FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2007665229> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2007665229 endingPage "370" @default.
• W2007665229 startingPage "341" @default.
• W2007665229 abstract "TO BEGIN project, I carried out a quick literature review to generate information about various applications of British Sign Language (BSL) Stokoe notation. An informal email exchange elicited information from very small group of academics who use BSL Stokoe notation, predominantly in United Kingdom. Next I formulated a set of characteristics, constructed a Latin alphabet, and prepared two new proposals for BSL Stokoe-type designs. The project was a small one, and time restraints did not allow for testing and feedback of proposals; hence this article in part also encourages feedback from other users of sign language notation systems. For now, therefore, project's conclusions, although they fully satisfy original project objectives, are limited to resolution of issues in proposed new character drawings, which are listed in appendix. Despite focus on type design, project deals with one key sign linguistic issue: representation of simultaneity/sequentiality in sign movement. Nevertheless, this article also aims to introduce overlapping concerns, those that belong to typographical linguistics. What exactly concerns of such a discipline might be have yet to be distilled from relevant issues in a wide range of subdisciplines, but more common phrase the language of design gives an idea of semiotic aspects they might cover. Because this project concerns of type, a character set to represent symbols of, in this case, BSL Stokoe notation (an extended variant of ASL Stokoe notation), one might consider focus to be on minimal units of such a typographical linguistics, for example, paying attention to individual strokes that constitute an individual character shape. For typographer (and in information technology [IT] environments, authors are ever closer to executing proper typographic tasks) choice of type is, together with choice of paper and page layout, one of first concerns in shaping a text. Allegro: Composing Text I fashion a book of words, sentences, paragraphs and chapters. I am author of this book. I fashion a book of words, lines, pages and signatures.1 I am designer of this book. The first book consists of language, and its words are in first place intelligible [verstaanbaar]. The second book consists of paper, and its words are in first place visible [zichtbaar].... For designer there is no need to visualize language I write as author because I already did this as author in preparing text that serves as copy to designer. The designer fashions-from author's book-a book. (Noordzij 2000, 6-7; my translation from Dutch) Inevitably there are huge problems.... [E]ven at level of deciding on symbols to use, process is a long one. (Bristol Sign Language Group 1979, 1) These two quotes are in direct opposition to each other. In first quote, Dutch designer Gerrit Noordzij establishes a clear separation of overlapping responsibilities shared by author and designer of a book. But distinction Noordzij makes is less clearly common one between form and content of a book as it is a deeper-level distinction between two different manifestations of language. In Noordzij's projection clear communication between author and readership is established only as a result of successful partnership between author and designer. Each contributes particular language skills in making of a book. Although without author there will be no book, without designer there can be no book. These two statements are subtly but critically different. In his keynote address to Association Typographique Internationale (ATYPI) conference at University of Reading in 1997, Crystal (1998) targeted this area of linguistic overlap; his speech was called Towards a Typographical Linguistics. In history of book, another emerging subfield, distinction Noordzij makes is also of concern: [B]ooks no longer figure as mere vehicles or packaging of texts; rather their material constitution-wise-en-livre-and layout and typography-mise-en-page-are recognized as crucial in recruiting readers and conditioning ways in which they read. …" @default.
• W2007665229 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2007665229 creator A5077423511 @default.
• W2007665229 date "2003-01-01" @default.
• W2007665229 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2007665229 title "The British Sign Language Variant of Stokoe Notation: Report on a Type-Design Project" @default.
• W2007665229 cites W1541431938 @default.
• W2007665229 cites W1566996930 @default.
• W2007665229 cites W1974676559 @default.
• W2007665229 cites W2054677843 @default.
• W2007665229 cites W2061248998 @default.
• W2007665229 cites W2075284930 @default.
• W2007665229 cites W2091636093 @default.
• W2007665229 cites W2099302112 @default.
• W2007665229 cites W2123785711 @default.
• W2007665229 cites W234616782 @default.
• W2007665229 cites W642184868 @default.
• W2007665229 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2003.0010" @default.
• W2007665229 hasPublicationYear "2003" @default.
• W2007665229 type Work @default.
• W2007665229 sameAs 2007665229 @default.
• W2007665229 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2007665229 countsByYear W20076652292014 @default.
• W2007665229 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2007665229 hasAuthorship W2007665229A5077423511 @default.
• W2007665229 hasConcept C134306372 @default.
• W2007665229 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2007665229 hasConcept C139676723 @default.
• W2007665229 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W2007665229 hasConcept C2776737515 @default.
• W2007665229 hasConcept C2777299769 @default.
• W2007665229 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2007665229 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2007665229 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2007665229 hasConcept C45357846 @default.
• W2007665229 hasConcept C522192633 @default.
• W2007665229 hasConcept C72280650 @default.
• W2007665229 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2007665229 hasConcept C95232854 @default.
• W2007665229 hasConceptScore W2007665229C134306372 @default.
• W2007665229 hasConceptScore W2007665229C138885662 @default.
• W2007665229 hasConceptScore W2007665229C139676723 @default.
• W2007665229 hasConceptScore W2007665229C18903297 @default.
• W2007665229 hasConceptScore W2007665229C2776737515 @default.
• W2007665229 hasConceptScore W2007665229C2777299769 @default.
• W2007665229 hasConceptScore W2007665229C33923547 @default.
• W2007665229 hasConceptScore W2007665229C41008148 @default.
• W2007665229 hasConceptScore W2007665229C41895202 @default.
• W2007665229 hasConceptScore W2007665229C45357846 @default.
• W2007665229 hasConceptScore W2007665229C522192633 @default.
• W2007665229 hasConceptScore W2007665229C72280650 @default.
• W2007665229 hasConceptScore W2007665229C86803240 @default.
• W2007665229 hasConceptScore W2007665229C95232854 @default.
• W2007665229 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2007665229 hasLocation W20076652291 @default.
• W2007665229 hasOpenAccess W2007665229 @default.
• W2007665229 hasPrimaryLocation W20076652291 @default.
• W2007665229 hasRelatedWork W189855193 @default.
• W2007665229 hasRelatedWork W1970382085 @default.
• W2007665229 hasRelatedWork W2012487884 @default.
• W2007665229 hasRelatedWork W2111792095 @default.
• W2007665229 hasRelatedWork W2142588573 @default.
• W2007665229 hasRelatedWork W2479017708 @default.
• W2007665229 hasRelatedWork W2803416324 @default.
• W2007665229 hasRelatedWork W2950339701 @default.
• W2007665229 hasRelatedWork W4247749841 @default.
• W2007665229 hasRelatedWork W139472467 @default.
• W2007665229 hasVolume "3" @default.
• W2007665229 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2007665229 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2007665229 magId "2007665229" @default.
• W2007665229 workType "article" @default.