FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2007152413> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2007152413 endingPage "21333" @default.
• W2007152413 startingPage "21327" @default.
• W2007152413 abstract "Previous electron microscopic studies of bacterial RCLH1 complexes demonstrated both circular and elliptical conformations of the LH1 ring, and this implied flexibility has been suggested to allow passage of quinol from the QB site of the RC to the quinone pool prior to reduction of the cytochrome bc1 complex. We have used atomic force microscopy to demonstrate that these are just two of many conformations for the LH1 ring, which displays large molecule-to-molecule variations, in terms of both shape and size. This atomic force microscope study has used a mutant lacking the reaction center complex, which normally sits within the LH1 ring providing a barrier to substantial changes in shape. This approach has revealed the inherent flexibility and lack of structural coherence of this complex in a reconstituted lipid bilayer at room temperature. Circular, elliptical, and even polygonal ring shapes as well as arcs and open rings have been observed for LH1; in contrast, no such variations in structure were observed for the LH2 complex under the same conditions. The basis for these differences between LH1 and LH2 is suggested to be the H-bonding patterns that stabilize binding of the bacteriochlorophylls to the LH polypeptides. The existence of open rings and arcs provides a direct visualization of the consequences of the relatively weak associations that govern the aggregation of the protomers (α1β1Bchl2) comprising the LH1 complex. The demonstration that the linkage between adjacent protomer units is flexible and can even be uncoupled at room temperature in a detergent-free membrane bilayer provides a rationale for the dynamic separation of individual protomers, and we may now envisage experiments that seek to prove this active opening process. Previous electron microscopic studies of bacterial RCLH1 complexes demonstrated both circular and elliptical conformations of the LH1 ring, and this implied flexibility has been suggested to allow passage of quinol from the QB site of the RC to the quinone pool prior to reduction of the cytochrome bc1 complex. We have used atomic force microscopy to demonstrate that these are just two of many conformations for the LH1 ring, which displays large molecule-to-molecule variations, in terms of both shape and size. This atomic force microscope study has used a mutant lacking the reaction center complex, which normally sits within the LH1 ring providing a barrier to substantial changes in shape. This approach has revealed the inherent flexibility and lack of structural coherence of this complex in a reconstituted lipid bilayer at room temperature. Circular, elliptical, and even polygonal ring shapes as well as arcs and open rings have been observed for LH1; in contrast, no such variations in structure were observed for the LH2 complex under the same conditions. The basis for these differences between LH1 and LH2 is suggested to be the H-bonding patterns that stabilize binding of the bacteriochlorophylls to the LH polypeptides. The existence of open rings and arcs provides a direct visualization of the consequences of the relatively weak associations that govern the aggregation of the protomers (α1β1Bchl2) comprising the LH1 complex. The demonstration that the linkage between adjacent protomer units is flexible and can even be uncoupled at room temperature in a detergent-free membrane bilayer provides a rationale for the dynamic separation of individual protomers, and we may now envisage experiments that seek to prove this active opening process. Photosynthetic organisms harvest light energy and convert it to a chemically useful form, using light harvesting (LH) 1The abbreviations used are: LH, light harvesting; RC, reaction center; Bchl, bacteriochlorophyll; AFM, atomic force microscope; EM, electron microscopy. and reaction center (RC) complexes. In the purple photosynthetic bacteria, the reaction center, which is the site of photochemistry, receives excitation energy from the light harvesting LH1 complex, which receives energy in turn from the LH2 complex (reviewed in Ref. 1Blankenship R.E. Molecular Mechanisms of Photosynthesis. Blackwell Science Ltd., Oxford2002: 61-82Crossref Google Scholar). The atomic structure of the Rhodopseudomonas acidophila LH2 complex (2McDermott G. Prince S.M. Freer A.A. Hawthornthwaite-Lawless A.M. Papiz M.Z. Cogdell R.J. Isaacs N.W. Nature. 