FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2008093961> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2008093961 endingPage "2108" @default.
• W2008093961 startingPage "2101" @default.
• W2008093961 abstract "BackgroundDilation of the aorta is a frequent complication in patients with bicuspid aortic valves. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between the subtype of leaflet fusion, right and noncoronary leaflet (R/N) fusion versus right and left leaflet (R/L) fusion, and the patterns of aortic dilation and valve dysfunction in young patients with bicuspid aortic valves.MethodsWe performed a retrospective review of 642 patients who presented with bicuspid aortic valves between 1994 and 2014. Of these patients, 210 (33%) had aortic dilation (z score >3) by echocardiogram. For each patient, the most recent study or the last study before intervention was reviewed.ResultsMedian patient age was 15 years (range, 0 to 40 years) with patients with R/N fusion being younger. The most prevalent subtype was R/N fusion (R/N, n = 114, 54% versus R/L, n = 96, 46%). Dilation of the ascending aorta was seen more often in patients with R/N fusion (R/N, 88% versus R/L, 68%; p = 0.004), whereas the prevalence of dilation of the sinuses of Valsalva was significantly higher in patients with R/L fusion (R/L, 46% versus R/N, 20%; p = 0.01). The magnitude of dilation differed as well. The z value of the sinuses of Valsalva was significantly higher in patients with R/L fusion (R/L, 2.03 versus R/N, 1.2; p = 0.003), whereas the z values of the ascending aorta and sinotubular junction were similar between the groups. Patients with R/N fusion were more likely to have aortic stenosis, and within the R/N group, patients with aortic insufficiency had a greater degree of ascending aorta dilation (p = 0.04).ConclusionsOur study suggests that in young patients with bicuspid aortic valves and aortic dilation, aortic valve morphology may be associated with the patterns of aortic dilation and valve dysfunction. Patients with R/N fusion were more likely to have ascending aorta dilation, whereas patients with R/L fusion were more likely to have dilation of the aortic root. In addition, patients with R/N fusion presented at a younger age and were more likely to have aortic stenosis. Recognition of these differences may eventually be helpful for patient counseling and the planning of follow-up. Dilation of the aorta is a frequent complication in patients with bicuspid aortic valves. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between the subtype of leaflet fusion, right and noncoronary leaflet (R/N) fusion versus right and left leaflet (R/L) fusion, and the patterns of aortic dilation and valve dysfunction in young patients with bicuspid aortic valves. We performed a retrospective review of 642 patients who presented with bicuspid aortic valves between 1994 and 2014. Of these patients, 210 (33%) had aortic dilation (z score >3) by echocardiogram. For each patient, the most recent study or the last study before intervention was reviewed. Median patient age was 15 years (range, 0 to 40 years) with patients with R/N fusion being younger. The most prevalent subtype was R/N fusion (R/N, n = 114, 54% versus R/L, n = 96, 46%). Dilation of the ascending aorta was seen more often in patients with R/N fusion (R/N, 88% versus R/L, 68%; p = 0.004), whereas the prevalence of dilation of the sinuses of Valsalva was significantly higher in patients with R/L fusion (R/L, 46% versus R/N, 20%; p = 0.01). The magnitude of dilation differed as well. The z value of the sinuses of Valsalva was significantly higher in patients with R/L fusion (R/L, 2.03 versus R/N, 1.2; p = 0.003), whereas the z values of the ascending aorta and sinotubular junction were similar between the groups. Patients with R/N fusion were more likely to have aortic stenosis, and within the R/N group, patients with aortic insufficiency had a greater degree of ascending aorta dilation (p = 0.04). Our study suggests that in young patients with bicuspid aortic valves and aortic dilation, aortic valve morphology may be associated with the patterns of aortic dilation and valve dysfunction. Patients with R/N fusion were more likely to have ascending aorta dilation, whereas patients with R/L fusion were more likely to have dilation of the aortic root. In addition, patients with R/N fusion presented at a younger age and were more likely to have aortic stenosis. Recognition of these differences may eventually be helpful for patient counseling and the planning of follow-up." @default.
• W2008093961 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2008093961 creator A5005554115 @default.
• W2008093961 creator A5040801716 @default.
• W2008093961 creator A5045782110 @default.
• W2008093961 creator A5066577149 @default.
• W2008093961 date "2015-06-01" @default.
