FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2006069338> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2006069338 endingPage "42" @default.
• W2006069338 startingPage "24" @default.
• W2006069338 abstract "Introduction: Theorizing Technology as Practice and Process Technology is more than just objects. Technology is, as Ursula Franklin suggests in her germinal work, The Real World of Technology, also a set of social practices and processes that define communities and groups through ways of doing something.1 Terms such as knowledge economy and information worker define a group of immensely diverse occupations and industries by their shared way of doing something, namely, working with information technologies (IT). Though these terms are used primarily as labels that delineate highly valued groups, they also often conceal, rather than reveal, the nature of such work. Is a data entry worker, for example, an information worker in the same way as a software designer, because they both use a computer to process information? The definitions of such occupational groups can also lead to particular assumptions of value about the work. We tend not to ask what is actually known in our knowledge economy, or for that matter, whether knowing is better than understanding. The use of the word knowledge is peculiar in this case, as the ultimate goal of many technological systems is to eliminate human error and presumed user stupidity. Other types of occupations not viewed as knowledge occupations, such as trades occupations, can be comparatively rich in knowledge, expertise, and critical tidbits of data. Given that in the context of scientific rationalism, certain marginalized groups of people, including women, have not been viewed as knowers and have been excluded from particular kinds of knowledge communities, such terms can hide the social relations of power and privilege that shape technological processes. All forms of work have been affected by technology. Technological developments have changed what is seen as normal, possible, and desirable. Although all forms of work have been changed by technology, they tend to retain the [End Page 24] structure that was present before the technology was introduced. For example, despite the introduction of a wide variety of household technologies, women still do the bulk of unpaid domestic labor in the home.2 While indeed it takes longer to learn to use a cyclotron than to use a vacuum cleaner, the fact remains that while technology has in some way altered all forms of work, it has tended not to change the social relations upon which work is premised. Knowledge work or, more accurately, work within a field that is broadly labeled information technology (IT), has often been portrayed since the advent of the computer network as a fundamentally new form of work. While IT work has now become routine and, indeed, with the downturn of the so-called dotcom industry, something of a symbol of industrial hubris, there is nevertheless a pervasive cultural sense that despite such glitches of banality and imminent economic deflation the inevitable progress will nevertheless occur. Industry publications are rife with panting hyperbole about the power of technology to change the world, even as they lament job losses to offshore programmers. Despite the IT industry's claim to novelty, considerable evidence exists that IT highlights ongoing tensions in the general organization of the labor market and evokes concerns around labor that have been familiar since the Industrial Revolution. Despite new language and new tasks, technological work reflects and reproduces fundamental social, economic, and political trends. In terms of the technology itself, social relations largely determine its conception, development, implementation, and process.3 Technological Labor and Gender Early work on technology and gender tended to homogenize both these elements. Certain assumptions were embedded in discussions of gender and technology. For example, gender usually meant women (and only a certain imagined group of women who stood for the collective whole of women), and technology meant computers and not, say, blenders or tampon applicators. Technological theories such as those of Sadie Plant took up the notion of digital as a metaphor for emergent..." @default.
• W2006069338 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2006069338 creator A5029900229 @default.
• W2006069338 date "2005-01-01" @default.
• W2006069338 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2006069338 title "From Digital Binary to Analog Continuum: Measuring Gendered IT Labor: Notes toward Multidimensional Methodologies" @default.
• W2006069338 cites W129667016 @default.
• W2006069338 cites W1495253673 @default.
• W2006069338 cites W1518849694 @default.
• W2006069338 cites W1522302028 @default.
• W2006069338 cites W1538179167 @default.
• W2006069338 cites W1546144271 @default.
• W2006069338 cites W1564172092 @default.
• W2006069338 cites W1569641405 @default.
• W2006069338 cites W1749733 @default.
• W2006069338 cites W1991579695 @default.
• W2006069338 cites W1998153863 @default.
• W2006069338 cites W2002535182 @default.