1995; 374: 517-521Crossref Scopus (2509) Google Scholar) and the cryo-electron microscopy (EM) structure of the Rhodobacter sphaeroides complex (3Walz T. Jamieson S.J. Bowers C.M. Bullough P.A. Hunter C.N. J. Mol. Biol. 1998; 282: 833-845Crossref PubMed Scopus (249) Google Scholar) both revealed a circular arrangement of nine protomers, each consisting of an α and a β polypeptide. The LH2α polypeptides formed an inner ring, with the β ring outermost; in all, 27 bacteriochlorophyll (Bchl) molecules are bound to this structure (2McDermott G. Prince S.M. Freer A.A. Hawthornthwaite-Lawless A.M. Papiz M.Z. Cogdell R.J. Isaacs N.W. Nature. 1995; 374: 517-521Crossref Scopus (2509) Google Scholar). More recent work has established that LH1 surrounds the RC using an arrangement of 16 αβ protomers and 32 Bchls (4Jamieson S.J. Wang P. Qian P. Kirkland J.Y. Conroy M.J. Hunter C.N. Bullough P.A. EMBO J. 2002; 21: 3927-3935Crossref PubMed Scopus (131) Google Scholar) when there is no prulifloxacin PufX protein. In other bacteria, an LH1 ring of 15 αβ protomers, together with either PufX or a putative PufX homologue (W), form a continuous ring of protein around the RC (5Roszak A.W. Howard T.D. Southall J. Gardiner A.T. Law C.J. Isaacs N.W. Cogdell R.J. Science. 2003; 302: 1969-1972Crossref PubMed Scopus (600) Google Scholar, 6Siebert C.A. Qian P. Fotiadis D. Engel A. Hunter C.N. Bullough P.A. EMBO J. 2004; 23: 690-700Crossref PubMed Scopus (136) Google Scholar). The demonstration of both circular and elliptical forms of this LH1 complex provided evidence for its flexibility (4Jamieson S.J. Wang P. Qian P. Kirkland J.Y. Conroy M.J. Hunter C.N. Bullough P.A. EMBO J. 2002; 21: 3927-3935Crossref PubMed Scopus (131) Google Scholar). This property of the LH1 complex was suggested to be a significant factor in the export of quinol, the product of RC photochemistry, to the cytochrome bc1 complex (4Jamieson S.J. Wang P. Qian P. Kirkland J.Y. Conroy M.J. Hunter C.N. Bullough P.A. EMBO J. 2002; 21: 3927-3935Crossref PubMed Scopus (131) Google Scholar). For organisms such as Rhodospirillum rubrum, which assemble an (αβ)16 LH1 complex completely enclosing the RC, such flexibility would clearly be an essential feature of this LH complex and would imply a dynamic series of conformations in vivo. However, only the extremes of this dynamic population have been reported, and the flexibility hypothesis requires the imaging of several conformations at room temperature. For other photosynthetic bacteria such as R. sphaeroides, Rhodobacter capsulatus, and Rhodopseudomonas palustris other possibilities for quinol export became apparent when it was found that these bacteria assemble another polypeptide, PufX (W), into the LH1 complex. It was discovered that puf X- mutants were unable to photosynthesize (7Farchaus J.W. Oesterhelt D. EMBO J. 1989; 8: 47-54Crossref PubMed Google Scholar, 8Farchaus J.W. Barz W.P. Grunberg H. Oesterhelt D. EMBO J. 1992; 11: 2779-2788Crossref PubMed Scopus (72) Google Scholar); subsequently, such mutants were found to be impaired in their ability to shuttle quinones/quinols in and of the QB site of the RC (9Lilburn T.G. Beatty J.T. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1992; 100: 155-159Google Scholar, 10Barz W.P. Vermeglio A. Francia F. Venturoli G. Melandri B.A. Oesterhelt D. Biochemistry. 1995; 34: 15248-15258Crossref PubMed Scopus (101) Google Scholar). It was suggested that PufX forms part of the LH1 ring, providing a portal for quinol (11Cogdell R.J. Fyfe P.K. Barrett S.J. Prince S.M. Freer A.A. Isaacs N.W. McGlynn P. Hunter C.N. Photosynth. Res. 1996; 48: 55-63Crossref PubMed Scopus (87) Google Scholar). This concept would seem to be supported by work on mutants with an LH1 complex that is too small to completely surround the RC; these mutants can, therefore, allow free movement of quinones/quinols to the RC QB site, and so they are fully capable of photosynthetic growth, even in the absence of PufX (12McGlynn P. Hunter C.N. Jones M.R. FEBS Lett. 1994; 349: 349-353Crossref PubMed Scopus (66) Google Scholar). Studies on RC-LH1-PufX complexes in native membranes show that PufX causes a specific orientation of the RC, which is the likely cause of the long range organization of the core complexes (6Siebert C.A. Qian P. Fotiadis D. Engel A. Hunter C.N. Bullough P.A. EMBO J. 2004; 23: 690-700Crossref PubMed Scopus (136) Google Scholar, 13Frese R.N. Olsen J.D. Branvall R. Westerhuis W.H. Hunter C.N. van Grondelle R. