FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2007599990> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2007599990 endingPage "505" @default.
• W2007599990 startingPage "491" @default.
• W2007599990 abstract "Radical media can be viewed as an extremely democratic form of communication, where people normally denied access to the mainstream media are able to speak on issues that concern them. Radical media are especially important for new social movements, where activist-journalists seek to establish a counter-discourse to those typically found in mainstream media. One striking technique employed in radical media is native reporting, where first-person, activist accounts of events are preferred over more detached commentaries. Most accounts of radical media have treated such practices as unique and defining characteristics of radical media. Little attention has been paid to how these practices might be employed by mainstream media, or indeed to how radical media might borrow practices from the mainstream. This paper moves away from previous binary approaches to explore the relations between radical and mainstream media through a comparative analysis of the coverage of the protests at the G8 summit, held in Genoa in July 2001. The paper argues that borrowings and interdependency are most likely to come from papers that share a similar ideology; hence it compares a member of the UK radical press ( SchNEWS ) with a member of the liberal press ( The Guardian ). The analysis is hegemonic, and is particularly interested in how transfers of journalistic techniques, values and ideologies are transformed under differing conditions. Is a counterhegemonic discourse inevitably diluted by the adoption of its primary features in the mainstream press? Is it possible to radicalise mainstream journalistic practices? The analysis focuses on the presence and nature of witnessing by activists, the stylistic construction of such witnessing and how such techniques are transformed in the liberal press. It also examines relationships and attitudes between radical and mainstream journalists. The paper finds that whilst there are distinctive journalistic techniques used in each paper, both radical and mainstream adopt elements from each other, whether in writing style or in news values and framing. The counter-discourse of radical media appears to gain strength from its borrowings. It is argued that the liberal press's use of native reporting represents an accommodation with a radical technique. Finally, a hegemonic approach suggests a complexity of relations between radical and mainstream that previous binary models have not been able to identify." @default.
• W2007599990 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2007599990 creator A5023837956 @default.
• W2007599990 date "2002-01-01" @default.
• W2007599990 modified "2023-10-05" @default.
• W2007599990 title "News Cultures and New Social Movements: radical journalism and the mainstream media" @default.
• W2007599990 cites W1501835616 @default.
• W2007599990 cites W2483228081 @default.
• W2007599990 cites W4249521109 @default.
• W2007599990 doi "https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670022000019209" @default.
• W2007599990 hasPublicationYear "2002" @default.
• W2007599990 type Work @default.
• W2007599990 sameAs 2007599990 @default.
• W2007599990 citedByCount "78" @default.
• W2007599990 countsByYear W20075999902012 @default.
• W2007599990 countsByYear W20075999902013 @default.
• W2007599990 countsByYear W20075999902014 @default.
• W2007599990 countsByYear W20075999902015 @default.
• W2007599990 countsByYear W20075999902016 @default.
• W2007599990 countsByYear W20075999902018 @default.
• W2007599990 countsByYear W20075999902019 @default.
• W2007599990 countsByYear W20075999902020 @default.
• W2007599990 countsByYear W20075999902021 @default.
• W2007599990 countsByYear W20075999902022 @default.
• W2007599990 countsByYear W20075999902023 @default.
• W2007599990 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2007599990 hasAuthorship W2007599990A5023837956 @default.
• W2007599990 hasConcept C135121143 @default.
• W2007599990 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2007599990 hasConcept C158071213 @default.
• W2007599990 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2007599990 hasConcept C190475667 @default.
• W2007599990 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2007599990 hasConcept C2777617010 @default.
• W2007599990 hasConcept C29595303 @default.
• W2007599990 hasConcept C536601067 @default.
• W2007599990 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W2007599990 hasConceptScore W2007599990C135121143 @default.
• W2007599990 hasConceptScore W2007599990C144024400 @default.
• W2007599990 hasConceptScore W2007599990C158071213 @default.
• W2007599990 hasConceptScore W2007599990C17744445 @default.
• W2007599990 hasConceptScore W2007599990C190475667 @default.
• W2007599990 hasConceptScore W2007599990C199539241 @default.
• W2007599990 hasConceptScore W2007599990C2777617010 @default.
• W2007599990 hasConceptScore W2007599990C29595303 @default.
• W2007599990 hasConceptScore W2007599990C536601067 @default.
• W2007599990 hasConceptScore W2007599990C94625758 @default.
• W2007599990 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2007599990 hasLocation W20075999901 @default.
• W2007599990 hasOpenAccess W2007599990 @default.
• W2007599990 hasPrimaryLocation W20075999901 @default.
• W2007599990 hasRelatedWork W1910866971 @default.
• W2007599990 hasRelatedWork W2049389301 @default.
• W2007599990 hasRelatedWork W2051913124 @default.
• W2007599990 hasRelatedWork W2227567691 @default.
• W2007599990 hasRelatedWork W2278675928 @default.
• W2007599990 hasRelatedWork W2625726574 @default.
• W2007599990 hasRelatedWork W2803800026 @default.
• W2007599990 hasRelatedWork W4233605471 @default.
• W2007599990 hasRelatedWork W4239008809 @default.
• W2007599990 hasRelatedWork W4281688535 @default.
• W2007599990 hasVolume "3" @default.
• W2007599990 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2007599990 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2007599990 magId "2007599990" @default.
• W2007599990 workType "article" @default.