FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2008313902> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2008313902 endingPage "449" @default.
• W2008313902 startingPage "440" @default.
• W2008313902 abstract "ObjectiveTo compare growth rates of ovarian follicles during natural menstrual cycles, oral contraception (OC) cycles, and ovarian stimulation cycles using standardized techniques.DesignProspective, comparative, observational, longitudinal study.SettingHealthy volunteers in research trials and infertility patients undergoing treatment at an academic institution.Patient(s)Women were evaluated during natural cycles (n = 50), OC cycles (n = 71), and ovarian stimulation cycles (n = 131).Intervention(s)Serial transvaginal ultrasonography was performed to measure follicle diameter. Day-to-day growth and regression profiles of individual follicles were determined. Mean growth rates were calculated for ovulatory follicles. Mean growth and regression rates were calculated for anovulatory follicles.Main Outcome Measure(s)Follicle growth rate (in millimeters per day).Result(s)Mean follicular growth rate was greater during ovarian stimulation cycles (1.69 ± 0.03 mm/day) compared to natural (1.42 ± 0.05 mm/day) and OC cycles (1.36 ± 0.08 mm/day). The interval from dominant follicle selection to ovulation was shorter during stimulation cycles (5.08 ± 0.07 days) compared to natural cycles (7.16 ± 0.23 days).Conclusion(s)Follicles grew faster during ovarian stimulation therapy compared to natural cycles or OC cycles. Greater follicular growth rates in stimulation cycles were associated with shorter intervals from selection to ovulation. The biologic effects of increased follicular growth rates and shorter intervals to ovulation on oocyte competence in women undergoing assisted reproduction remain to be determined. To compare growth rates of ovarian follicles during natural menstrual cycles, oral contraception (OC) cycles, and ovarian stimulation cycles using standardized techniques. Prospective, comparative, observational, longitudinal study. Healthy volunteers in research trials and infertility patients undergoing treatment at an academic institution. Women were evaluated during natural cycles (n = 50), OC cycles (n = 71), and ovarian stimulation cycles (n = 131). Serial transvaginal ultrasonography was performed to measure follicle diameter. Day-to-day growth and regression profiles of individual follicles were determined. Mean growth rates were calculated for ovulatory follicles. Mean growth and regression rates were calculated for anovulatory follicles. Follicle growth rate (in millimeters per day). Mean follicular growth rate was greater during ovarian stimulation cycles (1.69 ± 0.03 mm/day) compared to natural (1.42 ± 0.05 mm/day) and OC cycles (1.36 ± 0.08 mm/day). The interval from dominant follicle selection to ovulation was shorter during stimulation cycles (5.08 ± 0.07 days) compared to natural cycles (7.16 ± 0.23 days). Follicles grew faster during ovarian stimulation therapy compared to natural cycles or OC cycles. Greater follicular growth rates in stimulation cycles were associated with shorter intervals from selection to ovulation. The biologic effects of increased follicular growth rates and shorter intervals to ovulation on oocyte competence in women undergoing assisted reproduction remain to be determined." @default.
• W2008313902 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2008313902 creator A5004064326 @default.
• W2008313902 creator A5073680036 @default.
• W2008313902 creator A5091911037 @default.
• W2008313902 date "2009-02-01" @default.
• W2008313902 modified "2023-09-29" @default.
• W2008313902 title "Growth rates of ovarian follicles during natural menstrual cycles, oral contraception cycles, and ovarian stimulation cycles" @default.
• W2008313902 cites W1568006496 @default.
• W2008313902 cites W1973952798 @default.
• W2008313902 cites W1976401964 @default.
• W2008313902 cites W1984454274 @default.
• W2008313902 cites W1989115647 @default.
• W2008313902 cites W1990909679 @default.
• W2008313902 cites W1996469421 @default.
• W2008313902 cites W2001174620 @default.
• W2008313902 cites W2006472869 @default.
• W2008313902 cites W2013029765 @default.