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2000; 97: 5197-5202Crossref PubMed Scopus (87) Google Scholar) and plays a role in organizing the core complex into dimers in detergent-solubilized systems (14Francia F. Wang J. Venturoli G. Melandri B.A. Barz W.P. Oesterhelt D. Biochemistry. 1999; 38: 6834-6845Crossref PubMed Scopus (98) Google Scholar, 15Scheuring S. Francia F. Busselez J. Melandri B.A. Rigaud J.L. Levy D. J. Biol. Chem. 2004; 279: 3620-3626Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (110) Google Scholar). It is not known whether the LH1 complex of R. sphaeroides is flexible, and if so, to what extent; perhaps there is no need if PufX does indeed provide a quinol portal. In terms of LH1 flexibility, we are confined at present to the knowledge, based upon cryo-electron microscopy studies of two-dimensional crystals, that the R. rubrum LH1 complex lacking PufX can assume both circular and elliptical forms. This observation is subject to the limitations that the crystals are frozen in glucose at ∼77 K and that LH1 molecules in disordered regions will not be represented. The use of the atomic force microscope (AFM) to image the surface of two-dimensional crystals presents us with the opportunity to obtain high signal-to-noise data without the need for processing the data, and particularly without the need to obtain large, highly ordered crystals. Previous studies have amply illustrated the usefulness of AFM for imaging two-dimensional crystals of the LH2 complexes of Rubrivivax gelatinosus (16Scheuring S. Reiss-Husson F. Engel A. Rigaud J.L. Ranck J.L. EMBO J. 2001; 20: 3029-3035Crossref PubMed Scopus (110) Google Scholar), R. sphaeroides (17Scheuring S. Seguin J. Marco S. Levy D. Breyton C. Robert B. Rigaud J.L. J. Mol. Biol. 2003; 325: 569-580Crossref PubMed Scopus (76) Google Scholar), and R. acidophila (18Stamouli A. Kafi S. Klein D.C.G. Oosterkamp T.H. Frenken J.W.M. Cogdell R.J. Aartsma T.J. Biophys. J. 2003; 84: 2483-2491Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (39) Google Scholar). Scheuring et al. (19Scheuring S. Seguin J. Marco S. Levy D. Robert B. Rigaud J.L. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2003; 100: 1690-1693Crossref PubMed Scopus (214) Google Scholar) achieved the imaging of native membranes of Blastochloris viridis containing RC-LH1 complexes by AFM and were able to show that LH1 formed an ellipse round the RC, but that it became circular upon removal of the RC. In view of the possible functional significance of alterations in conformation of the LH1 ring, it is important to visualize all of the possible shapes and aggregation states of which LH1 is capable. This should be compared with the peripheral LH2 complex, using the same methodology. Scheuring et al. (17Scheuring S. Seguin J. Marco S. Levy D. Breyton C. Robert B. Rigaud J.L. J. Mol. Biol. 2003; 325: 569-580Crossref PubMed Scopus (76) Google Scholar) have extensively characterized large planar two-dimensional crystals of the LH2 complex from R. sphaeroides by AFM. In our work, we have examined different crystal forms of the LH2 complex, to establish whether alterations in crystal packing produce distortions of the LH2 complex. In this regard, it is already known that lateral packing forces exerted in two-dimensional crystals can distort RC-LH1 complexes into circles or ellipses, depending on whether the crystal form is tetragonal or orthorhombic, respectively (4Jamieson S.J. Wang P. Qian P. Kirkland J.Y. Conroy M.J. Hunter C.N. Bullough P.A. EMBO J. 2002; 21: 3927-3935Crossref PubMed Scopus (131) Google Scholar). Recently, high-resolution AFM was used to image two-dimensional crystals of the RCLH1 complex of R. rubrum (20Fotiadis D. Qian P. Pilippsen A. Bullough P.A. Engel A. Hunter C.N. J. Biol. Chem. 2004; 279: 2063-2068Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (133) Google Scholar). It was shown that the RC-LH1 complex may adopt an irregular shape in regions of uneven packing forces in the crystal, reflecting a likely flexibility when in the natural membrane. This study also imaged a few LH1-only complexes, formed as a consequence of removing the RC with the