FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2006402564> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2006402564 endingPage "489" @default.
• W2006402564 startingPage "485" @default.
• W2006402564 abstract "Although sentinel lymph node biopsy is likely to be offered as a method of assessing nodal status in primary breast cancer, the inability to identify the sentinel node at the time of surgery will limit the number of patients who may benefit from the procedure. The purpose of the present study was to identify factors that are associated with intraoperative identification of the sentinel node(s).Between September 1995 and May 1999, lymphatic mapping using a combination of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and/or blue dye was performed on 169 consecutive patients with clinically lymph node-negative primary operable breast cancer. Clinical and histological factors were assessed using univariate and multivariate analysis to determine those that were associated with intraoperative identification of the sentinel node.The sentinel node was identified at the time of surgery in 142 cases (84%). Of the clinical factors assessed, preoperative identification of the sentinel node on lymphoscintigraphy (P < 0.0001), use of blue dye in combination with isotope (P = 0.001), symptomatic palpable tumours (P < 0.05) and the experience of the surgeon (P = 0.03) were significant in identifying the sentinel node at operation. No histological factor was associated with intraoperative identification of the sentinel node. Using multivariate analysis, positive identification of the sentinel node on lymphoscintigram, the experience of the surgeon and the use of both blue dye and isotope for sentinel node mapping were independent factors associated with intraoperative sentinel node identification. The lymphoscintigram result was the strongest independent factor according to its beta value, a measure of the weight of significance.Patients undergoing sentinel lymph node mapping and biopsy should be warned of the possibility of failure of sentinel node identification at operation. Our results suggest that the best predictor of intraoperative sentinel node identification is the visualization of the sentinel node on preoperative lymphoscintigraphy. The result of the lymhoscintigram may allow for additional preoperative counselling of the patient regarding the success or failure of sentinel node biopsy. Technical factors such as the experience and diligence of the surgeon, as well as the sentinel node mapping technique, are also important in determining the success of the procedure." @default.
• W2006402564 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2006402564 creator A5018808500 @default.
• W2006402564 creator A5029273558 @default.
• W2006402564 creator A5056708868 @default.
• W2006402564 creator A5066297253 @default.
• W2006402564 creator A5083614643 @default.
• W2006402564 creator A5085894676 @default.
• W2006402564 date "2000-07-07" @default.
• W2006402564 modified "2023-10-06" @default.
• W2006402564 title "CLINICAL AND HISTOLOGICAL FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH SENTINEL NODE IDENTIFICATION IN BREAST CANCER" @default.
• W2006402564 cites W1558643593 @default.
• W2006402564 cites W1955110002 @default.
• W2006402564 cites W1963906874 @default.
• W2006402564 cites W1986657548 @default.
• W2006402564 cites W2001575298 @default.
• W2006402564 cites W2010871781 @default.
• W2006402564 cites W2020321814 @default.
• W2006402564 cites W2034761115 @default.
• W2006402564 cites W2035931877 @default.
• W2006402564 cites W2036977094 @default.
• W2006402564 cites W2039110392 @default.
• W2006402564 cites W2085614484 @default.
• W2006402564 cites W2093552508 @default.
• W2006402564 cites W2113732180 @default.
• W2006402564 cites W2128678633 @default.
• W2006402564 cites W2135673390 @default.
• W2006402564 cites W2159886167 @default.
• W2006402564 cites W2165484640 @default.
• W2006402564 cites W2335018892 @default.
• W2006402564 cites W2413960362 @default.
• W2006402564 cites W4248739241 @default.
• W2006402564 cites W1986839937 @default.
• W2006402564 doi "https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1622.2000.01861.x" @default.
• W2006402564 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10901574" @default.
• W2006402564 hasPublicationYear "2000" @default.
• W2006402564 type Work @default.
• W2006402564 sameAs 2006402564 @default.
• W2006402564 citedByCount "26" @default.
• W2006402564 countsByYear W20064025642012 @default.
• W2006402564 countsByYear W20064025642013 @default.
• W2006402564 countsByYear W20064025642014 @default.
• W2006402564 countsByYear W20064025642016 @default.
• W2006402564 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2006402564 hasAuthorship W2006402564A5018808500 @default.
• W2006402564 hasAuthorship W2006402564A5029273558 @default.
• W2006402564 hasAuthorship W2006402564A5056708868 @default.
• W2006402564 hasAuthorship W2006402564A5066297253 @default.
• W2006402564 hasAuthorship W2006402564A5083614643 @default.
• W2006402564 hasAuthorship W2006402564A5085894676 @default.
• W2006402564 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2006402564 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2006402564 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2006402564 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2006402564 hasConcept C143998085 @default.
• W2006402564 hasConcept C179671157 @default.
• W2006402564 hasConcept C2775934546 @default.
• W2006402564 hasConcept C2780212769 @default.
• W2006402564 hasConcept C2780849966 @default.
• W2006402564 hasConcept C38180746 @default.
• W2006402564 hasConcept C530470458 @default.
• W2006402564 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2006402564 hasConceptScore W2006402564C121608353 @default.
• W2006402564 hasConceptScore W2006402564C126322002 @default.
• W2006402564 hasConceptScore W2006402564C126838900 @default.
• W2006402564 hasConceptScore W2006402564C141071460 @default.
• W2006402564 hasConceptScore W2006402564C143998085 @default.
• W2006402564 hasConceptScore W2006402564C179671157 @default.
• W2006402564 hasConceptScore W2006402564C2775934546 @default.
• W2006402564 hasConceptScore W2006402564C2780212769 @default.
• W2006402564 hasConceptScore W2006402564C2780849966 @default.
• W2006402564 hasConceptScore W2006402564C38180746 @default.
• W2006402564 hasConceptScore W2006402564C530470458 @default.
• W2006402564 hasConceptScore W2006402564C71924100 @default.
• W2006402564 hasIssue "7" @default.
• W2006402564 hasLocation W20064025641 @default.
• W2006402564 hasLocation W20064025642 @default.
• W2006402564 hasOpenAccess W2006402564 @default.
• W2006402564 hasPrimaryLocation W20064025641 @default.
• W2006402564 hasRelatedWork W1969547515 @default.
• W2006402564 hasRelatedWork W1991626733 @default.
• W2006402564 hasRelatedWork W2016032979 @default.
• W2006402564 hasRelatedWork W2060369328 @default.
• W2006402564 hasRelatedWork W2078227717 @default.
• W2006402564 hasRelatedWork W2096570443 @default.
• W2006402564 hasRelatedWork W2137013672 @default.
• W2006402564 hasRelatedWork W2298673130 @default.
• W2006402564 hasRelatedWork W2886656652 @default.
• W2006402564 hasRelatedWork W3031850188 @default.
• W2006402564 hasVolume "70" @default.
• W2006402564 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2006402564 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2006402564 magId "2006402564" @default.
• W2006402564 workType "article" @default.