FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2008109004> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2008109004 endingPage "320" @default.
• W2008109004 startingPage "299" @default.
• W2008109004 abstract "In this study, we explore the frequency, timing, and impact of a particular form of conflict management—namely, mediation—and we do so in the dangerous context of international militarized rivalries over the period 1816–1992. We wish to explore how often does mediation actually occur in the context of enduring rivalries and understand at what phase mediation efforts are undertaken (if indeed they are made at all). Are mediation efforts only made in the most severe rivalries, or are they attempted in rivalries before they become enduring? At what stage in the rivalry is mediation attempted, and how does this fit in with the prescriptions derived from the extensive literature on timing and mediation success? Beyond a description of mediation in the context of rivalries, we wish to assess its impact on the short‐term dynamics of rivalries. Do mediation efforts make a difference? Do they help to postpone the onset of violence, lessen conflict severity, or prevent a war? The results indicated that enduring rivalries experience more mediation efforts than other conflicts. Compared to other less intense rivalries, enduring ones were up to ten times more likely to involve a third party (more than a majority of enduring rivalries actually had at least one mediation effort), and the average number of mediation attempts was significantly greater in the enduring rivalry context. Contrary to some prescriptions, we did not find mediation efforts to occur necessarily later in rivalries; mediations generally occurred at various stages of the rivalry process, regardless of whether it was a isolated, proto, or enduring rivalry. Overall, we found mediation attempts to have relatively little impact on the behavior of states in rivalries. They did not apparently influence the likelihood of subsequent war between rivals nor the level of severity for conflict that fell short of the war threshold. The most notable effects of mediation were found in their relationship to dispute “waiting times” or the interval from one dispute to the next. We found that positive mediation outcomes could, in some rivalries, lead to a delay in the onset of new militarized conflict, but the effect was modest. As anticipated, mediation attempts occurring in the latter stages of a rivalry did increase waiting times, but we judge this relationship to be spurious given the basic trend in rivalries toward greater time between disputes as rivalries mature." @default.
• W2008109004 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2008109004 creator A5030643420 @default.
• W2008109004 creator A5067882258 @default.
• W2008109004 date "1997-04-01" @default.
• W2008109004 modified "2023-10-11" @default.
• W2008109004 title "Conflict management of enduring rivalries: The frequency, timing, and short‐term impact of mediation" @default.
• W2008109004 cites W1982501755 @default.
• W2008109004 cites W1987637276 @default.
• W2008109004 cites W2017472428 @default.
• W2008109004 cites W2025583209 @default.
• W2008109004 cites W2041212929 @default.
• W2008109004 cites W2049209394 @default.
• W2008109004 cites W2066512039 @default.
• W2008109004 cites W2071619935 @default.
• W2008109004 cites W2072022134 @default.
• W2008109004 cites W2080060564 @default.
• W2008109004 cites W2087273900 @default.
• W2008109004 cites W2087313224 @default.
• W2008109004 cites W2090507479 @default.
• W2008109004 cites W2095259547 @default.
• W2008109004 cites W2097744179 @default.
• W2008109004 cites W2105825936 @default.
• W2008109004 cites W2128786629 @default.
• W2008109004 cites W2147473478 @default.
• W2008109004 cites W2164166443 @default.
• W2008109004 cites W2327409159 @default.
• W2008109004 cites W4212923076 @default.
• W2008109004 cites W4214518271 @default.
• W2008109004 cites W4255570421 @default.
• W2008109004 cites W611752991 @default.
• W2008109004 doi "https://doi.org/10.1080/03050629708434895" @default.
• W2008109004 hasPublicationYear "1997" @default.
• W2008109004 type Work @default.
• W2008109004 sameAs 2008109004 @default.
• W2008109004 citedByCount "62" @default.
• W2008109004 countsByYear W20081090042012 @default.
• W2008109004 countsByYear W20081090042013 @default.
• W2008109004 countsByYear W20081090042014 @default.
• W2008109004 countsByYear W20081090042015 @default.
• W2008109004 countsByYear W20081090042016 @default.
• W2008109004 countsByYear W20081090042018 @default.
• W2008109004 countsByYear W20081090042019 @default.
• W2008109004 countsByYear W20081090042021 @default.
• W2008109004 countsByYear W20081090042023 @default.
• W2008109004 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2008109004 hasAuthorship W2008109004A5030643420 @default.
• W2008109004 hasAuthorship W2008109004A5067882258 @default.
• W2008109004 hasConcept C107365899 @default.
• W2008109004 hasConcept C138921699 @default.
• W2008109004 hasConcept C139719470 @default.
• W2008109004 hasConcept C139997747 @default.
• W2008109004 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2008109004 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2008109004 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2008109004 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W2008109004 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2008109004 hasConcept C179420905 @default.
• W2008109004 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2008109004 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W2008109004 hasConcept C2779602485 @default.
• W2008109004 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2008109004 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W2008109004 hasConceptScore W2008109004C107365899 @default.
• W2008109004 hasConceptScore W2008109004C138921699 @default.
• W2008109004 hasConceptScore W2008109004C139719470 @default.
• W2008109004 hasConceptScore W2008109004C139997747 @default.
• W2008109004 hasConceptScore W2008109004C144024400 @default.
• W2008109004 hasConceptScore W2008109004C15744967 @default.
• W2008109004 hasConceptScore W2008109004C162324750 @default.
• W2008109004 hasConceptScore W2008109004C166957645 @default.
• W2008109004 hasConceptScore W2008109004C17744445 @default.
• W2008109004 hasConceptScore W2008109004C179420905 @default.
• W2008109004 hasConceptScore W2008109004C199539241 @default.
• W2008109004 hasConceptScore W2008109004C2779343474 @default.
• W2008109004 hasConceptScore W2008109004C2779602485 @default.
• W2008109004 hasConceptScore W2008109004C77805123 @default.
• W2008109004 hasConceptScore W2008109004C95457728 @default.
• W2008109004 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2008109004 hasLocation W20081090041 @default.
• W2008109004 hasOpenAccess W2008109004 @default.
• W2008109004 hasPrimaryLocation W20081090041 @default.
• W2008109004 hasRelatedWork W1015502445 @default.
• W2008109004 hasRelatedWork W1500177978 @default.
• W2008109004 hasRelatedWork W2024401412 @default.
• W2008109004 hasRelatedWork W2126704270 @default.
• W2008109004 hasRelatedWork W2135893568 @default.
• W2008109004 hasRelatedWork W2268905238 @default.
• W2008109004 hasRelatedWork W2370027154 @default.
• W2008109004 hasRelatedWork W2604430852 @default.
• W2008109004 hasRelatedWork W3012232265 @default.
• W2008109004 hasRelatedWork W3016169455 @default.
• W2008109004 hasVolume "22" @default.
• W2008109004 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2008109004 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2008109004 magId "2008109004" @default.
• W2008109004 workType "article" @default.