FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2006996629> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2006996629 endingPage "184" @default.
• W2006996629 startingPage "159" @default.
• W2006996629 abstract "Dreams of Death in Medieval Castilian Hagiography: Martyrdom and Ideology in the Gran Flos Sanctorum Andrew M. Beresford Critical discourses dealing with the explosion of oneiric and visionary activity in the Middle Ages have offered crucial insights into questions of symbolism and representation, the systems of theory and classification that inform and underpin the development of individual narratives, and the relevance of visions and dreams to broader psychological, sociological, and theological discussions. A salient element of these discourses, however, is that, almost without exception, they have tended to deal with texts, whether verbal or pictorial, in terms of the primacy of the oneiric or the visionary within the global structure or intellectual fabric of the narrative. The pioneering work of Constance B. Hieatt and A. C. Spearing, for instance, focuses on the dream as a meta-framework, and engages with texts in which oneiric experience functions as the essential unifying device. Later contributions, such as those of Kathryn L. Lynch, Steven F. Kruger, and Isabel Moreira, have provided [End Page 159] more detailed and nuanced readings, while Barbara Newman’s timely survey has offered a series of salutary insights into the relationship between theory and methodology, particularly from an interdisciplinary perspective. Comparably informative approaches have been adopted in discussions of early Castilian production, and of particular note are the studies of Harriet Goldberg, Julian Palley, Jacques Joset, and Teresa Gómez Trueba, whose focus is predominantly literary, and that of Victor I. Stoichita, which offers an engaging assessment of the impact of the visual tradition. This work has been constructive in formulating approaches to individual texts, and has led more broadly to an informed appreciation of the chronological and intellectual shaping of dream-vision conventions per se. However, it has been less beneficial in providing a mechanism for appraising the content of the vast body of texts that are only partially conditioned by oneiric or visionary activity, or where the functional significance of dream visions is reduced to that of a convenient narrative device. The question in part is one of the perceived reality encoded into texts of different generic types. In fully developed dream visions the rules of construction depart from those of normative reality: objects speak; abstractions are given life; the logic of the physical universe becomes subservient to the demands of allegory. The inconceivable becomes possible, and the indescribable, all but routine. Readers of body-and-soul debates, for instance, instantly accept that a purulent corpse can talk and that a soul can assume the form of a dove or a small child. In Razón de amor and the Vida de Santa Oria we are confronted by talking goblets in a pomegranate tree and celestial ladders in the sky. In fully developed dream frameworks we embrace such codes without hesitation and seldom query the broader fundamentals of construction. Only the most esoteric suggestions, such as those traced by Alan Deyermond in the enigmatic and contradictory text of the Libro de Buen Amor, initiate a search for elusive contextualizing parameters. It is understandable that the main thrust of critical discourse should have been in this area: the departure from reality establishes a sense of wonder and awe that merits detailed inspection. Yet the corollary is that the clash between vision and normative reality in texts that deal predominantly with [End Page 160] the latter has been all but ignored. Momentary intrusions that rupture, but do not permanently alter, the temporal fabric of medieval Castilian narratives have seldom been accounted for or discussed systematically. The result, inevitably, has been an element of distortion, as the focus of criticism has fallen on the most visually evocative examples of oneiric and visionary experience rather than its broader aetiology. Specific forms such as the tripartite journey (where the dreamer is transported from a situation of waking reality to a complex symbolic locus of meaning followed by a moralizing conclusion) have been discussed at the expense of texts which are less imaginatively constituted, particularly in their use of imagery and symbolism. In hagiography, attention has been lavished on journeys to the otherworld in works devoted largely to them, but seldom to elements of the otherworld intruding into the quotidian life of the..." @default.
• W2006996629 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2006996629 creator A5074008003 @default.
• W2006996629 date "2013-01-01" @default.
• W2006996629 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2006996629 title "Dreams of Death in Medieval Castilian Hagiography: Martyrdom and Ideology in the Gran Flos Sanctorum" @default.
• W2006996629 cites W1581213257 @default.
• W2006996629 cites W1967280731 @default.
• W2006996629 cites W1981287235 @default.
• W2006996629 cites W1983203605 @default.
• W2006996629 cites W2011506799 @default.
• W2006996629 cites W2012506916 @default.
