FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2007040976> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2007040976 endingPage "303" @default.
• W2007040976 startingPage "295" @default.
• W2007040976 abstract "********** After what level of alcohol consumption does an informant become unreliable? How do I distinguish between an emphatic opinion, delivered under the candor-producing influence of alcohol, and unrestrained hyperbole, wrought by intoxication? When should I stop taking notes? (And I'm sure some of you are wondering, At what point is the alcohol-consuming interviewer no longer reliable? On that, more later....) Why should I have voiced questions about alcohol and fieldwork? I wasn't plying my interviewees with bottles of vodka--they were alarmingly capable of doing that on their own. My problem was that I was doing fieldwork on conflicts over natural resources in rural Russia. Vodka is so much a part of daily life there that few--almost no--gathering takes place without shared libation (Figure 1). Additionally, I was asking people to discuss with me controversial matters, such as poaching or resistance to the establishment of a park, that could, on occasion, elicit immoderate responses. We hunt all of the time. They call me the Killer! When I go out hunting with my friends I always come home with pheasants and fowl. I shoot everything, even deer. We are all poachers here! No, my friends and I don't hunt anymore. There isn't that much left to hunt around here, some geese, ducks but not many deer. And it's the simple guys like me who are the ones who get fined if we're caught, so we just don't hunt. The quotations are from the same young man, and the seemingly irreconcilable statements were produced under very different levels of alcohol consumption. The first expression, full of a hunter's braggadocio, came as he was drinking. Its successor was issued in the cold light of day, and when he was stone sober. So, does he hunt all the time, or does he no longer hunt? (Maybe the answer is that he hunts some of the time.) Between an intoxicated boast and an unintoxicated wariness about admitting to illegal acts, how does a researcher know which statement more accurately reflects the actual behavior of an informant? Most researchers who look at hunting around a protected area will probably have had similar experiences. It's only natural that one doesn't admit to poaching. Of course, hunting isn't the only topic that elicits such contradictory statements. BACKGROUND Muraviovka Nature Park became, in 1992, the first private nature reserve in Russia since before the Soviet period. This 5,200-hectare wetland reserve, created through a cooperative effort of Russian, American, and Japanese organizations, protects nesting habitats for several endangered species of birds, including the red-crowned crane, the white-naped crane, and the oriental white stork. Muraviovka Nature Park was carved out of a larger, state-run wildlife refuge that lacked the resources to adequately protect breeding grounds for these birds. The land for the park was leased from the local, district-level government by a Russian nongovernmental organization (NGO) with moneys put up by a Japanese corporation. Additional funds from U.S. NGOS supported building construction, vehicle acquisition, and educational programs. The district government generally welcomed this moneymaking opportunity, but many officials in the provincial and village-level governments were strongly opposed to the establishment of an independent and private park. Some were against it for ideological reasons; others, for economic ones. Although the park was created within a refuge where hunting was already restricted, neighbors were afraid of losing all hunting rights. The hunting administration that managed the refuge was vehemently opposed to ceding control of any part of its territory to another organization. Some say that communist ideologues in the hunting administration were opposed to nonstate control over the land. Others suggest that the hunting administration was operating its own highly profitable, but quite illegal, hunting tours for local bigwigs in areas closed to hunting. …" @default.
• W2007040976 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2007040976 creator A5048719766 @default.
• W2007040976 date "2001-01-04" @default.
• W2007040976 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W2007040976 title "WHICH TRUTH? CULTURAL POLITICS AND VODKA IN RURAL RUSSIA*" @default.
• W2007040976 cites W1963980507 @default.
• W2007040976 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1931-0846.2001.tb00483.x" @default.
• W2007040976 hasPublicationYear "2001" @default.
• W2007040976 type Work @default.
• W2007040976 sameAs 2007040976 @default.
• W2007040976 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W2007040976 countsByYear W20070409762013 @default.
• W2007040976 countsByYear W20070409762019 @default.
• W2007040976 countsByYear W20070409762022 @default.
• W2007040976 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2007040976 hasAuthorship W2007040976A5048719766 @default.
• W2007040976 hasConcept C13646594 @default.
• W2007040976 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2007040976 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2007040976 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
• W2007040976 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2007040976 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W2007040976 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2007040976 hasConcept C2776217272 @default.
• W2007040976 hasConcept C2778311575 @default.
• W2007040976 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2007040976 hasConcept C29595303 @default.
• W2007040976 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2007040976 hasConcept C57473165 @default.
• W2007040976 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2007040976 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W2007040976 hasConceptScore W2007040976C13646594 @default.
• W2007040976 hasConceptScore W2007040976C138885662 @default.
• W2007040976 hasConceptScore W2007040976C144024400 @default.
• W2007040976 hasConceptScore W2007040976C149923435 @default.
• W2007040976 hasConceptScore W2007040976C17744445 @default.
• W2007040976 hasConceptScore W2007040976C18903297 @default.
• W2007040976 hasConceptScore W2007040976C199539241 @default.
• W2007040976 hasConceptScore W2007040976C2776217272 @default.
• W2007040976 hasConceptScore W2007040976C2778311575 @default.
• W2007040976 hasConceptScore W2007040976C2908647359 @default.
• W2007040976 hasConceptScore W2007040976C29595303 @default.
• W2007040976 hasConceptScore W2007040976C41895202 @default.
• W2007040976 hasConceptScore W2007040976C57473165 @default.
• W2007040976 hasConceptScore W2007040976C86803240 @default.
• W2007040976 hasConceptScore W2007040976C94625758 @default.
• W2007040976 hasLocation W20070409761 @default.
• W2007040976 hasOpenAccess W2007040976 @default.
• W2007040976 hasPrimaryLocation W20070409761 @default.
• W2007040976 hasRelatedWork W1858532259 @default.
• W2007040976 hasRelatedWork W1977317256 @default.
• W2007040976 hasRelatedWork W2004450615 @default.
• W2007040976 hasRelatedWork W2211490876 @default.
• W2007040976 hasRelatedWork W2257674859 @default.
• W2007040976 hasRelatedWork W231856566 @default.
• W2007040976 hasRelatedWork W2326149938 @default.
• W2007040976 hasRelatedWork W2329682533 @default.
• W2007040976 hasRelatedWork W234665003 @default.
• W2007040976 hasRelatedWork W2471438725 @default.
• W2007040976 hasRelatedWork W2589283324 @default.
• W2007040976 hasRelatedWork W2599143345 @default.
• W2007040976 hasRelatedWork W270803401 @default.
• W2007040976 hasRelatedWork W2989482633 @default.
• W2007040976 hasRelatedWork W2992379959 @default.
• W2007040976 hasRelatedWork W3196926675 @default.
• W2007040976 hasRelatedWork W343169009 @default.
• W2007040976 hasRelatedWork W598081407 @default.
• W2007040976 hasRelatedWork W72385060 @default.
• W2007040976 hasRelatedWork W2596422916 @default.
• W2007040976 hasVolume "91" @default.
• W2007040976 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2007040976 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2007040976 magId "2007040976" @default.
• W2007040976 workType "article" @default.