FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2005892736> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2005892736 endingPage "423" @default.
• W2005892736 startingPage "407" @default.
• W2005892736 abstract "Russell, Frege, and the Meaning of the Theory of Descriptions (or): Did Russell Know His Frege? R. K. PERKINS, JR. EARLY IN Principia Mathematica where Bertrand Russell sets forth his famous theory of descriptions, one encounters a curious argument that occurs in the context of Russell's contention that definite descriptions are incomplete symbols and that purports to show that 'the author of Waverley' means nothing . As Russell gives it: The author of Waverley cannot mean the same as Scott, or Scott is the author of Waverley would mean the same as Scott is Scott, which it plainly does not; nor can the author of Waverley mean anything other than Scott, or Scott is the author of Waverley would be false. Hence the author of Waverley means nothing.' Some philosophers---my former self included--have dismissed the argument as exhibiting an elementary fallacy of equivocation on mean as between sense (in the first line) and reference (in the third line). '~Of course, the charge that Russell was generally guilty of confusing the idea of meaning as sense with the idea of meaning as reference has been made by a number of contemporary philosophers. Thus W. V. Quine has written, for want of A modified version of this paper was read before the Bertrand Russell Society at the meeting of the eastern division of the American Philosophical Association in 1976. 1 Alfred North Whitehead and Bertrand Russell, PrincipiaMathematicato *56 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1962), p. 67. L. Linsky, Referring(London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1967), pp. 53, 88; A. R. White The 'Meaning' of Russell's Theory of Descriptions, Analysis 19, no. 6 (1959): 8-9; R. Jager, The DevelopmentofBertrandRussell'sPhilosophy(London: Allen & Unwin, 1972), p. 245. [4o71 408 HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY distinctions Russell tended to blur meaninglessness with failure of reference .... To make sense is to have a meaning, and the meaning is the reference. ''~ Similarly, P. F. Strawson, in his well-known attack on the theory of descriptions, has claimed that the source of Russell's mistake was that be thought that referring .... if it occurred at all, must be meaning, and so he confused meaning with referring. TMAnd to this list of accusers one could add the names of Ludwig Wittgenstein, Gilbert Ryle, A.J. Ayer, and John Searle. 5 Now, this is a puzzling state of affairs because not only is it prima facie hard to believe that a logician of Russell's caliber could have confused such semantically distinct dimensions as sense and reference; it is also prima facie difficult to believe that such a mistake could have been made by one who was something of a Frege scholar at the time he produced his theory of descriptions (19o5). 6 So the question that naturally arises is, What bearing, if any, does Frege's distinction between sense and reference have on Russell's theory of descriptions, and to what extent was Russell aware of this? I want to show in what ways Russell's theory of descriptions does accomodate Frege's distinction and in what ways it does not. Specifically, I shall argue in section ~ that Russell does not confuse sense and reference and that be does embrace a sense-refer6nce distinction, although not Frege's, since Frege's was not up to doing the job that Russell wanted done in 10o5. In section 3 I shall return to consider Russell's curious Principia argument and defend it against some charges of equivocation. First, however, by way of background, I would like to sketch the essentials of Russell's theory and what be took to be the main problem it was designed to overcome. I The main problem that provided the motivation for the theory of descriptions was the old puzzle of how we are able to talk about things that do not exist. 7 The problem is as old as Parmenides' poem On Nature, in which he is 3 Russell's Ontological Development, in Bertrand Russell: Philosopherof the Century, ed. R. Schoenman (London: Allen & Unwin, 1967), p. 31o. 4 On Referring, Mind 59 095o): 328. 5 See L. Wittgenstein, PhilosophicalInvestigations, 2nd ed. (Oxford: BasilBlackwell,1958),p. 4o; G. Ryle, Meaning and Necessity,Philosophy24 0949): '7~ and The..." @default.
• W2005892736 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2005892736 creator A5046839688 @default.
• W2005892736 date "1982-01-01" @default.
• W2005892736 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2005892736 title "Russell, Frege, and the Meaning of the Theory of Descriptions (or): Did Russell Know His Frege?" @default.
• W2005892736 cites W1500853111 @default.
• W2005892736 cites W1501401251 @default.
