FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2007409321> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2007409321 endingPage "51" @default.
• W2007409321 startingPage "41" @default.
• W2007409321 abstract "Over the last two decades magnets have been used in orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics and attempts have been made to evaluate the biological implications of magnets and magnetic fields. This review aims to indicate the advantages and disadvantages of magnets in orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics when compared with traditional techniques and also to update related clinical experiences especially on mandibular growth modification. The use of magnetic forces in the treatment of Class II malocclusions seems to represent another reliable approach and should be further investigated and compared with more traditional treatment modalities, especially with the use of the Twin Block appliance. The advantages of magnets over traditional force delivery systems are: frictionless mechanics, predictable force levels and force direction when the magnets are in attractive configuration, no force decay over time, and less patient cooperation. However, force decay with the separation of the magnets is very significant and that is why the size of the magnets is relatively large, thus increasing the bulk of the appliance. Three-dimensional control is limited when the magnets are in repulsive configuration and requires auxiliary guiding mechanisms. In addition, magnets used in vivo require coating to prevent corrosion and the possible side effects of corrosive products. Over the last two decades magnets have been used in orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics and attempts have been made to evaluate the biological implications of magnets and magnetic fields. This review aims to indicate the advantages and disadvantages of magnets in orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics when compared with traditional techniques and also to update related clinical experiences especially on mandibular growth modification. The use of magnetic forces in the treatment of Class II malocclusions seems to represent another reliable approach and should be further investigated and compared with more traditional treatment modalities, especially with the use of the Twin Block appliance. The advantages of magnets over traditional force delivery systems are: frictionless mechanics, predictable force levels and force direction when the magnets are in attractive configuration, no force decay over time, and less patient cooperation. However, force decay with the separation of the magnets is very significant and that is why the size of the magnets is relatively large, thus increasing the bulk of the appliance. Three-dimensional control is limited when the magnets are in repulsive configuration and requires auxiliary guiding mechanisms. In addition, magnets used in vivo require coating to prevent corrosion and the possible side effects of corrosive products." @default.
• W2007409321 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2007409321 creator A5050927405 @default.
• W2007409321 date "2006-03-01" @default.
• W2007409321 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2007409321 title "Use of Magnetic Forces in Growth Modification" @default.
• W2007409321 cites W1967661441 @default.
• W2007409321 cites W1974431602 @default.
• W2007409321 cites W1978845667 @default.
• W2007409321 cites W1983637618 @default.
• W2007409321 cites W1984312578 @default.
• W2007409321 cites W1987096665 @default.
• W2007409321 cites W1994495663 @default.
• W2007409321 cites W1998087825 @default.
• W2007409321 cites W1999335808 @default.
• W2007409321 cites W2005267141 @default.
• W2007409321 cites W2018857761 @default.
• W2007409321 cites W2052643135 @default.
• W2007409321 cites W2064334570 @default.
• W2007409321 cites W2067088524 @default.
• W2007409321 cites W2080522074 @default.
• W2007409321 cites W2085242557 @default.
• W2007409321 cites W2085571647 @default.
• W2007409321 cites W2087543292 @default.
• W2007409321 cites W2088992616 @default.
• W2007409321 cites W2092301729 @default.
• W2007409321 cites W2108358165 @default.
• W2007409321 cites W2109049766 @default.
• W2007409321 cites W2128116539 @default.
• W2007409321 cites W2321501308 @default.
• W2007409321 cites W2325049658 @default.
• W2007409321 cites W2461659648 @default.
• W2007409321 cites W4233186988 @default.
• W2007409321 cites W4233963318 @default.
• W2007409321 cites W4252670997 @default.
• W2007409321 doi "https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2005.10.008" @default.
• W2007409321 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
• W2007409321 type Work @default.
• W2007409321 sameAs 2007409321 @default.
• W2007409321 citedByCount "9" @default.
• W2007409321 countsByYear W20074093212012 @default.
• W2007409321 countsByYear W20074093212013 @default.
• W2007409321 countsByYear W20074093212014 @default.
• W2007409321 countsByYear W20074093212018 @default.
• W2007409321 countsByYear W20074093212020 @default.
• W2007409321 countsByYear W20074093212021 @default.
• W2007409321 countsByYear W20074093212022 @default.
• W2007409321 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2007409321 hasAuthorship W2007409321A5050927405 @default.
• W2007409321 hasConcept C115260700 @default.
• W2007409321 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2007409321 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2007409321 hasConcept C136229726 @default.
• W2007409321 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2007409321 hasConcept C162565982 @default.
• W2007409321 hasConcept C16389437 @default.
• W2007409321 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2007409321 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W2007409321 hasConcept C32546565 @default.
• W2007409321 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2007409321 hasConcept C57482977 @default.
• W2007409321 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W2007409321 hasConcept C68312169 @default.
• W2007409321 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2007409321 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
• W2007409321 hasConceptScore W2007409321C115260700 @default.
• W2007409321 hasConceptScore W2007409321C121332964 @default.
• W2007409321 hasConceptScore W2007409321C127413603 @default.
• W2007409321 hasConceptScore W2007409321C136229726 @default.
• W2007409321 hasConceptScore W2007409321C141071460 @default.
• W2007409321 hasConceptScore W2007409321C162565982 @default.
• W2007409321 hasConceptScore W2007409321C16389437 @default.
• W2007409321 hasConceptScore W2007409321C192562407 @default.
• W2007409321 hasConceptScore W2007409321C29694066 @default.
• W2007409321 hasConceptScore W2007409321C32546565 @default.
• W2007409321 hasConceptScore W2007409321C41008148 @default.
• W2007409321 hasConceptScore W2007409321C57482977 @default.
• W2007409321 hasConceptScore W2007409321C62520636 @default.
• W2007409321 hasConceptScore W2007409321C68312169 @default.
• W2007409321 hasConceptScore W2007409321C71924100 @default.
• W2007409321 hasConceptScore W2007409321C78519656 @default.
• W2007409321 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2007409321 hasLocation W20074093211 @default.
• W2007409321 hasOpenAccess W2007409321 @default.
• W2007409321 hasPrimaryLocation W20074093211 @default.
• W2007409321 hasRelatedWork W2023639896 @default.
• W2007409321 hasRelatedWork W2034657949 @default.
• W2007409321 hasRelatedWork W2037585162 @default.
• W2007409321 hasRelatedWork W2153190464 @default.
• W2007409321 hasRelatedWork W2271778374 @default.
• W2007409321 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2007409321 hasRelatedWork W2907544439 @default.
• W2007409321 hasRelatedWork W3183554391 @default.
• W2007409321 hasRelatedWork W4286988261 @default.
• W2007409321 hasRelatedWork W75662594 @default.
• W2007409321 hasVolume "12" @default.
• W2007409321 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2007409321 isRetracted "false" @default.

• next