• W2006996629 cites W2027850616 @default.
• W2006996629 cites W2035960151 @default.
• W2006996629 cites W2087821904 @default.
• W2006996629 cites W2097732318 @default.
• W2006996629 cites W2139418482 @default.
• W2006996629 cites W2154865708 @default.
• W2006996629 cites W2161098141 @default.
• W2006996629 cites W2230758942 @default.
• W2006996629 cites W2320592638 @default.
• W2006996629 cites W2321139862 @default.
• W2006996629 cites W2605557118 @default.
• W2006996629 cites W2760796121 @default.
• W2006996629 cites W2970459636 @default.
• W2006996629 cites W2971187277 @default.
• W2006996629 cites W312691161 @default.
• W2006996629 cites W3182593119 @default.
• W2006996629 cites W3185035078 @default.
• W2006996629 cites W54517307 @default.
• W2006996629 cites W566239995 @default.
• W2006996629 cites W568935295 @default.
• W2006996629 cites W573961414 @default.
• W2006996629 cites W578481050 @default.
• W2006996629 cites W597988370 @default.
• W2006996629 cites W600275102 @default.
• W2006996629 cites W634518947 @default.
• W2006996629 cites W643856468 @default.
• W2006996629 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/cor.2013.0031" @default.
• W2006996629 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2006996629 type Work @default.
• W2006996629 sameAs 2006996629 @default.
• W2006996629 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2006996629 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2006996629 hasAuthorship W2006996629A5074008003 @default.
• W2006996629 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
• W2006996629 hasConcept C133979268 @default.
• W2006996629 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2006996629 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W2006996629 hasConcept C143128703 @default.
• W2006996629 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2006996629 hasConcept C15708023 @default.
• W2006996629 hasConcept C158071213 @default.
• W2006996629 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W2006996629 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2006996629 hasConcept C19165224 @default.
• W2006996629 hasConcept C199033989 @default.
• W2006996629 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2006996629 hasConcept C2776359362 @default.
• W2006996629 hasConcept C510816226 @default.
• W2006996629 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W2006996629 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W2006996629 hasConceptScore W2006996629C124952713 @default.
• W2006996629 hasConceptScore W2006996629C133979268 @default.
• W2006996629 hasConceptScore W2006996629C138885662 @default.
• W2006996629 hasConceptScore W2006996629C142362112 @default.
• W2006996629 hasConceptScore W2006996629C143128703 @default.
• W2006996629 hasConceptScore W2006996629C144024400 @default.
• W2006996629 hasConceptScore W2006996629C15708023 @default.
• W2006996629 hasConceptScore W2006996629C158071213 @default.
• W2006996629 hasConceptScore W2006996629C166957645 @default.
• W2006996629 hasConceptScore W2006996629C17744445 @default.
• W2006996629 hasConceptScore W2006996629C19165224 @default.
• W2006996629 hasConceptScore W2006996629C199033989 @default.
• W2006996629 hasConceptScore W2006996629C199539241 @default.
• W2006996629 hasConceptScore W2006996629C2776359362 @default.
• W2006996629 hasConceptScore W2006996629C510816226 @default.
• W2006996629 hasConceptScore W2006996629C94625758 @default.
• W2006996629 hasConceptScore W2006996629C95457728 @default.
• W2006996629 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2006996629 hasLocation W20069966291 @default.
• W2006996629 hasOpenAccess W2006996629 @default.
• W2006996629 hasPrimaryLocation W20069966291 @default.
• W2006996629 hasRelatedWork W136924775 @default.
• W2006996629 hasRelatedWork W2006996629 @default.
• W2006996629 hasRelatedWork W2326033517 @default.
• W2006996629 hasRelatedWork W2368894555 @default.
• W2006996629 hasRelatedWork W2393480057 @default.
• W2006996629 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2006996629 hasRelatedWork W2770480739 @default.
• W2006996629 hasRelatedWork W2933608806 @default.
• W2006996629 hasRelatedWork W2999842649 @default.
• W2006996629 hasRelatedWork W4251869248 @default.
• W2006996629 hasVolume "42" @default.
• W2006996629 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2006996629 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2006996629 magId "2006996629" @default.
• W2006996629 workType "article" @default.