FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2005962067> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2005962067 endingPage "1090" @default.
• W2005962067 startingPage "1082" @default.
• W2005962067 abstract "Background Integrated positron emission tomography (PET)–computed tomography (CT) may have advantages over conventional imaging in localizing recurrent or persistent differentiated thyroid cancer. Methods A retrospective review of patients who underwent PET-CT scans was performed. Results were compared with contrast CT, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonography, and radioactive iodine (RAI) scans. Results Thirty patients (mean age, 49.9 ± 17 years) underwent 36 PET-CT scans, mostly for elevated thyroglobulin levels and negative RAI scans (30 scans). Fifty percent (18/36) of PET-CT scans showed increased uptake in the neck, 11 of 36 (31%) in the chest, 3 of 36 (8.3%) in bone, and 6 of 36 (16.6%) in other areas. PET-CT had overall sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values of 73.9%, 61.5%, and 77.3% respectively. To assess the added value of PET-CT, we focused on the 21 scans performed after conventional imaging in 20 patients. PET-CT provided additional information in 2 (10%) patients, both of whom were spared interventions. However, PET-CT underestimated extent of disease in 3 (15%) patients and led to unnecessary interventions in 3 (15%) additional patients. Conclusion PET-CT has reasonable sensitivity in the detection of recurrent thyroid cancer. However, the added value of PET-CT may be seen only in a limited number of patients after good quality, conventional imaging. Further studies are needed to determine the most cost-effective approach to managing these patients. Integrated positron emission tomography (PET)–computed tomography (CT) may have advantages over conventional imaging in localizing recurrent or persistent differentiated thyroid cancer. A retrospective review of patients who underwent PET-CT scans was performed. Results were compared with contrast CT, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonography, and radioactive iodine (RAI) scans. Thirty patients (mean age, 49.9 ± 17 years) underwent 36 PET-CT scans, mostly for elevated thyroglobulin levels and negative RAI scans (30 scans). Fifty percent (18/36) of PET-CT scans showed increased uptake in the neck, 11 of 36 (31%) in the chest, 3 of 36 (8.3%) in bone, and 6 of 36 (16.6%) in other areas. PET-CT had overall sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive values of 73.9%, 61.5%, and 77.3% respectively. To assess the added value of PET-CT, we focused on the 21 scans performed after conventional imaging in 20 patients. PET-CT provided additional information in 2 (10%) patients, both of whom were spared interventions. However, PET-CT underestimated extent of disease in 3 (15%) patients and led to unnecessary interventions in 3 (15%) additional patients. PET-CT has reasonable sensitivity in the detection of recurrent thyroid cancer. However, the added value of PET-CT may be seen only in a limited number of patients after good quality, conventional imaging. Further studies are needed to determine the most cost-effective approach to managing these patients." @default.
• W2005962067 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2005962067 creator A5001656263 @default.
• W2005962067 creator A5039341909 @default.
• W2005962067 creator A5052483047 @default.
• W2005962067 creator A5057722452 @default.
• W2005962067 creator A5066450002 @default.
• W2005962067 creator A5067011553 @default.
• W2005962067 date "2010-12-01" @default.
• W2005962067 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2005962067 title "PET-CT scans in recurrent or persistent differentiated thyroid cancer: Is there added utility beyond conventional imaging?" @default.
• W2005962067 cites W1768064139 @default.
• W2005962067 cites W1978764493 @default.
• W2005962067 cites W1988714038 @default.
• W2005962067 cites W1999600489 @default.
• W2005962067 cites W1999630730 @default.
• W2005962067 cites W2002281731 @default.
• W2005962067 cites W2008056193 @default.
• W2005962067 cites W2012343712 @default.
• W2005962067 cites W2017074946 @default.
• W2005962067 cites W2019014309 @default.
• W2005962067 cites W2021222357 @default.
• W2005962067 cites W2039462004 @default.
• W2005962067 cites W2047884718 @default.
• W2005962067 cites W2047898309 @default.
• W2005962067 cites W2092240825 @default.
• W2005962067 cites W2097812157 @default.
• W2005962067 cites W2108244168 @default.
• W2005962067 cites W2116236456 @default.
• W2005962067 cites W2116319807 @default.
• W2005962067 cites W2116542352 @default.
• W2005962067 cites W2614771967 @default.
• W2005962067 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2010.09.015" @default.
• W2005962067 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21134537" @default.
• W2005962067 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W2005962067 type Work @default.
• W2005962067 sameAs 2005962067 @default.
• W2005962067 citedByCount "12" @default.
• W2005962067 countsByYear W20059620672012 @default.
• W2005962067 countsByYear W20059620672013 @default.
• W2005962067 countsByYear W20059620672015 @default.
• W2005962067 countsByYear W20059620672016 @default.
• W2005962067 countsByYear W20059620672017 @default.
• W2005962067 countsByYear W20059620672020 @default.
• W2005962067 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2005962067 hasAuthorship W2005962067A5001656263 @default.
• W2005962067 hasAuthorship W2005962067A5039341909 @default.
• W2005962067 hasAuthorship W2005962067A5052483047 @default.
• W2005962067 hasAuthorship W2005962067A5057722452 @default.
• W2005962067 hasAuthorship W2005962067A5066450002 @default.
• W2005962067 hasAuthorship W2005962067A5067011553 @default.
• W2005962067 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2005962067 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2005962067 hasConcept C127077266 @default.
• W2005962067 hasConcept C143409427 @default.
• W2005962067 hasConcept C163716698 @default.
• W2005962067 hasConcept C2775842073 @default.
• W2005962067 hasConcept C2779761222 @default.
• W2005962067 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W2005962067 hasConcept C526584372 @default.
• W2005962067 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2005962067 hasConceptScore W2005962067C126322002 @default.
• W2005962067 hasConceptScore W2005962067C126838900 @default.
• W2005962067 hasConceptScore W2005962067C127077266 @default.
• W2005962067 hasConceptScore W2005962067C143409427 @default.
• W2005962067 hasConceptScore W2005962067C163716698 @default.
• W2005962067 hasConceptScore W2005962067C2775842073 @default.
• W2005962067 hasConceptScore W2005962067C2779761222 @default.
• W2005962067 hasConceptScore W2005962067C2989005 @default.
• W2005962067 hasConceptScore W2005962067C526584372 @default.
• W2005962067 hasConceptScore W2005962067C71924100 @default.
• W2005962067 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W2005962067 hasLocation W20059620671 @default.
• W2005962067 hasLocation W20059620672 @default.
• W2005962067 hasOpenAccess W2005962067 @default.
• W2005962067 hasPrimaryLocation W20059620671 @default.
• W2005962067 hasRelatedWork W2021569957 @default.
• W2005962067 hasRelatedWork W2035166136 @default.
• W2005962067 hasRelatedWork W2070705913 @default.
• W2005962067 hasRelatedWork W2150829460 @default.
• W2005962067 hasRelatedWork W2750891463 @default.
• W2005962067 hasRelatedWork W2766004981 @default.
• W2005962067 hasRelatedWork W2909852936 @default.
• W2005962067 hasRelatedWork W2913624518 @default.
• W2005962067 hasRelatedWork W2951337402 @default.
• W2005962067 hasRelatedWork W4235976919 @default.
• W2005962067 hasVolume "148" @default.
• W2005962067 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2005962067 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2005962067 magId "2005962067" @default.
• W2005962067 workType "article" @default.