• W2005892736 cites W1507265854 @default.
• W2005892736 cites W1576032878 @default.
• W2005892736 cites W1582383306 @default.
• W2005892736 cites W1965462762 @default.
• W2005892736 cites W1971713389 @default.
• W2005892736 cites W1988044039 @default.
• W2005892736 cites W1994016808 @default.
• W2005892736 cites W2008720751 @default.
• W2005892736 cites W2025705313 @default.
• W2005892736 cites W2035260372 @default.
• W2005892736 cites W2045571856 @default.
• W2005892736 cites W2046512412 @default.
• W2005892736 cites W2064445530 @default.
• W2005892736 cites W2072395631 @default.
• W2005892736 cites W2106131771 @default.
• W2005892736 cites W2127081270 @default.
• W2005892736 cites W2246288490 @default.
• W2005892736 cites W2281388164 @default.
• W2005892736 cites W2312205736 @default.
• W2005892736 cites W2313961278 @default.
• W2005892736 cites W2316363783 @default.
• W2005892736 cites W2322865677 @default.
• W2005892736 cites W2325714485 @default.
• W2005892736 cites W2326039171 @default.
• W2005892736 cites W2332703092 @default.
• W2005892736 cites W2335107681 @default.
• W2005892736 cites W2484889341 @default.
• W2005892736 cites W2543556095 @default.
• W2005892736 cites W2798598542 @default.
• W2005892736 cites W2977904728 @default.
• W2005892736 cites W3128891208 @default.
• W2005892736 cites W621429121 @default.
• W2005892736 cites W834950340 @default.
• W2005892736 cites W8715909 @default.
• W2005892736 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.1982.0044" @default.
• W2005892736 hasPublicationYear "1982" @default.
• W2005892736 type Work @default.
• W2005892736 sameAs 2005892736 @default.
• W2005892736 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W2005892736 countsByYear W20058927362022 @default.
• W2005892736 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2005892736 hasAuthorship W2005892736A5046839688 @default.
• W2005892736 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2005892736 hasConcept C136815107 @default.
• W2005892736 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2005892736 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W2005892736 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2005892736 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W2005892736 hasConcept C2780876879 @default.
• W2005892736 hasConcept C2781035248 @default.
• W2005892736 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W2005892736 hasConcept C9270016 @default.
• W2005892736 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W2005892736 hasConcept C98184364 @default.
• W2005892736 hasConceptScore W2005892736C111472728 @default.
• W2005892736 hasConceptScore W2005892736C136815107 @default.
• W2005892736 hasConceptScore W2005892736C138885662 @default.
• W2005892736 hasConceptScore W2005892736C166957645 @default.
• W2005892736 hasConceptScore W2005892736C185592680 @default.
• W2005892736 hasConceptScore W2005892736C2779343474 @default.
• W2005892736 hasConceptScore W2005892736C2780876879 @default.
• W2005892736 hasConceptScore W2005892736C2781035248 @default.
• W2005892736 hasConceptScore W2005892736C55493867 @default.
• W2005892736 hasConceptScore W2005892736C9270016 @default.
• W2005892736 hasConceptScore W2005892736C95457728 @default.
• W2005892736 hasConceptScore W2005892736C98184364 @default.
• W2005892736 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2005892736 hasLocation W20058927361 @default.
• W2005892736 hasOpenAccess W2005892736 @default.
• W2005892736 hasPrimaryLocation W20058927361 @default.
• W2005892736 hasRelatedWork W1766364848 @default.
• W2005892736 hasRelatedWork W2017985195 @default.
• W2005892736 hasRelatedWork W2101828061 @default.
• W2005892736 hasRelatedWork W2157502692 @default.
• W2005892736 hasRelatedWork W2167531849 @default.
• W2005892736 hasRelatedWork W2311825824 @default.
• W2005892736 hasRelatedWork W2514608820 @default.
• W2005892736 hasRelatedWork W2794161207 @default.
• W2005892736 hasRelatedWork W2810983536 @default.
• W2005892736 hasRelatedWork W3209062011 @default.
• W2005892736 hasVolume "20" @default.
• W2005892736 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2005892736 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2005892736 magId "2005892736" @default.
• W2005892736 workType "article" @default.