FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2007145189> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2007145189 endingPage "1817" @default.
• W2007145189 startingPage "1812" @default.
• W2007145189 abstract "ObjectiveTo survey the preferences and variations in the current use of first- and second-generation endometrial ablative techniques for menorrhagia among the consultant gynecologists in the United Kingdom, given the call for further studies to systematically compare the clinical effectiveness of the various endometrial ablation techniques.DesignPostal questionnaire survey.PopulationOne thousand, four hundred sixty consultant gynecologists in the United Kingdom.Main Outcome Measure(s)Preferred endometrial ablation/resection method and variations in the current practices.Result(s)Six hundred ten (41%) consultants responded. Of these, 449 (73%) performed endometrial ablation/resection. Thermal balloon ablation (32.1%) was the preferred method, followed by microwave endometrial ablation (29.8%), transcervical resection of the endometrial alone or combined with roller ball diathermy (18.5%), Novasure (9.8%), hydrotherm ablation (6.9%), roller ball (2%), and laser (0.9%). Patient response to treatment was assessed using clinical history (64.3%), menstrual calendar (7.6%), clinical history and menstrual calendar (21.3%), questionnaires (5.8%), and pictorial blood loss assessment charts (0.4%). A total of 52.2% used gonadotrophin releasing hormone analogues preoperatively. Variations in techniques for transcervical resection of the endometrial included methods used to treat the uterine fundus and cornuae, fluid management, and operating pressures.Conclusion(s)Second-generation endometrial ablation devices were preferred to first-generation devices for the management of menorrhagia. Thermal balloon ablation was the most preferred method. However, variations in surgical practices will make assessment of clinical efficacy a challenge. To survey the preferences and variations in the current use of first- and second-generation endometrial ablative techniques for menorrhagia among the consultant gynecologists in the United Kingdom, given the call for further studies to systematically compare the clinical effectiveness of the various endometrial ablation techniques. Postal questionnaire survey. One thousand, four hundred sixty consultant gynecologists in the United Kingdom. Preferred endometrial ablation/resection method and variations in the current practices. Six hundred ten (41%) consultants responded. Of these, 449 (73%) performed endometrial ablation/resection. Thermal balloon ablation (32.1%) was the preferred method, followed by microwave endometrial ablation (29.8%), transcervical resection of the endometrial alone or combined with roller ball diathermy (18.5%), Novasure (9.8%), hydrotherm ablation (6.9%), roller ball (2%), and laser (0.9%). Patient response to treatment was assessed using clinical history (64.3%), menstrual calendar (7.6%), clinical history and menstrual calendar (21.3%), questionnaires (5.8%), and pictorial blood loss assessment charts (0.4%). A total of 52.2% used gonadotrophin releasing hormone analogues preoperatively. Variations in techniques for transcervical resection of the endometrial included methods used to treat the uterine fundus and cornuae, fluid management, and operating pressures. Second-generation endometrial ablation devices were preferred to first-generation devices for the management of menorrhagia. Thermal balloon ablation was the most preferred method. However, variations in surgical practices will make assessment of clinical efficacy a challenge." @default.
• W2007145189 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2007145189 creator A5026456143 @default.
• W2007145189 creator A5043238593 @default.
• W2007145189 creator A5047944945 @default.
• W2007145189 date "2008-11-01" @default.
• W2007145189 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
• W2007145189 title "A survey of preferences and practices of endometrial ablation/resection for menorrhagia in the United Kingdom" @default.
• W2007145189 cites W1508330148 @default.
• W2007145189 cites W1970100797 @default.
• W2007145189 cites W1970163571 @default.
• W2007145189 cites W1995832517 @default.
• W2007145189 cites W1995900288 @default.
• W2007145189 cites W2009812677 @default.
• W2007145189 cites W2023261682 @default.
• W2007145189 cites W2041039604 @default.
• W2007145189 cites W2047607150 @default.
• W2007145189 cites W2051579331 @default.
• W2007145189 cites W2052940746 @default.
• W2007145189 cites W2063339314 @default.
• W2007145189 cites W2069268554 @default.
• W2007145189 cites W2080519455 @default.
• W2007145189 cites W2096696663 @default.
• W2007145189 cites W2108148837 @default.
• W2007145189 cites W2125070112 @default.
• W2007145189 cites W2150074023 @default.
• W2007145189 cites W2152185043 @default.
• W2007145189 cites W2158081907 @default.
• W2007145189 cites W96678012 @default.
• W2007145189 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.08.052" @default.
• W2007145189 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18083167" @default.
• W2007145189 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W2007145189 type Work @default.
• W2007145189 sameAs 2007145189 @default.
• W2007145189 citedByCount "15" @default.
• W2007145189 countsByYear W20071451892012 @default.
• W2007145189 countsByYear W20071451892013 @default.
• W2007145189 countsByYear W20071451892015 @default.
• W2007145189 countsByYear W20071451892016 @default.
• W2007145189 countsByYear W20071451892022 @default.
• W2007145189 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2007145189 hasAuthorship W2007145189A5026456143 @default.
• W2007145189 hasAuthorship W2007145189A5043238593 @default.
• W2007145189 hasAuthorship W2007145189A5047944945 @default.
• W2007145189 hasBestOaLocation W20071451891 @default.
• W2007145189 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2007145189 hasConcept C131872663 @default.
• W2007145189 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2007145189 hasConcept C2778902805 @default.
• W2007145189 hasConcept C2778937548 @default.
• W2007145189 hasConcept C2779494336 @default.
• W2007145189 hasConcept C2779742232 @default.
• W2007145189 hasConcept C2781131426 @default.
• W2007145189 hasConcept C29456083 @default.
• W2007145189 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2007145189 hasConceptScore W2007145189C126322002 @default.
• W2007145189 hasConceptScore W2007145189C131872663 @default.
• W2007145189 hasConceptScore W2007145189C141071460 @default.
• W2007145189 hasConceptScore W2007145189C2778902805 @default.
• W2007145189 hasConceptScore W2007145189C2778937548 @default.
• W2007145189 hasConceptScore W2007145189C2779494336 @default.
• W2007145189 hasConceptScore W2007145189C2779742232 @default.
• W2007145189 hasConceptScore W2007145189C2781131426 @default.
• W2007145189 hasConceptScore W2007145189C29456083 @default.
• W2007145189 hasConceptScore W2007145189C71924100 @default.
• W2007145189 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W2007145189 hasLocation W20071451891 @default.
• W2007145189 hasLocation W20071451892 @default.
• W2007145189 hasOpenAccess W2007145189 @default.
• W2007145189 hasPrimaryLocation W20071451891 @default.
• W2007145189 hasRelatedWork W116481501 @default.
• W2007145189 hasRelatedWork W184539412 @default.
• W2007145189 hasRelatedWork W197185963 @default.
• W2007145189 hasRelatedWork W2047349811 @default.
• W2007145189 hasRelatedWork W2063990873 @default.
• W2007145189 hasRelatedWork W2097912527 @default.
• W2007145189 hasRelatedWork W2152071675 @default.
• W2007145189 hasRelatedWork W2225680293 @default.
• W2007145189 hasRelatedWork W2939617907 @default.
• W2007145189 hasRelatedWork W4247296267 @default.
• W2007145189 hasVolume "90" @default.
• W2007145189 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2007145189 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2007145189 magId "2007145189" @default.
• W2007145189 workType "article" @default.