AFM tip, which showed some of the possibilities for distorting this complex. To examine this in more detail, it is important to obtain images of many LH1 complexes free of the RC; it is only then that the inherent flexibility and even deformability of LH1 will be revealed, because the RC, which sits fairly tightly within the LH1 ring, normally provides a barrier to substantial deformation. We have used AFM to compare two-dimensional crystals of LH1 and of LH2 of R. sphaeroides. We find that the LH2 crystals have three different packing forms and despite the differing packing forces, the complexes are essentially always circular. In contrast, LH1 molecules displayed a wide range of both ring sizes and packing geometries that generated circular, elliptical, and even polygonal ring shapes as well as arcs and open rings. From these data, we conclude that the LH1 ring is intrinsically highly deformable, and we relate this property to the manner in which it is assembled and further to its operation within the photosynthetic unit. Materials—All chemicals were purchased from Sigma (Poole, UK) except the detergent β-OG (n-octyl β-d-glucopyranoside), which was obtained from Calbiochem (Merck Biosciences, Nottingham, UK) and the lipid DOPC (1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine), which was obtained from Avanti Polar Lipids (Alabaster, AL). All chemicals were of Analar or equivalent grade. Strains and Plasmids—The R. sphaeroides strains used have all been described previously: DD13, LH2- LH1- RC- (21Jones M.R. Fowler G.J.S. Gibson L.C.D. Grief G.G. Olsen J.D. Crielaard W. Hunter C.N. Mol. Microbiol. 1992; 6: 1173-1184Crossref PubMed Scopus (148) Google Scholar); DPF2, LH2-only (21Jones M.R. Fowler G.J.S. Gibson L.C.D. Grief G.G. Olsen J.D. Crielaard W. Hunter C.N. Mol. Microbiol. 1992; 6: 1173-1184Crossref PubMed Scopus (148) Google Scholar); E. coli S17-1 (22Simon R. Priefer U. Pühler A. Bio/Technology. 1983; 1: 784-791Crossref Scopus (5658) Google Scholar); DD13(pRKEK1), LH1-only (21Jones M.R. Fowler G.J.S. Gibson L.C.D. Grief G.G. Olsen J.D. Crielaard W. Hunter C.N. Mol. Microbiol. 1992; 6: 1173-1184Crossref PubMed Scopus (148) Google Scholar). The LH2-only strain DPF2 was grown semi-aerobically, and the intracytoplasmic membranes were prepared according to the methods in Olsen et al. (23Olsen J.D. Sockalingum G.D. Robert B. Hunter C.N. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1994; 91: 7124-7128Crossref PubMed Scopus (106) Google Scholar). The plasmid pRKEK1 was introduced into the double-deletion strain DD13 by conjugative transfer. Colonies were examined for the presence of the LH1 wild-type complex using a Guided Wave 260 fiber-optic spectrophotometer and a home-built plate holder. Representative colonies were then grown semi-aerobically in liquid culture, and intracytoplasmic membranes were isolated as described previously (23Olsen J.D. Sockalingum G.D. Robert B. Hunter C.N. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1994; 91: 7124-7128Crossref PubMed Scopus (106) Google Scholar), except that in this work we used a lower growth temperature of 30 °C and then concentrated the membranes by centrifugation at 186,000 × g for 4.5 h after diluting the sucrose present to less than 5%, prior to LH purification. Two-dimensional Crystallization—LH2 was purified and crystallized as described in Waltz et al. (3Walz T. Jamieson S.J. Bowers C.M. Bullough P.A. Hunter C.N. J. Mol. Biol. 1998; 282: 833-845Crossref PubMed Scopus (249) Google Scholar). For LH1, ∼500 absorbance units of concentrated LH1-only membrane sample were solubilized with 1.5 ml of 20% β-OG with gentle stirring at 10 °C and then loaded onto a pre-equilibrated 15-ml DEAE column. The column was washed for an hour at a flow rate of 1 ml/min with 155 mm NaCl, 10 mm Tris, pH 7.5, 1% β-OG, then eluted with a 155-400 mm NaCl salt gradient over 60 min at 1 ml/min. The best fractions were determined by the ratio of the absorbance at ∼850 nm versus 280 nm, and these were used for two-dimensional crystallization trials using the lipid DOPC. Atomic Force Microscopy and Image Processing—Muscovite mica purchased from Ted Pella (Redding, CA) was chosen as a support for the samples. For AFM measurements, the sample of LH2 crystals was prepared by adsorbing 1 μl of sample solution onto the surface of freshly cleaved mica for ∼30 s, then the sample was immersed into the distilled