• W2008313902 cites W2013639415 @default.
• W2008313902 cites W2014221260 @default.
• W2008313902 cites W202062953 @default.
• W2008313902 cites W2021364912 @default.
• W2008313902 cites W2036173352 @default.
• W2008313902 cites W2038937094 @default.
• W2008313902 cites W2045467050 @default.
• W2008313902 cites W2045468188 @default.
• W2008313902 cites W2046724886 @default.
• W2008313902 cites W2050322437 @default.
• W2008313902 cites W2050867024 @default.
• W2008313902 cites W2052207542 @default.
• W2008313902 cites W2056751724 @default.
• W2008313902 cites W2057356979 @default.
• W2008313902 cites W2067249017 @default.
• W2008313902 cites W2067885280 @default.
• W2008313902 cites W2068709817 @default.
• W2008313902 cites W2075825095 @default.
• W2008313902 cites W2093929682 @default.
• W2008313902 cites W2111889428 @default.
• W2008313902 cites W2116114174 @default.
• W2008313902 cites W2122959529 @default.
• W2008313902 cites W2151787333 @default.
• W2008313902 cites W2158632151 @default.
• W2008313902 cites W2201444619 @default.
• W2008313902 cites W2287931800 @default.
• W2008313902 cites W2293048013 @default.
• W2008313902 cites W2326015253 @default.
• W2008313902 cites W2337719539 @default.
• W2008313902 cites W23492800 @default.
• W2008313902 cites W2396990272 @default.
• W2008313902 cites W2398295129 @default.
• W2008313902 cites W2402692497 @default.
• W2008313902 cites W2403639355 @default.
• W2008313902 cites W2404227013 @default.
• W2008313902 cites W2412868335 @default.
• W2008313902 cites W2415481004 @default.
• W2008313902 cites W2417512786 @default.
• W2008313902 cites W2417771582 @default.
• W2008313902 cites W2461811045 @default.
• W2008313902 cites W2461824064 @default.
• W2008313902 cites W66918757 @default.
• W2008313902 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.11.054" @default.
• W2008313902 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18249401" @default.
• W2008313902 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
• W2008313902 type Work @default.
• W2008313902 sameAs 2008313902 @default.
• W2008313902 citedByCount "59" @default.
• W2008313902 countsByYear W20083139022012 @default.
• W2008313902 countsByYear W20083139022013 @default.
• W2008313902 countsByYear W20083139022014 @default.
• W2008313902 countsByYear W20083139022015 @default.
• W2008313902 countsByYear W20083139022016 @default.
• W2008313902 countsByYear W20083139022017 @default.
• W2008313902 countsByYear W20083139022018 @default.
• W2008313902 countsByYear W20083139022019 @default.
• W2008313902 countsByYear W20083139022020 @default.
• W2008313902 countsByYear W20083139022021 @default.
• W2008313902 countsByYear W20083139022022 @default.
• W2008313902 countsByYear W20083139022023 @default.
• W2008313902 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2008313902 hasAuthorship W2008313902A5004064326 @default.
• W2008313902 hasAuthorship W2008313902A5073680036 @default.
• W2008313902 hasAuthorship W2008313902A5091911037 @default.
• W2008313902 hasBestOaLocation W20083139021 @default.
• W2008313902 hasConcept C102570824 @default.
• W2008313902 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2008313902 hasConcept C134018914 @default.
• W2008313902 hasConcept C187785154 @default.
• W2008313902 hasConcept C24998067 @default.
• W2008313902 hasConcept C2777688143 @default.
• W2008313902 hasConcept C2777702977 @default.
• W2008313902 hasConcept C2779058012 @default.
• W2008313902 hasConcept C2779234561 @default.
• W2008313902 hasConcept C2780536345 @default.
• W2008313902 hasConcept C2781230225 @default.
• W2008313902 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W2008313902 hasConcept C71315377 @default.
• W2008313902 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2008313902 hasConcept C86803240 @default.

• next