FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2005736259> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2005736259 endingPage "2292" @default.
• W2005736259 startingPage "2287" @default.
• W2005736259 abstract "PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy and precision of the contact lens overrefraction (CLO) method in determining corneal refractive power in post-refractive-surgery eyes. SETTING: Refractive Surgery Service and Contact Lens Service, University of Illinois, Chicago, Illinois, USA. METHODS: Fourteen eyes of 7 subjects who had a single myopic laser in situ keratomileusis procedure within 12 months with refractive stability were included in this prospective case series. The CLO method was compared with the historical method of predicting the corneal power using 4 different lens fitting strategies and 3 refractive pupil scan sizes (3 mm, 5 mm, and total pupil). Rigid lenses included 3 9.0 mm overall diameter lenses fit flat, steep, and an average of the 2, and a 15.0 mm diameter lens steep fit. Cycloplegic CLO was performed using the autorefractor function of the Nidek OPD-Scan ARK-10000. Results with each strategy were compared with the corneal power estimated with the historical method. The bias (mean of the difference), 95% limits of agreement, and difference versus mean plots for each strategy are presented. RESULTS: In each subject, the CLO-estimated corneal power varied based on lens fit. On average, the bias between CLO and historical methods ranged from −0.38 to +2.42 diopters (D) and was significantly different from 0 in all but 3 strategies. Substantial variability in precision existed between fitting strategies, with the range of the 95% limits of agreement approximating 0.50 D in 2 strategies and 2.59 D in the worst-case scenario. The least precise fitting strategy was use of flat-fitting 9.0 mm diameter lenses. CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy and precision of the CLO method of estimating corneal power in post-refractive-surgery eyes was highly variable on the basis of how rigid lense were fit. One of the most commonly used fitting strategies in clinical practice—flat-fitting a 9.0 diameter lens—resulted in the poorest accuracy and precision. Results also suggest use of large-diameter lenses may improve outcomes." @default.
• W2005736259 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2005736259 creator A5029159944 @default.
• W2005736259 creator A5034648190 @default.
• W2005736259 creator A5059907209 @default.
• W2005736259 date "2005-12-01" @default.
• W2005736259 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2005736259 title "Contact lens overrefraction variability in corneal power estimation after refractive surgery" @default.
• W2005736259 cites W118766449 @default.
• W2005736259 cites W1255056007 @default.
• W2005736259 cites W1257100539 @default.
• W2005736259 cites W1543360531 @default.
• W2005736259 cites W1900568354 @default.
• W2005736259 cites W1966909965 @default.
• W2005736259 cites W1969496958 @default.
• W2005736259 cites W1974379645 @default.
• W2005736259 cites W1979332834 @default.
• W2005736259 cites W1984534565 @default.
• W2005736259 cites W2008512934 @default.
• W2005736259 cites W2015795623 @default.
• W2005736259 cites W2019430290 @default.
• W2005736259 cites W2019784015 @default.
• W2005736259 cites W2042237102 @default.
• W2005736259 cites W2050554474 @default.
• W2005736259 cites W2051717042 @default.
• W2005736259 cites W2058133575 @default.
• W2005736259 cites W2068086993 @default.
• W2005736259 cites W2069027196 @default.
• W2005736259 cites W2073850369 @default.
• W2005736259 cites W2077721550 @default.
• W2005736259 cites W2087261754 @default.
• W2005736259 cites W2095901865 @default.
• W2005736259 cites W2104874148 @default.
• W2005736259 cites W2120843511 @default.
• W2005736259 cites W2130816196 @default.
• W2005736259 cites W2136651887 @default.
• W2005736259 cites W2145725094 @default.
• W2005736259 cites W2152898870 @default.
• W2005736259 cites W2164959811 @default.
• W2005736259 cites W2247386566 @default.
• W2005736259 cites W2307952692 @default.
• W2005736259 cites W2330787599 @default.
• W2005736259 cites W2337157158 @default.
• W2005736259 cites W2418049010 @default.
• W2005736259 cites W4211064222 @default.
• W2005736259 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.06.049" @default.
• W2005736259 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16473219" @default.
• W2005736259 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
• W2005736259 type Work @default.
• W2005736259 sameAs 2005736259 @default.
• W2005736259 citedByCount "7" @default.
• W2005736259 countsByYear W20057362592016 @default.
• W2005736259 countsByYear W20057362592017 @default.
• W2005736259 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2005736259 hasAuthorship W2005736259A5029159944 @default.
• W2005736259 hasAuthorship W2005736259A5034648190 @default.
• W2005736259 hasAuthorship W2005736259A5059907209 @default.
• W2005736259 hasConcept C118487528 @default.
• W2005736259 hasConcept C119767625 @default.
• W2005736259 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W2005736259 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2005736259 hasConcept C15336307 @default.
• W2005736259 hasConcept C191161701 @default.
• W2005736259 hasConcept C259533 @default.
• W2005736259 hasConcept C2776882836 @default.
• W2005736259 hasConcept C2778257484 @default.
• W2005736259 hasConcept C2778609529 @default.
• W2005736259 hasConcept C2778887163 @default.
• W2005736259 hasConcept C2780161092 @default.
• W2005736259 hasConcept C2781053140 @default.
• W2005736259 hasConcept C2781135284 @default.
• W2005736259 hasConcept C2986805488 @default.
• W2005736259 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W2005736259 hasConcept C3018577593 @default.
• W2005736259 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2005736259 hasConcept C520434653 @default.
• W2005736259 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2005736259 hasConceptScore W2005736259C118487528 @default.
• W2005736259 hasConceptScore W2005736259C119767625 @default.
• W2005736259 hasConceptScore W2005736259C120665830 @default.
• W2005736259 hasConceptScore W2005736259C121332964 @default.
• W2005736259 hasConceptScore W2005736259C15336307 @default.
• W2005736259 hasConceptScore W2005736259C191161701 @default.
• W2005736259 hasConceptScore W2005736259C259533 @default.
• W2005736259 hasConceptScore W2005736259C2776882836 @default.
• W2005736259 hasConceptScore W2005736259C2778257484 @default.
• W2005736259 hasConceptScore W2005736259C2778609529 @default.
• W2005736259 hasConceptScore W2005736259C2778887163 @default.
• W2005736259 hasConceptScore W2005736259C2780161092 @default.
• W2005736259 hasConceptScore W2005736259C2781053140 @default.
• W2005736259 hasConceptScore W2005736259C2781135284 @default.
• W2005736259 hasConceptScore W2005736259C2986805488 @default.
• W2005736259 hasConceptScore W2005736259C2989005 @default.
• W2005736259 hasConceptScore W2005736259C3018577593 @default.
• W2005736259 hasConceptScore W2005736259C33923547 @default.
• W2005736259 hasConceptScore W2005736259C520434653 @default.
• W2005736259 hasConceptScore W2005736259C71924100 @default.
• W2005736259 hasIssue "12" @default.

• next