FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2004990510> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2004990510 endingPage "103" @default.
• W2004990510 startingPage "93" @default.
• W2004990510 abstract "The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effects of volume weight (VW; g/L), processing method (PM; control vs. precision processing [PP]), and processing index (PI; VW after rolling/VW before rolling) of barley grain on in situ ruminal kinetics and in vitro intestinal digestion. The study was designed as a 2 × 2 × 2 factorial arrangement of treatments: VW (low vs. high), PM (control vs. PP) and PI (0.75 vs. 0.85). Ten barley samples, 5 low (580 g/L) and 5 high (680 g/L) VW, were either dry-rolled with a single roller setting (control) or screened into two fractions of small or large kernels using a 4-mm sieve, and then dry-rolled (i.e., PP). Each sample was dry-rolled moderately or coarsely with PI of 0.75 or 0.85. Three beef heifers (650 ± 25.5 kg body weight) fitted with rumen cannulas and fed a diet consisting of 700 g/kg barley silage and 300 g/kg concentrate mix (dry matter [DM] basis) were used for the in situ study. In situ degradation kinetics of DM and starch were estimated after 0, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 48 h of ruminal incubation. Data from DM and starch degradation at different times of incubation were fitted to a model y = a + b(1 − e−c(t−L)). in vitro intestinal disappearances of DM and starch of ruminal residue after 12 h of incubation were determined using a modified three-step procedure. Interactions between VW and PM on effective degradability (ED; P<0.01) and between PM and PI on the degradation kinetics (P<0.05) were observed. The VW of barley grain did not affect the degradation kinetics of DM and starch whereas ED of DM was greater (P<0.01) in high versus low VW in the control samples. For in situ DM disappearance, a (P<0.01) and b (P<0.07) fractions were lower, but c and ED were higher (P<0.01) in PP versus control samples. Increased processing of barley consistently resulted in greater (P<0.01) values of degradation kinetics and ED compared with less processed barley. Intestinal DM disappearance of rumen residues was affected by all three factors (VW, PM and PI). Regression results showed that the rate of DM disappearance was correlated to the particle size distribution and the fine particles were the primary predictor. The results demonstrated that the PP approach and manipulating PI are effective ways to optimize rumen digestion of barley grain. This suggests that a concise and reliable method to predict rumen digestion of barley may be developed based on measuring the fines content of processed barley." @default.
• W2004990510 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2004990510 creator A5007515097 @default.
• W2004990510 creator A5036858383 @default.
• W2004990510 creator A5042633786 @default.
• W2004990510 creator A5059153561 @default.
• W2004990510 creator A5078002699 @default.
• W2004990510 creator A5084567284 @default.
• W2004990510 creator A5089130004 @default.
• W2004990510 date "2015-01-01" @default.
• W2004990510 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
• W2004990510 title "Effects of volume weight, processing method and processing index of barley grain on in situ digestibility of dry matter and starch in beef heifers" @default.
• W2004990510 cites W1207566051 @default.
• W2004990510 cites W127215685 @default.
• W2004990510 cites W14277872 @default.
• W2004990510 cites W1485834744 @default.
• W2004990510 cites W149062816 @default.
• W2004990510 cites W1558365236 @default.
• W2004990510 cites W16387554 @default.
• W2004990510 cites W1834135159 @default.
• W2004990510 cites W1970833760 @default.
• W2004990510 cites W1989862589 @default.
• W2004990510 cites W1997087247 @default.
• W2004990510 cites W1997483627 @default.
• W2004990510 cites W2007460961 @default.
• W2004990510 cites W2021061092 @default.
• W2004990510 cites W2057917368 @default.
• W2004990510 cites W2067407392 @default.
• W2004990510 cites W2071113521 @default.
• W2004990510 cites W2081870068 @default.
• W2004990510 cites W2099213629 @default.
• W2004990510 cites W2129432022 @default.
• W2004990510 cites W2130956634 @default.
• W2004990510 cites W2164366449 @default.
• W2004990510 cites W319114688 @default.
• W2004990510 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2014.11.005" @default.
• W2004990510 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2004990510 type Work @default.
• W2004990510 sameAs 2004990510 @default.
• W2004990510 citedByCount "13" @default.
• W2004990510 countsByYear W20049905102015 @default.
• W2004990510 countsByYear W20049905102016 @default.
• W2004990510 countsByYear W20049905102017 @default.
• W2004990510 countsByYear W20049905102018 @default.
• W2004990510 countsByYear W20049905102020 @default.
• W2004990510 countsByYear W20049905102021 @default.
• W2004990510 countsByYear W20049905102023 @default.
• W2004990510 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2004990510 hasAuthorship W2004990510A5007515097 @default.
• W2004990510 hasAuthorship W2004990510A5036858383 @default.
• W2004990510 hasAuthorship W2004990510A5042633786 @default.
• W2004990510 hasAuthorship W2004990510A5059153561 @default.
• W2004990510 hasAuthorship W2004990510A5078002699 @default.
• W2004990510 hasAuthorship W2004990510A5084567284 @default.
• W2004990510 hasAuthorship W2004990510A5089130004 @default.
• W2004990510 hasConcept C100544194 @default.
• W2004990510 hasConcept C114614502 @default.
• W2004990510 hasConcept C140793950 @default.
• W2004990510 hasConcept C17732976 @default.
• W2004990510 hasConcept C178790620 @default.
• W2004990510 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2004990510 hasConcept C25642318 @default.
• W2004990510 hasConcept C2776544680 @default.
• W2004990510 hasConcept C2777822432 @default.
• W2004990510 hasConcept C2780138947 @default.
• W2004990510 hasConcept C2781338088 @default.
• W2004990510 hasConcept C2781357212 @default.
• W2004990510 hasConcept C31903555 @default.
• W2004990510 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2004990510 hasConcept C43617362 @default.
• W2004990510 hasConcept C529335014 @default.
• W2004990510 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W2004990510 hasConcept C70262065 @default.
• W2004990510 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2004990510 hasConceptScore W2004990510C100544194 @default.
• W2004990510 hasConceptScore W2004990510C114614502 @default.
• W2004990510 hasConceptScore W2004990510C140793950 @default.
• W2004990510 hasConceptScore W2004990510C17732976 @default.
• W2004990510 hasConceptScore W2004990510C178790620 @default.
• W2004990510 hasConceptScore W2004990510C185592680 @default.
• W2004990510 hasConceptScore W2004990510C25642318 @default.
• W2004990510 hasConceptScore W2004990510C2776544680 @default.
• W2004990510 hasConceptScore W2004990510C2777822432 @default.
• W2004990510 hasConceptScore W2004990510C2780138947 @default.
• W2004990510 hasConceptScore W2004990510C2781338088 @default.
• W2004990510 hasConceptScore W2004990510C2781357212 @default.
• W2004990510 hasConceptScore W2004990510C31903555 @default.
• W2004990510 hasConceptScore W2004990510C33923547 @default.
• W2004990510 hasConceptScore W2004990510C43617362 @default.
• W2004990510 hasConceptScore W2004990510C529335014 @default.
• W2004990510 hasConceptScore W2004990510C55493867 @default.
• W2004990510 hasConceptScore W2004990510C70262065 @default.
• W2004990510 hasConceptScore W2004990510C86803240 @default.
• W2004990510 hasFunder F4320310239 @default.
• W2004990510 hasLocation W20049905101 @default.
• W2004990510 hasOpenAccess W2004990510 @default.
• W2004990510 hasPrimaryLocation W20049905101 @default.
• W2004990510 hasRelatedWork W1969001684 @default.

• next