FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2006331284> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2006331284 endingPage "780" @default.
• W2006331284 startingPage "773" @default.
• W2006331284 abstract "Background: The optimal method for treating intra-articular fractures of the calcaneus remains controversial. Extensile approaches allow excellent fracture exposure, but high rates of wound complications are seen. Newer minimally invasive techniques for calcaneus fracture fixation offer a potentially lower wound complication rate, but long-term clinical results are not available. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of intra-articular calcaneus fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation via an extensile approach versus those with a minimally invasive sinus tarsi approach. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of all intra-articular calcaneal fractures treated operatively between October 2005 and December 2008. A total of 112 fractures were found that met our inclusion criteria; 79 were treated with an extensile lateral approach and 33 via a minimally invasive approach based on surgeon preference. Chart and radiographic results were thoroughly reviewed on all 112 fractures, specifically for wound healing complications and the need for further surgeries within the study period. Additionally, all patients were contacted and asked to return for a research visit that included radiography, clinical examination, and quality of life questionnaires (Short Form 36 [SF-36], foot function index [FFI], visual analog scale [VAS] pain). A total of 47 of 112 (42%) patients returned for a research visit (31 extensile, 16 minimally invasive). Results: The 2 groups were comparable with regard to demographics (age, follow-up, male to female ratio, tobacco use, diabetes, workers’ compensation status). In the extensile group, 53% of fractures were Sanders II and 47% were Sanders III, whereas in the minimally invasive group 61% were Sanders II and 39% were Sanders III. The overall wound complication rate was 29% in the extensile group (9% required operative intervention) versus 6% in the minimally invasive group ( P = .005) (none required operative intervention). Overall, 20% of the extensile group required a secondary surgery within the study period versus 2% in the minimally invasive group ( P = .007). In the group of patients who returned for research visits, the average FFI total score was 31 in the extensile group versus 22 in the minimally invasive group ( P = .21). The average VAS pain score with activity was 36 in the extensile group versus 31 in the minimally invasive group ( P = .48). Overall, 84% of patients in the extensile group were satisfied with their result versus 94% in the minimally invasive group ( P = .32). Both groups had 100% union rates, and no differences were noted in the final postoperative Bohler’s angle and angle of Gissane. Conclusion: Clinical results were similar between calcaneal fractures treated with an extensile approach and those treated with a minimally invasive approach. However, the minimally invasive approach had a significantly lower incidence of wound complications and secondary surgeries. The minimally invasive approach was a valuable method for the treatment of intra-articular calcaneal fractures, with low complication rates and results comparable to those treated with an extensile approach. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative case series." @default.
• W2006331284 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2006331284 creator A5009264034 @default.
• W2006331284 creator A5025122577 @default.
• W2006331284 creator A5035890590 @default.
• W2006331284 creator A5061536008 @default.
• W2006331284 creator A5076349610 @default.
• W2006331284 date "2013-03-04" @default.
• W2006331284 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2006331284 title "Minimally Invasive Technique Versus an Extensile Lateral Approach for Intra-Articular Calcaneal Fractures" @default.
• W2006331284 cites W1593088465 @default.
• W2006331284 cites W1850360388 @default.
• W2006331284 cites W1857785383 @default.
• W2006331284 cites W1927382738 @default.
• W2006331284 cites W1973606583 @default.
• W2006331284 cites W2012661236 @default.
• W2006331284 cites W2015125176 @default.
• W2006331284 cites W2027930433 @default.
• W2006331284 cites W2030129572 @default.
• W2006331284 cites W2030808809 @default.
• W2006331284 cites W2038911740 @default.
• W2006331284 cites W2042612110 @default.
• W2006331284 cites W2043251700 @default.
• W2006331284 cites W2057142924 @default.
• W2006331284 cites W2062451313 @default.
• W2006331284 cites W2066890393 @default.
• W2006331284 cites W2074405820 @default.
• W2006331284 cites W2085474974 @default.
• W2006331284 cites W2101529330 @default.
• W2006331284 cites W2102261421 @default.
• W2006331284 cites W2120566006 @default.
• W2006331284 cites W2135088122 @default.
• W2006331284 cites W2140396581 @default.
• W2006331284 cites W2159699335 @default.
• W2006331284 cites W2333950089 @default.
• W2006331284 cites W2408782304 @default.
• W2006331284 doi "https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100713477607" @default.
• W2006331284 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23460669" @default.
• W2006331284 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2006331284 type Work @default.
• W2006331284 sameAs 2006331284 @default.
• W2006331284 citedByCount "165" @default.
• W2006331284 countsByYear W20063312842013 @default.
• W2006331284 countsByYear W20063312842014 @default.
• W2006331284 countsByYear W20063312842015 @default.
• W2006331284 countsByYear W20063312842016 @default.
• W2006331284 countsByYear W20063312842017 @default.
• W2006331284 countsByYear W20063312842018 @default.
• W2006331284 countsByYear W20063312842019 @default.
• W2006331284 countsByYear W20063312842020 @default.
• W2006331284 countsByYear W20063312842021 @default.
• W2006331284 countsByYear W20063312842022 @default.
• W2006331284 countsByYear W20063312842023 @default.
• W2006331284 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2006331284 hasAuthorship W2006331284A5009264034 @default.
• W2006331284 hasAuthorship W2006331284A5025122577 @default.
• W2006331284 hasAuthorship W2006331284A5035890590 @default.
• W2006331284 hasAuthorship W2006331284A5061536008 @default.
• W2006331284 hasAuthorship W2006331284A5076349610 @default.
• W2006331284 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2006331284 hasConcept C14184104 @default.
• W2006331284 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W2006331284 hasConcept C2776889875 @default.
• W2006331284 hasConcept C2780075673 @default.
• W2006331284 hasConcept C2780660378 @default.
• W2006331284 hasConcept C36454342 @default.
• W2006331284 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2006331284 hasConceptScore W2006331284C141071460 @default.
• W2006331284 hasConceptScore W2006331284C14184104 @default.
• W2006331284 hasConceptScore W2006331284C167135981 @default.
• W2006331284 hasConceptScore W2006331284C2776889875 @default.
• W2006331284 hasConceptScore W2006331284C2780075673 @default.
• W2006331284 hasConceptScore W2006331284C2780660378 @default.
• W2006331284 hasConceptScore W2006331284C36454342 @default.
• W2006331284 hasConceptScore W2006331284C71924100 @default.
• W2006331284 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W2006331284 hasLocation W20063312841 @default.
• W2006331284 hasLocation W20063312842 @default.
• W2006331284 hasOpenAccess W2006331284 @default.
• W2006331284 hasPrimaryLocation W20063312841 @default.
• W2006331284 hasRelatedWork W2022154883 @default.
• W2006331284 hasRelatedWork W2048989757 @default.
• W2006331284 hasRelatedWork W2358451641 @default.
• W2006331284 hasRelatedWork W2367328649 @default.
• W2006331284 hasRelatedWork W2367872734 @default.
• W2006331284 hasRelatedWork W2381321942 @default.
• W2006331284 hasRelatedWork W2516451065 @default.
• W2006331284 hasRelatedWork W2754911496 @default.
• W2006331284 hasRelatedWork W3048457109 @default.
• W2006331284 hasRelatedWork W3157840933 @default.
• W2006331284 hasVolume "34" @default.
• W2006331284 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2006331284 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2006331284 magId "2006331284" @default.
• W2006331284 workType "article" @default.