and filtered water for 1 min to remove weakly bound crystal patches. The sample was immediately placed onto the AFM stage, and 300 μl of recording buffer (10 mm Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mm KCl) was added to the liquid cell. For firm attachment of LH1 crystals, the adsorption buffer (10 mm Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mm KCl, 25 mm MgCl2) was applied, and the adsorption time was increased to 1 h. The imaging buffer used was the same as for the LH2 crystals. For the experiments, a home-built stand-alone AFM was employed (24van der Werf K.O. Putman C.A.J. de Grooth B.G. Segerink F.B. Schipper E.H. van Hulst N.F. Greve J. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 1993; 64: 2892-2897Crossref Scopus (80) Google Scholar). Standard silicon nitride cantilevers with a length of 85 μm, force constant of 0.5 N·m, and operating frequencies of 25-35 kHz (in liquid) purchased from ThermoMicroscopes (Sunnyvale, CA) were used. High-resolution AFM images were obtained using tapping mode in liquid with a free amplitude of 2-5 nm; the amplitude setpoint was adjusted to minimal forces (damping of the free amplitude was 10-20%). Images contained 256 × 256 pixels and were recorded at a line frequency of 2-4 Hz. The calibration of the setup was made with UltraSharp Calibration Gratings from NT-MDT (Moscow, Russia). Topographical images were quantitatively analyzed by means of Scanning Probe image processor program (Image Metrology ApS, Lyngby, Denmark). All the images presented here were processed by applying a low-pass filter and are represented in three-dimensional view, unless otherwise specified. Morphology of Two-dimensional Crystals Formed from LH1 Complexes: Comparison with LH2 Crystals—The “empty” LH1 complex containing no RC formed a homogeneous population of planar single-layered crystals between 100 and 700 nm in width (an example of a crystal ∼300 nm in diameter is shown in Fig. 1A). The height of the crystals above the mica surface was 6.7 ± 0.4 nm, (n = 81; Table I, supplemental material). Most of the LH1 crystals displayed dense packing of LH1 complexes, whereas some of the crystals also contained empty areas of lipid bilayer with an average height above the mica surface of 4.1 ± 0.2 nm, n = 20 (Table I, supplemental material). In contrast, tubular crystals (Fig. 1B) were found most frequently for the LH2 complex, some of which had ruptured, forming single-layered sheets up to 1 μm wide. Intact tubes could be distinguished from the single-layered sheets (open tubes) also by analyzing their average height above the mica surface. The height histogram of the accumulated data showed two peaks in the height distribution, 7.2 ± 3.2 nm and 16 ± 2.4 nm (n = 62), corresponding to single-layered sheets and double-layered intact tubular crystals, respectively. Empty lipid patches were also observed for LH2 crystals, with an average height of 4.1 ± 0.1 nm (n = 16), which corresponds well with the number obtained from the analysis of LH1 crystals. Vesicular LH2 crystals (Fig. 1C) were observed less frequently and consisted of small round patches (average diameter ∼ 200 nm). The average height of the vesicular two-dimensional crystals was 15.9 ± 0.8 nm (n = 11). Variations in Packing in Two-dimensional Crystals—The different packing arrangements of LH1-only complexes are shown in Fig. 2, A and B). No long range crystalline ordering was observed for LH1, unlike the situation for LH2 (Fig. 3; Refs. 3Walz T. Jamieson S.J. Bowers C.M. Bullough P.A. Hunter C.N. J. Mol. Biol. 1998; 282: 833-845Crossref PubMed Scopus (249) Google Scholar and 17Scheuring S. Seguin J. Marco S. Levy D. Breyton C. Robert B. Rigaud J.L. J. Mol. Biol. 2003; 325: 569-580Crossref PubMed Scopus (76) Google Scholar). In rare cases, LH1 rings formed small areas of well ordered crystalline lattices with a tentative assignment of hexagonal packing (Fig. 2A). This could only be observed in vesicles of larger than average size, i.e. more than 500 nm. This ordering was also accompanied by a marked preference for a single orientation, as determined by the height of the protruding face of the complex (see Table II, Supplemental material). The majority of LH1 rings (86%) were positioned in the lipid membrane in the “down” orientation, characterized by a height from the lipid surface to the highest point of LH1 of 0.8 ± 0.1 nm (n = 261). In the