• W2008093961 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2008093961 title "The Association Between Aortic Valve Leaflet Morphology and Patterns of Aortic Dilation in Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Valves" @default.
• W2008093961 cites W1988572199 @default.
• W2008093961 cites W1989927675 @default.
• W2008093961 cites W1997543742 @default.
• W2008093961 cites W2001437184 @default.
• W2008093961 cites W2016200696 @default.
• W2008093961 cites W2022348836 @default.
• W2008093961 cites W2024501213 @default.
• W2008093961 cites W2045050766 @default.
• W2008093961 cites W2056005381 @default.
• W2008093961 cites W2072371345 @default.
• W2008093961 cites W2076890216 @default.
• W2008093961 cites W2080589020 @default.
• W2008093961 cites W2093210285 @default.
• W2008093961 cites W2105106083 @default.
• W2008093961 cites W2110477765 @default.
• W2008093961 cites W2124185664 @default.
• W2008093961 cites W2125911576 @default.
• W2008093961 cites W2126590207 @default.
• W2008093961 cites W2134187895 @default.
• W2008093961 cites W2141131882 @default.
• W2008093961 cites W2166808851 @default.
• W2008093961 cites W4367667216 @default.
• W2008093961 cites W2339144273 @default.
• W2008093961 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.02.036" @default.
• W2008093961 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25921253" @default.
• W2008093961 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2008093961 type Work @default.
• W2008093961 sameAs 2008093961 @default.
• W2008093961 citedByCount "36" @default.
• W2008093961 countsByYear W20080939612016 @default.
• W2008093961 countsByYear W20080939612017 @default.
• W2008093961 countsByYear W20080939612018 @default.
• W2008093961 countsByYear W20080939612019 @default.
• W2008093961 countsByYear W20080939612020 @default.
• W2008093961 countsByYear W20080939612021 @default.
• W2008093961 countsByYear W20080939612023 @default.
• W2008093961 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2008093961 hasAuthorship W2008093961A5005554115 @default.
• W2008093961 hasAuthorship W2008093961A5040801716 @default.
• W2008093961 hasAuthorship W2008093961A5045782110 @default.
• W2008093961 hasAuthorship W2008093961A5066577149 @default.
• W2008093961 hasBestOaLocation W20080939611 @default.
• W2008093961 hasConcept C114614502 @default.
• W2008093961 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2008093961 hasConcept C164705383 @default.
• W2008093961 hasConcept C2778249958 @default.
• W2008093961 hasConcept C2779980429 @default.
• W2008093961 hasConcept C2780714102 @default.
• W2008093961 hasConcept C2780757906 @default.
• W2008093961 hasConcept C2781355080 @default.
• W2008093961 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2008093961 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2008093961 hasConceptScore W2008093961C114614502 @default.
• W2008093961 hasConceptScore W2008093961C126322002 @default.
• W2008093961 hasConceptScore W2008093961C164705383 @default.
• W2008093961 hasConceptScore W2008093961C2778249958 @default.
• W2008093961 hasConceptScore W2008093961C2779980429 @default.
• W2008093961 hasConceptScore W2008093961C2780714102 @default.
• W2008093961 hasConceptScore W2008093961C2780757906 @default.
• W2008093961 hasConceptScore W2008093961C2781355080 @default.
• W2008093961 hasConceptScore W2008093961C33923547 @default.
• W2008093961 hasConceptScore W2008093961C71924100 @default.
• W2008093961 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W2008093961 hasLocation W20080939611 @default.
• W2008093961 hasOpenAccess W2008093961 @default.
• W2008093961 hasPrimaryLocation W20080939611 @default.
• W2008093961 hasRelatedWork W1996224832 @default.
• W2008093961 hasRelatedWork W2011271617 @default.
• W2008093961 hasRelatedWork W2076083637 @default.
• W2008093961 hasRelatedWork W2077453556 @default.
• W2008093961 hasRelatedWork W2094017040 @default.
• W2008093961 hasRelatedWork W2412643637 @default.
• W2008093961 hasRelatedWork W3166282989 @default.
• W2008093961 hasRelatedWork W3202991064 @default.
• W2008093961 hasRelatedWork W4291288523 @default.
• W2008093961 hasRelatedWork W4362520545 @default.
• W2008093961 hasVolume "99" @default.
• W2008093961 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2008093961 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2008093961 magId "2008093961" @default.
• W2008093961 workType "article" @default.