FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2005034154> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2005034154 endingPage "335" @default.
• W2005034154 startingPage "327" @default.
• W2005034154 abstract "Six ponies divided into two groups of three were used in a double crossover study design. Group 1 ponies had a small intestinal resection and anastomosis performed using a biofragmentable anastomosis ring (BAR); group 2 ponies had a hand-sewn small intestinal resection and anastomosis using a Gambee suture pattern. Approximately 30 days later, all ponies had a second celiotomy and anastomosed segments were removed. Group 1 ponies had a hand-sewn anastomosis performed and group 2 had a BAR. The anastomotic sites were collected at necropsy approximately 30 days later. Anastomosed intestinal segments were evaluated with ultrasound to determine lumen diameter, area, circumference, and wall thickness. Gross descriptions of adhesions were recorded and sections of the anastomotic site were taken for histological evaluation. Time to perform the BAR anastomosis was significantly less (P = .0004) than for the hand-sewn Gambee anastomosis. Ponies with handsewn anastomoses had no signs of colic, whereas five of six ponies with BAR anastomoses had several episodes of abdominal discomfort, between day 16 to 18, corresponding to the time of BAR disintegration as determined by abdominal radiographs. Hand-sewn anastomoses had a tendency to have more adhesion formation than BAR anastomoses, but all anastomoses, except one BAR anastomosis, were graded as having a low obstructive potential. BAR anastomoses had a significantly larger mean index of stenosis for intraluminal diameter (76% +/- 13.6), area (93.7% +/- 6.01) and circumference (75.8% +/- 14.0) than the hand-sewn anastomoses (26.6% +/- 11.9; 44.6% +/- 19.5; 26.8% +/- 12.7). The BAR anastomoses also had a significantly smaller mean intraluminal diameter (0.96 cm +/- 0.49), area (0.838 cm2 +/- 0.65) and circumference (3.28 cm +/- 1.63) than the hand sewn anastomoses (3.11 cm +/- 0.73; 7.99 cm2 +/- 3.9; 10.3 cm +/- 2.47). In addition, the BAR anastomoses had a significantly larger (P = .0069) bowel wall thickness at the anastomoses and a significantly larger (P = .047) wall thickness proximal to the anastomosis than the hand-sewn anastomoses, indicating some degree of hypertrophy because of chronic obstruction. No significant difference was found in the diameter, area, or circumference between bowel proximal and distal to the anastomosis for either the BAR or Gambee techniques, or between the BAR and Gambee anastomosis as a measure of chronic obstruction. There was a significantly higher (P = .0043) histological score (worse healing) for mucosal healing and continuity for the BAR, as well as a tendency to score higher for inflammation, anastomotic alignment, and anastomotic fibrosis. The BAR technique had a significantly higher (P = .0043) total histological score than the Gambee technique. Although the BAR was advantageous in many respects, results of this study suggest that it should not be used for equine small intestinal anastomosis because of the potential for stricture formation." @default.
• W2005034154 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2005034154 creator A5031013029 @default.
• W2005034154 creator A5053851957 @default.
• W2005034154 creator A5055325176 @default.
• W2005034154 creator A5055874439 @default.
• W2005034154 date "1996-07-01" @default.
• W2005034154 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2005034154 title "Evaluation of a Biofragmentable Anastomosis Ring for Small Intestinal Anastomosis in Ponies" @default.
• W2005034154 cites W1974300621 @default.
• W2005034154 cites W1986499873 @default.
• W2005034154 cites W2019465473 @default.
• W2005034154 cites W2022490937 @default.
• W2005034154 cites W2026278238 @default.
• W2005034154 cites W2034089267 @default.
• W2005034154 cites W2062168320 @default.
• W2005034154 cites W2066258005 @default.
• W2005034154 cites W2066896095 @default.
• W2005034154 cites W2092149003 @default.
• W2005034154 cites W2314375320 @default.
• W2005034154 cites W2322270052 @default.
• W2005034154 cites W2912111488 @default.
• W2005034154 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950x.1996.tb01421.x" @default.
• W2005034154 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8810023" @default.
• W2005034154 hasPublicationYear "1996" @default.
• W2005034154 type Work @default.
• W2005034154 sameAs 2005034154 @default.
• W2005034154 citedByCount "6" @default.
• W2005034154 countsByYear W20050341542021 @default.
• W2005034154 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2005034154 hasAuthorship W2005034154A5031013029 @default.
• W2005034154 hasAuthorship W2005034154A5053851957 @default.
• W2005034154 hasAuthorship W2005034154A5055325176 @default.
• W2005034154 hasAuthorship W2005034154A5055874439 @default.
• W2005034154 hasConcept C105702510 @default.
• W2005034154 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2005034154 hasConcept C131631996 @default.
• W2005034154 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2005034154 hasConcept C166504685 @default.
• W2005034154 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W2005034154 hasConcept C2777327002 @default.
• W2005034154 hasConcept C2780007028 @default.
• W2005034154 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2005034154 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2005034154 hasConcept C8443397 @default.
• W2005034154 hasConceptScore W2005034154C105702510 @default.
• W2005034154 hasConceptScore W2005034154C126838900 @default.
• W2005034154 hasConceptScore W2005034154C131631996 @default.
• W2005034154 hasConceptScore W2005034154C141071460 @default.
• W2005034154 hasConceptScore W2005034154C166504685 @default.
• W2005034154 hasConceptScore W2005034154C2524010 @default.
• W2005034154 hasConceptScore W2005034154C2777327002 @default.
• W2005034154 hasConceptScore W2005034154C2780007028 @default.
• W2005034154 hasConceptScore W2005034154C33923547 @default.
• W2005034154 hasConceptScore W2005034154C71924100 @default.
• W2005034154 hasConceptScore W2005034154C8443397 @default.
• W2005034154 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2005034154 hasLocation W20050341541 @default.
• W2005034154 hasLocation W20050341542 @default.
• W2005034154 hasOpenAccess W2005034154 @default.
• W2005034154 hasPrimaryLocation W20050341541 @default.
• W2005034154 hasRelatedWork W1974300621 @default.
• W2005034154 hasRelatedWork W2025428574 @default.
• W2005034154 hasRelatedWork W2089538739 @default.
• W2005034154 hasRelatedWork W2130666200 @default.
• W2005034154 hasRelatedWork W2381228102 @default.
• W2005034154 hasRelatedWork W2399187619 @default.
• W2005034154 hasRelatedWork W2417536767 @default.
• W2005034154 hasRelatedWork W2417546993 @default.
• W2005034154 hasRelatedWork W2434140900 @default.
• W2005034154 hasRelatedWork W4301489211 @default.
• W2005034154 hasVolume "25" @default.
• W2005034154 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2005034154 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2005034154 magId "2005034154" @default.
• W2005034154 workType "article" @default.