opposite orientation, this height is 1.4 ± 0.1 nm (n = 43). It should be emphasized that LH1 rings, which tended to be circular in the well ordered areas of crystals (see Fig. 2A), still displayed some heterogeneity in size. For example, the left and right arrows in Fig. 2A indicate ring sizes of 12.6 and 14.1 nm, respectively. The high level of disorder of LH1 aggregates typified by Fig. 2B was accompanied by heterogeneity of the LH1 complexes in terms of differing ring sizes, with each size category displaying at least two different shapes. Broken rings and also incomplete arcs were found.Fig. 3LH2 crystals displaying three types of periodicity. A, type A (zigzag): frame size, 200 × 200 nm2; full gray-scale, 1.8 nm. B, type B (rectangular): frame size, 200 × 200 nm2; full gray-scale, 2.4 nm. C, type C (disordered): frame size, 200 × 200 nm2; full gray-scale, 4.8 nm. D, an LH2 crystal displaying the co-existence of all three types of periodicity: frame size, 500 × 500 nm2; full gray-scale, 10 nm.View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload (PPT) Crystalline packing of LH2 complexes was clearly resolved, and AFM images indicated that this fell into three categories; type A, a zigzag pattern; type B, a rectangular pattern; and type C, disordered. These are displayed separately in Fig. 3; in Fig. 3D, it can be seen that all three types of packing could be found within one crystal. A Fourier transform of AFM images of type A crystals directly allowed the definition of a unit cell (a = 19.9 nm, b = 15.9 nm, γ = 87°). The unit cell encompasses four LH2 rings, two facing upwards and two downwards, which are clearly resolved. One face of the complex protrudes more than the other; the height from the lipid surface to the extremity of LH2 (“up”) was 1.0 ± 0.1 nm (n = 105), and in the opposite orientation (“down”), this was 0.5 ± 0.1 nm (n = 96). This up-down configuration has been reported before from two-dimensional EM data (3Walz T. Jamieson S.J. Bowers C.M. Bullough P.A. Hunter C.N. J. Mol. Biol. 1998; 282: 833-845Crossref PubMed Scopus (249) Google Scholar) and from subsequent AFM studies on LH2 two-dimensional-crystals (16Scheuring S. Reiss-Husson F. Engel A. Rigaud J.L. Ranck J.L. EMBO J. 2001; 20: 3029-3035Crossref PubMed Scopus (110) Google Scholar, 17Scheuring S. Seguin J. Marco S. Levy D. Breyton C. Robert B. Rigaud J.L. J. Mol. Biol. 2003; 325: 569-580Crossref PubMed Scopus (76) Google Scholar). The primary difference between type B and type A crystal packing is that in the former, there is no close contact between adjacent up rings in the unit cell, whereas in type A, they are brought together very closely. Type C crystals do not show any distinct periodical pattern (Fig. 3C), as the LH2 complexes are incorporated into the lipid bilayer in a random, chaotic way. We could not resolve any up-down configuration in this case, but the distance between the up LH2 molecules provides enough space for oppositely oriented rings. Detailed Characteristics of LH1 and LH2 Rings—Fig. 4A shows a high-resolution image of LH1 complexes embedded in a representative, disordered two-dimensional crystal. LH1 complexes displayed a high level of heterogeneity in shapes, sizes, and conformation. In contrast, LH2 complexes showed no such heterogeneity. Fig. 4, B and C show high magnification images of LH2 rings. The most noteworthy finding was that under no circumstances, not even for disordered regions of two-dimensional crystals, did the LH2 complex display the heterogeneity in size and shape we observed for LH1. Regardless of the type of packing or disorder, all LH2 rings appear to be circular and of identical diameter, within experimental error. The average height of strongly protruding (up) and weakly protruding (down) LH2 complexes above the plane of the lipid bilayer was 1.0 and 0.5 nm, respectively. This result is in agreement with the data of Scheuring et al. (17Scheuring S. Seguin J. Marco S. Levy D. Breyton C. Robert B. Rigaud J.L. J. Mol. Biol. 2003; 325: 569-580Crossref PubMed Scopus (76) Google Scholar) on the same complex. From this we conclude that strongly protruded rings correspond to the periplasmic side of the LH2 complex. Without the use of single-particle averaging methods, we found that in some of the LH2 rings, the resolution was high enough to count the number of units per LH2 ring, which was nine. A Variety in Shapes, Sizes, and