FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2006734505> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2006734505 abstract "Recent years have witnessed community disaster resilience becoming one of the most heavily supported and advocated approach to disaster risk management. However, its application has been influenced by the lack of assessment tools. This study reviews studies conducted using the resilience concept and examines the tools, models, and methods adopted. It examines the domains, indicators, and indices have been considered in the tools. It provides a critical analysis of the assessment tools available for evaluating community disaster resilience (CDR).We investigated international electronic databases including Scopus, MEDLINE through PubMed, ISI Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health (CINAHL), and Google Scholar with no limitation on date, and type of articles. The search terms and strategy were as follow: (Disaster* OR Emergenc*) AND (Resilience OR Resilient OR Resiliency) that were applied for titles, abstracts and keywords. Extracted data were analyzed in terms of studied hazards, types of methodology, domains, and indicators of CDR assessment.Of 675 publications initially identified, the final analysis was conducted on 17 full text articles. These studies presented ten models, tools, or indices for CDR assessment. These evinced a diverse set of models with regard to the domains, indicators and the kind of hazard described. Considerable inter dependency between and among domains and indicators also emerged from this analysis.The disparity between the articles using the resilience concept and those that offer some approach to measurement (675 vs. 17) indicates the conceptual and measurement complexity in CDR and the fact that the concept may be being used without regard to how CDR should be operationalized and assessed. Of those that have attempted to assess CDR, the level of conceptual diversity indicates limited agreement about how to operationalize the concept. As a way forward we summarize the models identified in the literature and suggest that, as a starting point for the systematic operationalization of CDR, that existing indicators of community disaster resilience be classified in five domains. These are social, economic, institutional, physical and natural domains. A need to use appropriate and effective methods to quantify and weigh them with regard to their relative contributions to resilience is identified, as is a need to consider how these levels interrelate to influence resilience. Although assessment of disaster resilience especially at the community level will inform disaster risk reduction strategies, attempts to systematically do so are in preliminary phases. Further empirical investigation is needed to develop a operational and measurable CDR model." @default.
• W2006734505 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2006734505 creator A5015206441 @default.
• W2006734505 creator A5024060304 @default.
• W2006734505 creator A5026319553 @default.
• W2006734505 creator A5046465102 @default.
• W2006734505 creator A5049105683 @default.
• W2006734505 date "2015-01-01" @default.
• W2006734505 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2006734505 title "Community Disaster Resilience: a Systematic Review on Assessment Models and Tools" @default.
• W2006734505 cites W1546175941 @default.
• W2006734505 cites W1964251643 @default.
• W2006734505 cites W1967719662 @default.
• W2006734505 cites W2006893111 @default.
• W2006734505 cites W2045372751 @default.
• W2006734505 cites W2051112237 @default.
• W2006734505 cites W2056371964 @default.
• W2006734505 cites W2074746092 @default.
• W2006734505 cites W2076817544 @default.
• W2006734505 cites W2163961779 @default.
• W2006734505 cites W2165865654 @default.
• W2006734505 cites W2206938461 @default.
• W2006734505 cites W2101500010 @default.
• W2006734505 doi "https://doi.org/10.1371/currents.dis.f224ef8efbdfcf1d508dd0de4d8210ed" @default.
• W2006734505 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/4395373" @default.
• W2006734505 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25905026" @default.
• W2006734505 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2006734505 type Work @default.
• W2006734505 sameAs 2006734505 @default.
• W2006734505 citedByCount "102" @default.
• W2006734505 countsByYear W20067345052015 @default.
• W2006734505 countsByYear W20067345052016 @default.
• W2006734505 countsByYear W20067345052017 @default.
• W2006734505 countsByYear W20067345052018 @default.
• W2006734505 countsByYear W20067345052019 @default.
• W2006734505 countsByYear W20067345052020 @default.
• W2006734505 countsByYear W20067345052021 @default.
• W2006734505 countsByYear W20067345052022 @default.
• W2006734505 countsByYear W20067345052023 @default.
• W2006734505 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2006734505 hasAuthorship W2006734505A5015206441 @default.
• W2006734505 hasAuthorship W2006734505A5024060304 @default.
• W2006734505 hasAuthorship W2006734505A5026319553 @default.
• W2006734505 hasAuthorship W2006734505A5046465102 @default.
• W2006734505 hasAuthorship W2006734505A5049105683 @default.
• W2006734505 hasBestOaLocation W20067345051 @default.
• W2006734505 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W2006734505 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2006734505 hasConcept C152124472 @default.
• W2006734505 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2006734505 hasConcept C178790620 @default.
• W2006734505 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2006734505 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2006734505 hasConcept C2522767166 @default.
• W2006734505 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W2006734505 hasConcept C2779488668 @default.
• W2006734505 hasConcept C2779585090 @default.
• W2006734505 hasConcept C2781145037 @default.
• W2006734505 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2006734505 hasConcept C49261128 @default.
• W2006734505 hasConcept C83867959 @default.
• W2006734505 hasConcept C97355855 @default.
• W2006734505 hasConceptScore W2006734505C111919701 @default.
• W2006734505 hasConceptScore W2006734505C121332964 @default.
• W2006734505 hasConceptScore W2006734505C152124472 @default.
• W2006734505 hasConceptScore W2006734505C17744445 @default.
• W2006734505 hasConceptScore W2006734505C178790620 @default.
• W2006734505 hasConceptScore W2006734505C185592680 @default.
• W2006734505 hasConceptScore W2006734505C199539241 @default.
• W2006734505 hasConceptScore W2006734505C2522767166 @default.
• W2006734505 hasConceptScore W2006734505C2779473830 @default.
• W2006734505 hasConceptScore W2006734505C2779488668 @default.
• W2006734505 hasConceptScore W2006734505C2779585090 @default.
• W2006734505 hasConceptScore W2006734505C2781145037 @default.
• W2006734505 hasConceptScore W2006734505C41008148 @default.
• W2006734505 hasConceptScore W2006734505C49261128 @default.
• W2006734505 hasConceptScore W2006734505C83867959 @default.
• W2006734505 hasConceptScore W2006734505C97355855 @default.
• W2006734505 hasLocation W20067345051 @default.
• W2006734505 hasLocation W20067345052 @default.
• W2006734505 hasLocation W20067345053 @default.
• W2006734505 hasLocation W20067345054 @default.
• W2006734505 hasOpenAccess W2006734505 @default.
• W2006734505 hasPrimaryLocation W20067345051 @default.
• W2006734505 hasRelatedWork W2040891508 @default.
• W2006734505 hasRelatedWork W2793526594 @default.
• W2006734505 hasRelatedWork W3020194755 @default.
• W2006734505 hasRelatedWork W3112832253 @default.
• W2006734505 hasRelatedWork W3155458441 @default.
• W2006734505 hasRelatedWork W3170371879 @default.
• W2006734505 hasRelatedWork W3196725752 @default.
• W2006734505 hasRelatedWork W4206832741 @default.
• W2006734505 hasRelatedWork W4244285984 @default.
• W2006734505 hasRelatedWork W4384207120 @default.
• W2006734505 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2006734505 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2006734505 magId "2006734505" @default.
• W2006734505 workType "article" @default.