W2041664561 @default.
• W2004967422 cites W2047075533 @default.
• W2004967422 cites W2057150320 @default.
• W2004967422 cites W2058305649 @default.
• W2004967422 cites W2062670579 @default.
• W2004967422 cites W2066015107 @default.
• W2004967422 cites W2067807558 @default.
• W2004967422 cites W2070415177 @default.
• W2004967422 cites W2074162245 @default.
• W2004967422 cites W2083760080 @default.
• W2004967422 cites W2092582371 @default.
• W2004967422 cites W2092717000 @default.
• W2004967422 cites W2155130216 @default.
• W2004967422 cites W2155301044 @default.
• W2004967422 cites W2170077404 @default.
• W2004967422 cites W2330361542 @default.
• W2004967422 cites W2335093665 @default.
• W2004967422 cites W2408696829 @default.
• W2004967422 cites W3144776050 @default.
• W2004967422 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-200206000-00011" @default.
• W2004967422 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12021680" @default.
• W2004967422 hasPublicationYear "2002" @default.
• W2004967422 type Work @default.
• W2004967422 sameAs 2004967422 @default.
• W2004967422 citedByCount "36" @default.
• W2004967422 countsByYear W20049674222012 @default.
• W2004967422 countsByYear W20049674222015 @default.
• W2004967422 countsByYear W20049674222016 @default.
• W2004967422 countsByYear W20049674222018 @default.
• W2004967422 countsByYear W20049674222021 @default.
• W2004967422 countsByYear W20049674222022 @default.
• W2004967422 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2004967422 hasAuthorship W2004967422A5006583023 @default.
• W2004967422 hasAuthorship W2004967422A5012287818 @default.
• W2004967422 hasAuthorship W2004967422A5018330470 @default.
• W2004967422 hasAuthorship W2004967422A5032129509 @default.
• W2004967422 hasAuthorship W2004967422A5036176385 @default.
• W2004967422 hasAuthorship W2004967422A5051065895 @default.
• W2004967422 hasAuthorship W2004967422A5063727898 @default.
• W2004967422 hasAuthorship W2004967422A5069421572 @default.
• W2004967422 hasAuthorship W2004967422A5070622625 @default.
• W2004967422 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2004967422 hasConcept C122048520 @default.
• W2004967422 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2004967422 hasConcept C12868164 @default.
• W2004967422 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2004967422 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W2004967422 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2004967422 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W2004967422 hasConcept C206041023 @default.
• W2004967422 hasConcept C2775969662 @default.
• W2004967422 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2004967422 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W2004967422 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W2004967422 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2004967422 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2004967422 hasConcept C86251818 @default.
• W2004967422 hasConceptScore W2004967422C105795698 @default.
• W2004967422 hasConceptScore W2004967422C122048520 @default.
• W2004967422 hasConceptScore W2004967422C126322002 @default.
• W2004967422 hasConceptScore W2004967422C12868164 @default.
• W2004967422 hasConceptScore W2004967422C144133560 @default.
• W2004967422 hasConceptScore W2004967422C160735492 @default.
• W2004967422 hasConceptScore W2004967422C162324750 @default.
• W2004967422 hasConceptScore W2004967422C162853370 @default.
• W2004967422 hasConceptScore W2004967422C206041023 @default.
• W2004967422 hasConceptScore W2004967422C2775969662 @default.
• W2004967422 hasConceptScore W2004967422C33923547 @default.
• W2004967422 hasConceptScore W2004967422C44249647 @default.
• W2004967422 hasConceptScore W2004967422C50522688 @default.
• W2004967422 hasConceptScore W2004967422C512399662 @default.
• W2004967422 hasConceptScore W2004967422C71924100 @default.
• W2004967422 hasConceptScore W2004967422C86251818 @default.
• W2004967422 hasIssue "6" @default.

• next