Conformation for LH1 Complexes—The variety of types of LH1 complex imaged by AFM could be observed from our analysis of ∼300 individual LH1 complexes from ∼10 different membrane patches. An overview of the variation in LH1 complexes is represented in Fig. 5. Circles (Fig. 5, A-C), polygonal rings (Fig. 5D), open rings (Fig. 5E), ellipses (Fig. 5, F-H), and more anomalous structures such as arcs (Fig. 5, I and J) were all observed. Polygonal rings are deformed rings, in which circular or elliptical ring architectures were considerably distorted. The ellipses and circles formed the two major groups, comprising 41 and 35% of the total number of complexes, respectively. Polygonal and open rings were observed less frequently, at 19 and 5%, respectively. The differing ring sizes observed for LH1 had outer diameters of 11.6 ± 0.5 nm, 12.6 ± 0.5 nm, and 14.5 ± 0.8 nm, which are hereafter referred to as small, medium, and large. In the circular LH1 rings, the percentage of small rings (Fig. 5A) was 14%, medium rings (Fig. 5B) were 64%, and large rings (Fig. 5C) were 22%. Using the known size of the αβ-protomer, we suggest that the small rings contain 15 subunits, the medium contain 16, and the large contain 18 subunits. For ellipses, the occurrence of small, medium, and large (Fig. 5, F-H) was 24, 45, and 31%, respectively. The circularity of some of the LH1 complexes was confirmed by the practically equal diameters for two orthogonal directions. For the elliptical complexes, the ratio between short (b) and long (a) axes was found to vary slightly for different sizes: small ellipses, b/a = 0.75; medium and large ellipses, b/a = 0.8. Table II in the supplemental material details other parameters that were measured for LH1 complexes. The height of weakly protruded LH1 rings above the lipid bilayer was 0.8 nm, which is similar to the height of empty LH1 rings on the periplasmic side for the B. viridis complex (19Scheuring S. Seguin J. Marco S. Levy D. Robert B. Rigaud J.L. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2003; 100: 1690-1693Crossref PubMed Scopus (214) Google Scholar). The height of stronger protrusions of the LH1 complexes observed here and ascribed to the cytoplasmic face of the complex was 1.4 nm. The inner diameters of cytoplasmic and periplasmic faces of the small rings were 6.1 and 6.6 nm, respectively, medium rings were 6.5 and 7.3 nm, respectively, and large rings were 7.6 and 9 nm, respectively. Thus, in each case the inner diameter of the strongly protruding cytoplasmic surface of the LH1 rings is noticeably smaller than that of the weakly protruding periplasmic surface. The flexibility, which has been suggested to be a functionally essential property of the LH1 complex, would require a dynamic series of conformations in vivo. We have used AFM to examine a population of LH1 molecules in a membrane environment at room temperature. Our work highlights the extraordinary variety of shapes and sizes exhibited by the isolated LH1 complex. This variety has not been visualized directly before by AFM, because previous studies have concentrated on the RC-LH1 complex, either in native membranes of B. viridis (19Scheuring S. Seguin J. Marco S. Levy D. Robert B. Rigaud J.L. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2003; 100: 1690-1693Crossref PubMed Scopus (214) Google Scholar) or in two-dimensional crystals formed from the R. rubrum (20Fotiadis D. Qian P. Pilippsen A. Bullough P.A. Engel A. Hunter C.N. J. Biol. Chem. 2004; 279: 2063-2068Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (133) Google Scholar) and the R. sphaeroides RC-LH1-PufX complexes (6Siebert C.A. Qian P. Fotiadis D. Engel A. Hunter C.N. Bullough P.A. EMBO J. 2004; 23: 690-700Crossref PubMed Scopus (136) Google Scholar, 15Scheuring S. Francia F. Busselez J. Melandri B.A. Rigaud J.L. Levy D. J. Biol. Chem." @default.
• W2007152413 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2007152413 creator A5011434749 @default.
• W2007152413 creator A5020119152 @default.
• W2007152413 creator A5024707874 @default.
• W2007152413 creator A5035720321 @default.
• W2007152413 creator A5056350473 @default.
• W2007152413 creator A5066054166 @default.
• W2007152413 date "2004-05-01" @default.
• W2007152413 modified "2023-10-09" @default.
• W2007152413 title "Flexibility and Size Heterogeneity of the LH1 Light Harvesting Complex Revealed by Atomic Force Microscopy" @default.
