FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2008378375> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2008378375 endingPage "11692" @default.
• W2008378375 startingPage "11687" @default.
• W2008378375 abstract "Currents through the human skeletal muscle chloride channel hClC-1 can be blocked by external application of 1 mm Zn2+ or the histidine-reactive compound diethyl pyrocarbonate (DEPC). The current block by Zn2+ strongly depends on the external pH (pK a near 6.9), whereas the block by DEPC is rather independent of the pH in the range of 5.5 to 8.5. To identify the target sites of these reagents, we constructed a total of twelve cysteine- and/or histidine-replacement mutants, transfected tsA201 cells with them, and investigated the resulting whole-cell chloride currents. The majority of the mutants exhibited a similar sensitivity toward Zn2+ or DEPC as wild type (WT) channels. Block by 1 mm Zn2+ was nearly absent only with the mutant C546A. Four mutants (C242A, C254A, H180A, and H451A) were slightly less sensitive to Zn2+ than WT. Tests with double, triple, and quadruple mutants yielded that, in addition to C546, C242 and C254 are also most likely participating in Zn2+-binding. Currents through the human skeletal muscle chloride channel hClC-1 can be blocked by external application of 1 mm Zn2+ or the histidine-reactive compound diethyl pyrocarbonate (DEPC). The current block by Zn2+ strongly depends on the external pH (pK a near 6.9), whereas the block by DEPC is rather independent of the pH in the range of 5.5 to 8.5. To identify the target sites of these reagents, we constructed a total of twelve cysteine- and/or histidine-replacement mutants, transfected tsA201 cells with them, and investigated the resulting whole-cell chloride currents. The majority of the mutants exhibited a similar sensitivity toward Zn2+ or DEPC as wild type (WT) channels. Block by 1 mm Zn2+ was nearly absent only with the mutant C546A. Four mutants (C242A, C254A, H180A, and H451A) were slightly less sensitive to Zn2+ than WT. Tests with double, triple, and quadruple mutants yielded that, in addition to C546, C242 and C254 are also most likely participating in Zn2+-binding. chloride channel of human skeletal muscle diethyl pyrocarbonate wild type (3-[1, 1-dimethyl-2-hydroxyethyl)amino]-2-hydroxypropane-sulfonic acid 2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid The main chloride channel of human skeletal muscle, hClC-1,1 is a member of the ClC chloride channel family that is unrelated to any other known ion channels (1Jentsch T.J. Günther W. Bioessays. 1997; 19: 117-126Crossref PubMed Scopus (168) Google Scholar). The first membrane topology model of ClC proteins was derived from hydropathy analysis (2Jentsch T.J. Steinmeyer K. Schwarz G. Nature. 1990; 348: 510-514Crossref PubMed Scopus (421) Google Scholar); several times it had to be revised on the grounds of firmer experimental evidence (3Kieferle S. Fong P. Bens M. Vandewalle A. Jentsch T.J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1994; 91: 6943-6947Crossref PubMed Scopus (242) Google Scholar, 4Middleton R.E. Pheasant D.J. Miller C. Biochemistry. 1994; 33: 13189-13198Crossref PubMed Scopus (115) Google Scholar, 5Schmidt-Rose T. Jentsch T.J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1997; 94: 7633-7638Crossref PubMed Scopus (101) Google Scholar). Certain mutations in the human ClC-1 gene (reviewed in Ref. 6Lehmann-Horn F. Rüdel R. Rev. Physiol. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1996; 128: 195-268Crossref PubMed Scopus (77) Google Scholar) lead to myotonia, a disease characterized by muscle stiffness. The study of such myotonia-causing mutations provided first insights into the relationships between the primary sequence and the functions of this channel (7Fahlke Ch. Rüdel R. Mitrovic N. Zhou M. George Jr., A.L. Neuron. 1995; 15: 463-472Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (104) Google Scholar, 8Fahlke Ch. Beck C.L. George Jr., A.L. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1997; 94: 2729-2734Crossref PubMed Scopus (94) Google Scholar, 9Pusch M. Steinmeyer K. Koch M.C. Jentsch T.J. Neuron. 1995; 15: 1455-1463Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (174) Google Scholar, 10Wollnik B. Kubisch C. Steinmeyer K. Pusch M. Hum. Mol. Genet. 1997; 6: 805-811Crossref PubMed Scopus (63) Google Scholar). Strong evidence suggests regions between transmembrane segments D3 and the end of D5 to participate in the pore-forming structure (11Fahlke C. Yu H.T. Beck C.L. Rhodes T.H. George Jr., A.L. Nature. 1997; 390: 529-532Crossref PubMed Scopus (156) Google Scholar). However, these results are not in agreement with the most recently postulated topology model of ClC-1 (5Schmidt-Rose T. Jentsch T.J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1997; 94: 7633-7638Crossref PubMed Scopus (101) Google Scholar). Furthermore, studies of ClC-0 (reviewed in Ref. 1Jentsch T.J. Günther W. Bioessays. 1997; 19: 117-126Crossref PubMed Scopus (168) Google Scholar), a homologous chloride channel in the electric organ of Torpedo, led to the suggestion of additional protein parts being involved in forming the ion conducting pathway. ClC channels most likely consist of two subunits (12Fahlke Ch. Knittle T. Gurnett C.A. Campbell K.P. George Jr., A.L. J. Gen. Physiol. 1997; 109: 93-104Crossref PubMed Scopus (81) Google Scholar), and in the case of ClC-0, each subunit was proposed to contain a single pore (4Middleton R.E. Pheasant D.J. