FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2005748209> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2005748209 abstract "The intergovernmental pillars of the European Union are areas in continuous evolution. Furthermore, this evolution seems to be towards a more institutionalized co-operation. This is especially obvious within the third pillar, where Pupino, for example, seems to be part of a slow trend of approximation to the logic of the Community pillar. Although less pronounced, the same slow shift of perspective can be said to be taking place in the realm of the second pillar or Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP). That is arguably why the governments of the Member States were ready to scrap the intergovernmental label, currently attached to both pillars, in the Constitutional Treaty. The necessary political will appears to be there for the CFSP, the main focus of this article, to move into the next phase: one which will necessarily entail less intergovernmentalism and ‘more’ community method — with judicial oversight as one of its central elements. It is therefore necessary to ask ourselves about the specific role the European Court of Justice should be given. It is with this question in mind that we should approach the changes envisaged by the Constitutional Treaty (hereinafter CT). Even if this document is politically dead, it is the measure of how far the Member States were willing to go in changing the nature of the second pillar and its judicial control. It is foreseeable that a more or less obvious process of cherry-picking will take place in the future; the Member States and institutions, unable to see the CT ratified, will understandably seek to otherwise implement or bring about some of its reforms, if at all possible: those which allegedly deserve to be cherry-picked.This article will consider the role that the ECJ was given within Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) in the Constitution, to decide whether it is good enough to be cherry-picked in the future. Is this the solution we want, or should we set out to find different, more suitable arrangements if the jurisdiction of the ECJ in matters of CFSP is to be reformed in the future? With this in mind, I will examine the changes in the nature of the measures adopted under the CSFP envisaged by the CT (from intergovernmental to Union measures). Consequently, I will turn to the very restricted judicial control foreseen in this area. The jurisdiction of the ECJ is still excluded, save for some exceptions. This article will consider the scope of these exceptions to determine how far-reaching they are, and thus what kind of part they allow the ECJ to play." @default.
• W2005748209 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2005748209 creator A5007493437 @default.
• W2005748209 date "2006-01-01" @default.
• W2005748209 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2005748209 title "Judicial Control of CFSP in the Constitution: A Cherry Worth Picking?" @default.
• W2005748209 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
• W2005748209 type Work @default.
• W2005748209 sameAs 2005748209 @default.
• W2005748209 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2005748209 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W2005748209 hasAuthorship W2005748209A5007493437 @default.
• W2005748209 hasConcept C155202549 @default.
• W2005748209 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2005748209 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2005748209 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
• W2005748209 hasConcept C190974861 @default.
• W2005748209 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2005748209 hasConcept C2776154427 @default.
• W2005748209 hasConcept C2776824162 @default.
• W2005748209 hasConcept C2779010840 @default.
• W2005748209 hasConcept C2910001868 @default.
• W2005748209 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W2005748209 hasConceptScore W2005748209C155202549 @default.
• W2005748209 hasConceptScore W2005748209C162324750 @default.
• W2005748209 hasConceptScore W2005748209C17744445 @default.
• W2005748209 hasConceptScore W2005748209C190253527 @default.
• W2005748209 hasConceptScore W2005748209C190974861 @default.
• W2005748209 hasConceptScore W2005748209C199539241 @default.
• W2005748209 hasConceptScore W2005748209C2776154427 @default.
• W2005748209 hasConceptScore W2005748209C2776824162 @default.
• W2005748209 hasConceptScore W2005748209C2779010840 @default.
• W2005748209 hasConceptScore W2005748209C2910001868 @default.
• W2005748209 hasConceptScore W2005748209C94625758 @default.
• W2005748209 hasOpenAccess W2005748209 @default.
• W2005748209 hasRelatedWork W136547926 @default.
• W2005748209 hasRelatedWork W1537410473 @default.
• W2005748209 hasRelatedWork W1556048736 @default.
• W2005748209 hasRelatedWork W1767359944 @default.
• W2005748209 hasRelatedWork W1802694940 @default.
• W2005748209 hasRelatedWork W1818945637 @default.
• W2005748209 hasRelatedWork W1976396642 @default.
• W2005748209 hasRelatedWork W2042716163 @default.
• W2005748209 hasRelatedWork W2096036029 @default.
• W2005748209 hasRelatedWork W2293713170 @default.
• W2005748209 hasRelatedWork W2338249490 @default.
• W2005748209 hasRelatedWork W2340341208 @default.
• W2005748209 hasRelatedWork W2434360431 @default.
• W2005748209 hasRelatedWork W2594210759 @default.
• W2005748209 hasRelatedWork W2807879775 @default.
• W2005748209 hasRelatedWork W2889537877 @default.
• W2005748209 hasRelatedWork W3124756885 @default.
• W2005748209 hasRelatedWork W3141170072 @default.
• W2005748209 hasRelatedWork W1792428842 @default.
• W2005748209 hasRelatedWork W2140503848 @default.
• W2005748209 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2005748209 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2005748209 magId "2005748209" @default.
• W2005748209 workType "article" @default.