• W2007152413 cites W1005771140 @default.
• W2007152413 cites W139366324 @default.
• W2007152413 cites W1825779169 @default.
• W2007152413 cites W1925836704 @default.
• W2007152413 cites W1964954369 @default.
• W2007152413 cites W1968578245 @default.
• W2007152413 cites W1977040915 @default.
• W2007152413 cites W1983011422 @default.
• W2007152413 cites W2010401965 @default.
• W2007152413 cites W2012111341 @default.
• W2007152413 cites W2017627877 @default.
• W2007152413 cites W2027207762 @default.
• W2007152413 cites W2027229485 @default.
• W2007152413 cites W2029524828 @default.
• W2007152413 cites W2031957405 @default.
• W2007152413 cites W2032233596 @default.
• W2007152413 cites W2032525557 @default.
• W2007152413 cites W2043032327 @default.
• W2007152413 cites W2045906450 @default.
• W2007152413 cites W2051954220 @default.
• W2007152413 cites W2057544559 @default.
• W2007152413 cites W2057975559 @default.
• W2007152413 cites W2064542583 @default.
• W2007152413 cites W2070330152 @default.
• W2007152413 cites W2075720695 @default.
• W2007152413 cites W2076207822 @default.
• W2007152413 cites W2079101272 @default.
• W2007152413 cites W2081130319 @default.
• W2007152413 cites W2087046756 @default.
• W2007152413 cites W2091142459 @default.
• W2007152413 cites W2110151623 @default.
• W2007152413 cites W2112057611 @default.
• W2007152413 cites W2118465942 @default.
• W2007152413 cites W2129664178 @default.
• W2007152413 cites W2139541157 @default.
• W2007152413 cites W2141351896 @default.
• W2007152413 cites W2152893165 @default.
• W2007152413 cites W2153439123 @default.
• W2007152413 cites W2267897053 @default.
• W2007152413 doi "https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.m313039200" @default.
• W2007152413 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14993213" @default.
• W2007152413 hasPublicationYear "2004" @default.
• W2007152413 type Work @default.
• W2007152413 sameAs 2007152413 @default.
• W2007152413 citedByCount "115" @default.
• W2007152413 countsByYear W20071524132012 @default.
• W2007152413 countsByYear W20071524132013 @default.
• W2007152413 countsByYear W20071524132014 @default.
• W2007152413 countsByYear W20071524132015 @default.
• W2007152413 countsByYear W20071524132016 @default.
• W2007152413 countsByYear W20071524132017 @default.
• W2007152413 countsByYear W20071524132019 @default.
• W2007152413 countsByYear W20071524132021 @default.
• W2007152413 countsByYear W20071524132022 @default.
• W2007152413 countsByYear W20071524132023 @default.
• W2007152413 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2007152413 hasAuthorship W2007152413A5011434749 @default.
• W2007152413 hasAuthorship W2007152413A5020119152 @default.
• W2007152413 hasAuthorship W2007152413A5024707874 @default.
• W2007152413 hasAuthorship W2007152413A5035720321 @default.
• W2007152413 hasAuthorship W2007152413A5056350473 @default.
• W2007152413 hasAuthorship W2007152413A5066054166 @default.
• W2007152413 hasBestOaLocation W20071524131 @default.
• W2007152413 hasConcept C102951782 @default.
• W2007152413 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2007152413 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W2007152413 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2007152413 hasConcept C12554922 @default.
• W2007152413 hasConcept C147080431 @default.
• W2007152413 hasConcept C159467904 @default.
• W2007152413 hasConcept C171250308 @default.
• W2007152413 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2007152413 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2007152413 hasConcept C2780598303 @default.
• W2007152413 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2007152413 hasConcept C8010536 @default.
• W2007152413 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2007152413 hasConceptScore W2007152413C102951782 @default.
• W2007152413 hasConceptScore W2007152413C105795698 @default.
• W2007152413 hasConceptScore W2007152413C120665830 @default.
• W2007152413 hasConceptScore W2007152413C121332964 @default.
• W2007152413 hasConceptScore W2007152413C12554922 @default.
• W2007152413 hasConceptScore W2007152413C147080431 @default.
• W2007152413 hasConceptScore W2007152413C159467904 @default.
• W2007152413 hasConceptScore W2007152413C171250308 @default.
• W2007152413 hasConceptScore W2007152413C185592680 @default.
• W2007152413 hasConceptScore W2007152413C192562407 @default.

• next