FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2006392360> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2006392360 endingPage "582" @default.
• W2006392360 startingPage "561" @default.
• W2006392360 abstract "Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and ManagementVol. 02, No. 04, pp. 561-582 (2000) No AccessPUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN EIA: A STUDY FROM A PORTUGUESE PERSPECTIVECONSTANÇA VASCONCELOS, ANDY HAMILTON, and PETER BARRETTCONSTANÇA VASCONCELOSResearch Centre for the Built and Human Environment, Salford University, Bridgewater Building, Salford, Manchester, M7 9NU, UK Search for more papers by this author , ANDY HAMILTONResearch Centre for the Built and Human Environment, Salford University, Bridgewater Building, Salford, Manchester, M7 9NU, UKAll correspondence to Andy Hamilton or Constança Vasconcelos. Search for more papers by this author , and PETER BARRETTResearch Centre for the Built and Human Environment, Salford University, Bridgewater Building, Salford, Manchester, M7 9NU, UK Search for more papers by this author https://doi.org/10.1142/S146433320000045XCited by:3 PreviousNext AboutSectionsPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsRecommend to Library ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail AbstractThis paper focuses on Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) since it was the first and is the most universal instrument requiring public participation in environmental management. After considering the origins of EIA and its relationship to the inherent problems in environment and sustainability, we put it in the context of The Portuguese Case. Portugal's involvement in the European environmental debate only began after the 1974 revolution. After 40 years of repressive dictatorship, the Portuguese society is characterised by a lack of traditions in civil society, the centralisation of the state, clientelism and bureaucracy. We examine the legal framework for EIA in Portugal and its interaction with various levels of government. Within this context the results of our research work are discussed. The interviews carried out with stakeholders in the Portuguese EIA process show that public participation occurs too late in the process and that the methods of consultation are generally considered inadequate. A growing demand by the public for better systems of consultation is noted. An analysis of the current state of Portuguese EIA is given and, based on this analysis, suggestions for improving the process are made. A brief assessment is made of new legislation (decree law 69/2000) concerning EIA.Keywords:participationenvironmentassessmentPortuguese FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited By 3Benchmarking na avaliação de impacto ambiental: o sistema mineiro frente às melhores práticas internacionaisMaria Rita Raimundo e Almeida and Marcelo Montaño1 Apr 2015 | Sociedade & Natureza, Vol. 27, No. 1Evaluation of the environmental impact assessment system in EgyptEl-Sayed A. Badr1 Sep 2009 | Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, Vol. 27, No. 3PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN THE CHINESE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA) SYSTEMSHANSHAN YANG30 April 2012 | Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, Vol. 10, No. 01 Recommended Vol. 02, No. 04 Metrics History KeywordsparticipationenvironmentassessmentPortuguesePDF download" @default.
• W2006392360 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2006392360 creator A5083314754 @default.
• W2006392360 date "2000-12-01" @default.
• W2006392360 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2006392360 title "Public Participation in EIA A Study from a Portuguese Perspective" @default.
• W2006392360 cites W1486260510 @default.
• W2006392360 cites W1495891784 @default.
• W2006392360 cites W1574713378 @default.
• W2006392360 cites W1985428137 @default.
• W2006392360 cites W1990223166 @default.
• W2006392360 cites W1998480168 @default.
• W2006392360 cites W2092425493 @default.
• W2006392360 cites W2100885023 @default.
• W2006392360 cites W2108231714 @default.
• W2006392360 cites W2130438405 @default.
• W2006392360 cites W2138657002 @default.
• W2006392360 cites W2752850252 @default.
• W2006392360 cites W49479346 @default.
• W2006392360 cites W777549501 @default.
• W2006392360 cites W83182721 @default.
• W2006392360 cites W1978311462 @default.
• W2006392360 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s1464-3332(00)00045-x" @default.
• W2006392360 hasPublicationYear "2000" @default.
• W2006392360 type Work @default.
• W2006392360 sameAs 2006392360 @default.
• W2006392360 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W2006392360 countsByYear W20063923602013 @default.
• W2006392360 countsByYear W20063923602015 @default.
• W2006392360 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2006392360 hasAuthorship W2006392360A5083314754 @default.
• W2006392360 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2006392360 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2006392360 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2006392360 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W2006392360 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2006392360 hasConcept C187736073 @default.
• W2006392360 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W2006392360 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2006392360 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W2006392360 hasConcept C2778786385 @default.
• W2006392360 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W2006392360 hasConcept C3116431 @default.
• W2006392360 hasConcept C35219183 @default.
• W2006392360 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2006392360 hasConcept C48327123 @default.
• W2006392360 hasConcept C51575053 @default.
• W2006392360 hasConcept C555826173 @default.
• W2006392360 hasConcept C66204764 @default.
• W2006392360 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2006392360 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W2006392360 hasConceptScore W2006392360C138885662 @default.
• W2006392360 hasConceptScore W2006392360C144024400 @default.
• W2006392360 hasConceptScore W2006392360C162324750 @default.
• W2006392360 hasConceptScore W2006392360C166957645 @default.
• W2006392360 hasConceptScore W2006392360C17744445 @default.
• W2006392360 hasConceptScore W2006392360C187736073 @default.
• W2006392360 hasConceptScore W2006392360C18903297 @default.
• W2006392360 hasConceptScore W2006392360C199539241 @default.
• W2006392360 hasConceptScore W2006392360C205649164 @default.
• W2006392360 hasConceptScore W2006392360C2778786385 @default.
• W2006392360 hasConceptScore W2006392360C2779343474 @default.
• W2006392360 hasConceptScore W2006392360C3116431 @default.
• W2006392360 hasConceptScore W2006392360C35219183 @default.
• W2006392360 hasConceptScore W2006392360C41895202 @default.
• W2006392360 hasConceptScore W2006392360C48327123 @default.
• W2006392360 hasConceptScore W2006392360C51575053 @default.
• W2006392360 hasConceptScore W2006392360C555826173 @default.
• W2006392360 hasConceptScore W2006392360C66204764 @default.
• W2006392360 hasConceptScore W2006392360C86803240 @default.
• W2006392360 hasConceptScore W2006392360C94625758 @default.
• W2006392360 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2006392360 hasLocation W20063923601 @default.
• W2006392360 hasOpenAccess W2006392360 @default.
• W2006392360 hasPrimaryLocation W20063923601 @default.
• W2006392360 hasRelatedWork W1992609303 @default.
• W2006392360 hasRelatedWork W2000571582 @default.
• W2006392360 hasRelatedWork W2006392360 @default.
• W2006392360 hasRelatedWork W2049867576 @default.
• W2006392360 hasRelatedWork W2087988231 @default.
• W2006392360 hasRelatedWork W2276664398 @default.
• W2006392360 hasRelatedWork W2319987881 @default.
• W2006392360 hasRelatedWork W2890293553 @default.
• W2006392360 hasRelatedWork W4245026794 @default.
• W2006392360 hasRelatedWork W4321225832 @default.
• W2006392360 hasVolume "2" @default.
• W2006392360 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2006392360 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2006392360 magId "2006392360" @default.
• W2006392360 workType "article" @default.