FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2005661096> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2005661096 endingPage "398" @default.
• W2005661096 startingPage "377" @default.
• W2005661096 abstract "Purpose The purpose of the study is to test how land owners respond to the appreciation of land values in the presence of speculation. This paper introduces the concept of “land hoarding,” which is land owners' response to higher land prices by selling more land up to a point beyond which accelerated land price appreciation would lead to land hoarding. Specifically, this paper examines the effect of land value appreciation higher than the opportunity cost of selling the land (measured by treasury‐bill (T‐bill) rate) on land sale and land hoarding. Design/methodology/approach A theoretical framework is developed to understand the demand for agricultural land retention with and without speculation, the former informing land hoarding behavior. A linear regression model was introduced and estimated using ordinary least square (OLS) method. A panel data model and analysis is also introduced, and following appropriate model selection tests, a fixed effect panel data estimation method is implemented. Data from 48 states, spanning from 1950 to 2004, are utilized. Findings An inverse relationship is found between the rate of land value appreciation and the demand for land by farmers, suggesting that the standard direct relationship between appreciation and land supplied to development holds. However, the additional finding of an inverse relationship between the rate of land value appreciation in excess of the risk‐free rate of return and agricultural land development confirms the existence of an identifiable speculative demand component that involves land hoarding. Practical implications To the extent to which the findings are broadly applicable, one policy implication is that enhanced land retention can be achieved through market mechanisms. For example, the notion that reduced T‐bill rates can actually result in market triggered land preservation is an interesting policy related finding. Equally interesting is the notion that policies that can trigger increases in the rate of appreciation of farmland may also potentially result in the agricultural hoarding of land. Obviously, enhanced profitability in agriculture due to programs targeting viability, commodity price support, reduction of regulation or market expansion programs can potentially affect land retention. Originality/value This paper introduces the “land hoarding hypothesis.” High rates of land appreciation can be expected to signal that holding the land may yield better returns than selling it, suggesting that if rates of land appreciation become significantly high enough, farmers may begin to hoard land, not sell it, to maximize long‐term returns. This concept can be valuable to market‐based agricultural land retention programs at the urban fringe. By linking speculative behavior, land demand and existence of a hoarding behavior under some conditions, this paper adds value and originality to the literature." @default.
• W2005661096 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2005661096 creator A5004054154 @default.
• W2005661096 creator A5009155588 @default.
• W2005661096 creator A5038016496 @default.
• W2005661096 creator A5064169138 @default.
• W2005661096 date "2010-11-09" @default.
• W2005661096 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2005661096 title "Evidence of land hoarding behavior in US agriculture" @default.
• W2005661096 cites W1591654852 @default.
• W2005661096 cites W1646704973 @default.
• W2005661096 cites W1686926298 @default.
• W2005661096 cites W1971956622 @default.
• W2005661096 cites W2045432778 @default.
• W2005661096 cites W2078894925 @default.
• W2005661096 cites W2080422257 @default.
• W2005661096 cites W2089281560 @default.
• W2005661096 cites W2107452064 @default.
• W2005661096 cites W2129093219 @default.
• W2005661096 cites W2129562177 @default.
• W2005661096 cites W2151843738 @default.
• W2005661096 cites W3125527597 @default.
• W2005661096 doi "https://doi.org/10.1108/00021461011088503" @default.
• W2005661096 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W2005661096 type Work @default.
• W2005661096 sameAs 2005661096 @default.
• W2005661096 citedByCount "7" @default.
• W2005661096 countsByYear W20056610962014 @default.
• W2005661096 countsByYear W20056610962015 @default.
• W2005661096 countsByYear W20056610962019 @default.
• W2005661096 countsByYear W20056610962021 @default.
• W2005661096 countsByYear W20056610962022 @default.
• W2005661096 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2005661096 hasAuthorship W2005661096A5004054154 @default.
• W2005661096 hasAuthorship W2005661096A5009155588 @default.
• W2005661096 hasAuthorship W2005661096A5038016496 @default.
• W2005661096 hasAuthorship W2005661096A5064169138 @default.
• W2005661096 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2005661096 hasConcept C118518473 @default.
• W2005661096 hasConcept C139719470 @default.
• W2005661096 hasConcept C149782125 @default.
• W2005661096 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2005661096 hasConcept C165287380 @default.
• W2005661096 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W2005661096 hasConcept C175605778 @default.
• W2005661096 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W2005661096 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W2005661096 hasConcept C2776291640 @default.
• W2005661096 hasConcept C2781092381 @default.
• W2005661096 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2005661096 hasConcept C4792198 @default.
• W2005661096 hasConcept C47941915 @default.
• W2005661096 hasConcept C48824518 @default.
• W2005661096 hasConcept C502990516 @default.
• W2005661096 hasConcept C6422946 @default.
• W2005661096 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2005661096 hasConcept C99656134 @default.
• W2005661096 hasConceptScore W2005661096C105795698 @default.
• W2005661096 hasConceptScore W2005661096C118518473 @default.
• W2005661096 hasConceptScore W2005661096C139719470 @default.
• W2005661096 hasConceptScore W2005661096C149782125 @default.
• W2005661096 hasConceptScore W2005661096C162324750 @default.
• W2005661096 hasConceptScore W2005661096C165287380 @default.
• W2005661096 hasConceptScore W2005661096C166957645 @default.
• W2005661096 hasConceptScore W2005661096C175605778 @default.
• W2005661096 hasConceptScore W2005661096C18903297 @default.
• W2005661096 hasConceptScore W2005661096C205649164 @default.
• W2005661096 hasConceptScore W2005661096C2776291640 @default.
• W2005661096 hasConceptScore W2005661096C2781092381 @default.
• W2005661096 hasConceptScore W2005661096C33923547 @default.
• W2005661096 hasConceptScore W2005661096C4792198 @default.
• W2005661096 hasConceptScore W2005661096C47941915 @default.
• W2005661096 hasConceptScore W2005661096C48824518 @default.
• W2005661096 hasConceptScore W2005661096C502990516 @default.
• W2005661096 hasConceptScore W2005661096C6422946 @default.
• W2005661096 hasConceptScore W2005661096C86803240 @default.
• W2005661096 hasConceptScore W2005661096C99656134 @default.
• W2005661096 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2005661096 hasLocation W20056610961 @default.
• W2005661096 hasOpenAccess W2005661096 @default.
• W2005661096 hasPrimaryLocation W20056610961 @default.
• W2005661096 hasRelatedWork W2005661096 @default.
• W2005661096 hasRelatedWork W2055415962 @default.
• W2005661096 hasRelatedWork W2139315275 @default.
• W2005661096 hasRelatedWork W2381666467 @default.
• W2005661096 hasRelatedWork W2386895414 @default.
• W2005661096 hasRelatedWork W2393556660 @default.
• W2005661096 hasRelatedWork W2727455198 @default.
• W2005661096 hasRelatedWork W3123949494 @default.
• W2005661096 hasRelatedWork W3213152515 @default.
• W2005661096 hasRelatedWork W4312705653 @default.
• W2005661096 hasVolume "70" @default.
• W2005661096 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2005661096 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2005661096 magId "2005661096" @default.
• W2005661096 workType "article" @default.