Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2008221745> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 85 of
85
with 100 items per page.
- W2008221745 endingPage "95" @default.
- W2008221745 startingPage "92" @default.
- W2008221745 abstract "Patients with a diagnosis of breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) have a low risk of developing axillary metastases. The use of sentinel node biopsy in this group of patients is controversial. The objective of this study is to determine if the sentinel node biopsy benefits a subgroup of patients with DCIS. Between April 2002 and December 2007, patients with a diagnosis of DCIS and who underwent a sentinel node biopsy were included in the study. In our centre the sentinel node biopsy was performed in patients with DCIS who required a mastectomy, high grade and >2 cm DCIS, and palpable DCIS. Forty-seven patients were included in the study. In all cases the sentinel node was identified. Twenty-five (53.1%) patients underwent a mastectomy due to extensive DCIS; 14 of these (56%) with immediate reconstruction with implants. Twenty-five (53.1%) patients had high grade DCIS. In 7 (14.8%) patients the tumour was palpable. Fourteen patients (29.7%) were upgraded to invasive breast cancer in the definitive histology. In 2 (4.2%) patients who underwent a mastectomy a positive sentinel node was found. Performing sentinel node biopsy in this group of DCIS patients has lead us to identify 4% of patients with positive sentinel nodes. Furthermore, 29.7% of the patients have avoided a second invasive diagnostic procedure for definitive histology. For these reasons we consider it appropiate to perform sentinel node biopsy in this subgroup of patients with DCIS of the breas Las pacientes con carcinoma ductal in situ (CDIS) de la mama tienen un riesgo de metástasis ganglionares bajo. Las indicaciones de la utilización del ganglio centinela en el CDIS son controvertidas. El objetivo de este estudio es determinar si la biopsia del ganglio centinela beneficia a un grupo determinado de pacientes con CDIS. Se ha incluido a las pacientes diagnosticadas de CDIS y con biopsia del ganglio centinela entre abril de 2002 y diciembre de 2007. En nuestro servicio, el protocolo para realizar ganglio centinela en CDIS ha sido CDIS extenso que requiera mastectomía, de alto grado y tamaño >2 cm, y los CDIS que se acompañan de tumor palpable. Se incluyó a 47 pacientes. Se identificó el ganglio centinela en todos los casos. En 25 (53%) pacientes se realizó una mastectomía por CDIS extenso, y en 14 (56%) de estas pacientes se realizó reconstrucción inmediata. En 25 (53%) pacientes el CDIS fue de grado histológico alto (III). En 7 pacientes la lesión fue palpable. En el diagnóstico histopatológico final se observó que en 14 (29%) pacientes apareció carcinoma invasivo en el diagnóstico definitivo. En 2 (4%) pacientes con mastectomía se encontró un ganglio centinela positivo. Las indicaciones seguidas en el protocolo permiten identificar un 4% de ganglios centinelas positivos. Además, en el 29% de las pacientes cuya anatomía patológica definitiva muestra invasión se evita una segunda intervención quirúrgica. Por todo ello, creemos recomendable la realización de la biopsia del ganglio centinela en estos casos determinados de CDIS." @default.
- W2008221745 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2008221745 creator A5036020728 @default.
- W2008221745 creator A5036524291 @default.
- W2008221745 creator A5037023029 @default.
- W2008221745 creator A5072218413 @default.
- W2008221745 date "2009-01-01" @default.
- W2008221745 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
- W2008221745 title "Benefit of sentinel node biopsy in patients with breast ductal carcinoma in situ" @default.
- W2008221745 cites W1592142216 @default.
- W2008221745 cites W1976369656 @default.
- W2008221745 cites W1991444882 @default.
- W2008221745 cites W2008107662 @default.
- W2008221745 cites W2010000042 @default.
- W2008221745 cites W2016344361 @default.
- W2008221745 cites W2033991697 @default.
- W2008221745 cites W2035689538 @default.
- W2008221745 cites W2053060765 @default.
- W2008221745 cites W2067385982 @default.
- W2008221745 cites W2084463689 @default.
- W2008221745 cites W2112516937 @default.
- W2008221745 cites W2130614397 @default.
- W2008221745 cites W2131919039 @default.
- W2008221745 cites W2134313942 @default.
- W2008221745 cites W2146821731 @default.
- W2008221745 cites W2153949680 @default.
- W2008221745 cites W2331142721 @default.
- W2008221745 cites W4313020317 @default.
- W2008221745 cites W4375905852 @default.
- W2008221745 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s2173-5077(09)70121-8" @default.
- W2008221745 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19231464" @default.
- W2008221745 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
- W2008221745 type Work @default.
- W2008221745 sameAs 2008221745 @default.
- W2008221745 citedByCount "2" @default.
- W2008221745 countsByYear W20082217452014 @default.
- W2008221745 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2008221745 hasAuthorship W2008221745A5036020728 @default.
- W2008221745 hasAuthorship W2008221745A5036524291 @default.
- W2008221745 hasAuthorship W2008221745A5037023029 @default.
- W2008221745 hasAuthorship W2008221745A5072218413 @default.
- W2008221745 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
- W2008221745 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2008221745 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
- W2008221745 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W2008221745 hasConcept C179671157 @default.
- W2008221745 hasConcept C2775934546 @default.
- W2008221745 hasConcept C2777757722 @default.
- W2008221745 hasConcept C2780212769 @default.
- W2008221745 hasConcept C2780862961 @default.
- W2008221745 hasConcept C530470458 @default.
- W2008221745 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2008221745 hasConceptScore W2008221745C121608353 @default.
- W2008221745 hasConceptScore W2008221745C126322002 @default.
- W2008221745 hasConceptScore W2008221745C126838900 @default.
- W2008221745 hasConceptScore W2008221745C141071460 @default.
- W2008221745 hasConceptScore W2008221745C179671157 @default.
- W2008221745 hasConceptScore W2008221745C2775934546 @default.
- W2008221745 hasConceptScore W2008221745C2777757722 @default.
- W2008221745 hasConceptScore W2008221745C2780212769 @default.
- W2008221745 hasConceptScore W2008221745C2780862961 @default.
- W2008221745 hasConceptScore W2008221745C530470458 @default.
- W2008221745 hasConceptScore W2008221745C71924100 @default.
- W2008221745 hasIssue "2" @default.
- W2008221745 hasLocation W20082217451 @default.
- W2008221745 hasLocation W20082217452 @default.
- W2008221745 hasOpenAccess W2008221745 @default.
- W2008221745 hasPrimaryLocation W20082217451 @default.
- W2008221745 hasRelatedWork W1964740086 @default.
- W2008221745 hasRelatedWork W2008221745 @default.
- W2008221745 hasRelatedWork W2098252844 @default.
- W2008221745 hasRelatedWork W2134313942 @default.
- W2008221745 hasRelatedWork W2332536518 @default.
- W2008221745 hasRelatedWork W2588247292 @default.
- W2008221745 hasRelatedWork W3030610217 @default.
- W2008221745 hasRelatedWork W3092157217 @default.
- W2008221745 hasRelatedWork W3194392362 @default.
- W2008221745 hasRelatedWork W4225586434 @default.
- W2008221745 hasVolume "85" @default.
- W2008221745 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2008221745 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2008221745 magId "2008221745" @default.
- W2008221745 workType "article" @default.