Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2005114525> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 74 of
74
with 100 items per page.
- W2005114525 endingPage "24" @default.
- W2005114525 startingPage "17" @default.
- W2005114525 abstract "<h2>Abstract</h2> The aim of this project was to study how the isometrical neck extensor strength varies at different joint angles in the sagittal plane in order to calculate what fractions of the maximum strength are used in sitting postures to counteract the load moment induced by the weight of the head and neck segments. Ten female subjects sat with the torso fixed in a special device. The resistive force during maximum neck extension was recorded with a strain gauge in four different positions of the lower cervical spine; extended, vertical, slightly flexed and much flexed. For each of these four positions the upper cervical spine was kept in three positions—flexed, neutral and extended. Moments of force about the bilateral motion axes of the atlanto-occipital (Occ-C<sub>1</sub>) joint and the C<sub>7</sub>-T<sub>1</sub> motion segment were calculated. Moment arms were measured from video images. The maximum muscular moment for Occ-C<sub>1</sub> did not vary systematically, either with different positions of the lower or upper cervical spine. The mean neck extensor strength for C<sub>7</sub>-T, was lowest in the extended lower cervical spine position. In the vertical, slightly flexed or much flexed position little or no variation in strength was seen. However, the fraction of the strength (% MUR) utilized to counteract the load moment induced by the weight of the head and neck in the different postures showed higher utilization ratios when the head-and-neck was flexed (about 10 and 17% MUR, respectively) than when it was kept in a vertical position (about 2% MUR). The results strongly indicate that the flexed cervical spine position produces higher muscular load than vertical, even when taking muscular strength into account, and should thus be avoided during prolonged sitting." @default.
- W2005114525 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2005114525 creator A5022834511 @default.
- W2005114525 creator A5050436270 @default.
- W2005114525 date "1989-02-01" @default.
- W2005114525 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
- W2005114525 title "Maximum neck extension strength and relative neck muscular load in different cervical spine positions" @default.
- W2005114525 cites W1991565925 @default.
- W2005114525 cites W2028502410 @default.
- W2005114525 cites W2036663568 @default.
- W2005114525 cites W2047537599 @default.
- W2005114525 cites W2113121090 @default.
- W2005114525 cites W2134688714 @default.
- W2005114525 cites W2156317742 @default.
- W2005114525 cites W2335237841 @default.
- W2005114525 cites W2466575467 @default.
- W2005114525 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/0268-0033(89)90063-6" @default.
- W2005114525 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23915955" @default.
- W2005114525 hasPublicationYear "1989" @default.
- W2005114525 type Work @default.
- W2005114525 sameAs 2005114525 @default.
- W2005114525 citedByCount "30" @default.
- W2005114525 countsByYear W20051145252015 @default.
- W2005114525 countsByYear W20051145252019 @default.
- W2005114525 countsByYear W20051145252022 @default.
- W2005114525 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2005114525 hasAuthorship W2005114525A5022834511 @default.
- W2005114525 hasAuthorship W2005114525A5050436270 @default.
- W2005114525 hasConcept C103486182 @default.
- W2005114525 hasConcept C105702510 @default.
- W2005114525 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W2005114525 hasConcept C178910020 @default.
- W2005114525 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
- W2005114525 hasConcept C2776944266 @default.
- W2005114525 hasConcept C2910045404 @default.
- W2005114525 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
- W2005114525 hasConcept C2985379065 @default.
- W2005114525 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W2005114525 hasConcept C523889960 @default.
- W2005114525 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2005114525 hasConceptScore W2005114525C103486182 @default.
- W2005114525 hasConceptScore W2005114525C105702510 @default.
- W2005114525 hasConceptScore W2005114525C141071460 @default.
- W2005114525 hasConceptScore W2005114525C178910020 @default.
- W2005114525 hasConceptScore W2005114525C1862650 @default.
- W2005114525 hasConceptScore W2005114525C2776944266 @default.
- W2005114525 hasConceptScore W2005114525C2910045404 @default.
- W2005114525 hasConceptScore W2005114525C29694066 @default.
- W2005114525 hasConceptScore W2005114525C2985379065 @default.
- W2005114525 hasConceptScore W2005114525C33923547 @default.
- W2005114525 hasConceptScore W2005114525C523889960 @default.
- W2005114525 hasConceptScore W2005114525C71924100 @default.
- W2005114525 hasIssue "1" @default.
- W2005114525 hasLocation W20051145251 @default.
- W2005114525 hasLocation W20051145252 @default.
- W2005114525 hasOpenAccess W2005114525 @default.
- W2005114525 hasPrimaryLocation W20051145251 @default.
- W2005114525 hasRelatedWork W1966443355 @default.
- W2005114525 hasRelatedWork W1974063320 @default.
- W2005114525 hasRelatedWork W2005114525 @default.
- W2005114525 hasRelatedWork W2019922006 @default.
- W2005114525 hasRelatedWork W2027285992 @default.
- W2005114525 hasRelatedWork W2134688714 @default.
- W2005114525 hasRelatedWork W2594508860 @default.
- W2005114525 hasRelatedWork W2793704908 @default.
- W2005114525 hasRelatedWork W2979112281 @default.
- W2005114525 hasRelatedWork W75778724 @default.
- W2005114525 hasVolume "4" @default.
- W2005114525 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2005114525 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2005114525 magId "2005114525" @default.
- W2005114525 workType "article" @default.