• W2006069338 cites W2013913499 @default.
• W2006069338 cites W2014322679 @default.
• W2006069338 cites W2016938270 @default.
• W2006069338 cites W2038397677 @default.
• W2006069338 cites W2048761774 @default.
• W2006069338 cites W2066313831 @default.
• W2006069338 cites W2073528977 @default.
• W2006069338 cites W2075930105 @default.
• W2006069338 cites W2079477989 @default.
• W2006069338 cites W2101361255 @default.
• W2006069338 cites W2105623709 @default.
• W2006069338 cites W2114168618 @default.
• W2006069338 cites W2115885880 @default.
• W2006069338 cites W2170454073 @default.
• W2006069338 cites W2182356775 @default.
• W2006069338 cites W223305185 @default.
• W2006069338 cites W2278127151 @default.
• W2006069338 cites W2327521297 @default.
• W2006069338 cites W2336305838 @default.
• W2006069338 cites W2497692545 @default.
• W2006069338 cites W3125968450 @default.
• W2006069338 cites W384142327 @default.
• W2006069338 cites W578840601 @default.
• W2006069338 cites W598780950 @default.
• W2006069338 cites W614112210 @default.
• W2006069338 cites W2152291997 @default.
• W2006069338 cites W2189495191 @default.
• W2006069338 cites W606645772 @default.
• W2006069338 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/fro.2005.0003" @default.
• W2006069338 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
• W2006069338 type Work @default.
• W2006069338 sameAs 2006069338 @default.
• W2006069338 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W2006069338 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2006069338 hasAuthorship W2006069338A5029900229 @default.
• W2006069338 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2006069338 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W2006069338 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
• W2006069338 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2006069338 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2006069338 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2006069338 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W2006069338 hasConcept C177264268 @default.
• W2006069338 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W2006069338 hasConcept C2776291640 @default.
• W2006069338 hasConcept C2776961235 @default.
• W2006069338 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W2006069338 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2006069338 hasConcept C56739046 @default.
• W2006069338 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2006069338 hasConcept C98045186 @default.
• W2006069338 hasConceptScore W2006069338C111472728 @default.
• W2006069338 hasConceptScore W2006069338C111919701 @default.
• W2006069338 hasConceptScore W2006069338C119857082 @default.
• W2006069338 hasConceptScore W2006069338C138885662 @default.
• W2006069338 hasConceptScore W2006069338C144024400 @default.
• W2006069338 hasConceptScore W2006069338C151730666 @default.
• W2006069338 hasConceptScore W2006069338C154945302 @default.
• W2006069338 hasConceptScore W2006069338C177264268 @default.
• W2006069338 hasConceptScore W2006069338C199360897 @default.
• W2006069338 hasConceptScore W2006069338C2776291640 @default.
• W2006069338 hasConceptScore W2006069338C2776961235 @default.
• W2006069338 hasConceptScore W2006069338C2779343474 @default.
• W2006069338 hasConceptScore W2006069338C41008148 @default.
• W2006069338 hasConceptScore W2006069338C56739046 @default.
• W2006069338 hasConceptScore W2006069338C86803240 @default.
• W2006069338 hasConceptScore W2006069338C98045186 @default.
• W2006069338 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2006069338 hasLocation W20060693381 @default.
• W2006069338 hasOpenAccess W2006069338 @default.
• W2006069338 hasPrimaryLocation W20060693381 @default.
• W2006069338 hasRelatedWork W1480922982 @default.
• W2006069338 hasRelatedWork W196405095 @default.
• W2006069338 hasRelatedWork W2084145347 @default.
• W2006069338 hasRelatedWork W2153798176 @default.
• W2006069338 hasRelatedWork W2224427030 @default.
• W2006069338 hasRelatedWork W2355215981 @default.
• W2006069338 hasRelatedWork W2370652759 @default.
• W2006069338 hasRelatedWork W2376345092 @default.
• W2006069338 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.

• next