FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2007642968> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2007642968 endingPage "32" @default.
• W2007642968 startingPage "27" @default.
• W2007642968 abstract "In Brief To initiate a database on material properties of typical laminations used in prosthetic limb sockets, the authors subjected samples of common prosthetic laminations to tensile and bending tests. Eight varieties of lay-up materials (fibers) were each laminated separately with one of three common resins (matrix), resulting in 24 combinations of fiber/resin laminates. In addition to composition, the bending responses of various carbon fiber laminations were measured to evaluate the role of layer placement on bending strength. Results showed that formulations grouped into three categories based on mechanical strengths: the weakest were laminates with fibers of perlon or nyglass stockinette, spectralon, nylon, and cotton, ranging between 18 and 42 megapascals (MPa); the midrange was fiberglass, ranging between 67 and 109 MPa; the highest strengths were found in carbon fiber laminates, ranging between 236 and 249 MPa. Lamination Resin 80-20 (IPOS, Bauerfeind Prosthetics, USA, Kennesaw, GA) had higher ultimate tensile strength (UTS) than did Laminhartz 80-20 (Otto Bock, Healthcare, Minneapolis, MN) for perlon, nylon, cotton, nyglass, spectralon, fiberglass matte, and fiberglass cloth. Lamination Resin 80-20 had higher UTS than did Epoxyacryl (Foresee, Orthopedic Products, Oakdale, CA) for nyglass. Epoxyacryl had higher UTS than did Laminhartz 80-20 for nylon, cotton, spectra, and fiberglass cloth. No significance was achieved for carbon cloth. Bending tests on carbon fiber lay-ups showed that strength increased as the separation between layers increased linearly with R2 = 0.868. These data provide a preliminary database of material strengths of typical laminations and suggest the utility of minimum standards for prosthetic laminations. To initiate a database on material properties of typical laminations used in prosthetic limb sockets, the authors subjected samples of common prosthetic laminations to tensile and bending tests. Eight varieties of lay-up materials (fibers) were each laminated separately with one of three common resins (matrix), resulting in 24 combinations of fiber/resin laminates. In addition to composition, the bending responses of various carbon fiber laminations were measured to evaluate the role of layer placement on bending strength. Results showed that formulations grouped into three categories based on mechanical strengths. These data provide a preliminary database of material strengths of typical laminations and suggest the utility of minimum standards for prosthetic laminations." @default.
• W2007642968 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2007642968 creator A5007478950 @default.
• W2007642968 creator A5038667296 @default.
• W2007642968 date "2005-01-01" @default.
• W2007642968 modified "2023-10-13" @default.
• W2007642968 title "Material Properties of Selected Prosthetic Laminates" @default.
• W2007642968 cites W1939401323 @default.
• W2007642968 cites W2017459441 @default.
• W2007642968 cites W2133209101 @default.
• W2007642968 cites W2162992881 @default.
• W2007642968 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/00008526-200501000-00007" @default.
• W2007642968 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
• W2007642968 type Work @default.
• W2007642968 sameAs 2007642968 @default.
• W2007642968 citedByCount "34" @default.
• W2007642968 countsByYear W20076429682012 @default.
• W2007642968 countsByYear W20076429682013 @default.
• W2007642968 countsByYear W20076429682015 @default.
• W2007642968 countsByYear W20076429682017 @default.
• W2007642968 countsByYear W20076429682019 @default.
• W2007642968 countsByYear W20076429682020 @default.
• W2007642968 countsByYear W20076429682021 @default.
• W2007642968 countsByYear W20076429682022 @default.
• W2007642968 countsByYear W20076429682023 @default.
• W2007642968 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2007642968 hasAuthorship W2007642968A5007478950 @default.
• W2007642968 hasAuthorship W2007642968A5038667296 @default.
• W2007642968 hasConcept C112950240 @default.
• W2007642968 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W2007642968 hasConcept C178405089 @default.
• W2007642968 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2007642968 hasConcept C2777557983 @default.
• W2007642968 hasConcept C2779227376 @default.
• W2007642968 hasConcept C519885992 @default.
• W2007642968 hasConcept C87210426 @default.
• W2007642968 hasConceptScore W2007642968C112950240 @default.
• W2007642968 hasConceptScore W2007642968C159985019 @default.
• W2007642968 hasConceptScore W2007642968C178405089 @default.
• W2007642968 hasConceptScore W2007642968C192562407 @default.
• W2007642968 hasConceptScore W2007642968C2777557983 @default.
• W2007642968 hasConceptScore W2007642968C2779227376 @default.
• W2007642968 hasConceptScore W2007642968C519885992 @default.
• W2007642968 hasConceptScore W2007642968C87210426 @default.
• W2007642968 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2007642968 hasLocation W20076429681 @default.
• W2007642968 hasOpenAccess W2007642968 @default.
• W2007642968 hasPrimaryLocation W20076429681 @default.
• W2007642968 hasRelatedWork W2166444660 @default.
• W2007642968 hasRelatedWork W2276436827 @default.
• W2007642968 hasRelatedWork W2353518407 @default.
• W2007642968 hasRelatedWork W2371481625 @default.
• W2007642968 hasRelatedWork W2384056497 @default.
• W2007642968 hasRelatedWork W2738762481 @default.
• W2007642968 hasRelatedWork W2951233773 @default.
• W2007642968 hasRelatedWork W3128604154 @default.
• W2007642968 hasRelatedWork W4223523217 @default.
• W2007642968 hasRelatedWork W2082903285 @default.
• W2007642968 hasVolume "17" @default.
• W2007642968 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2007642968 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2007642968 magId "2007642968" @default.
• W2007642968 workType "article" @default.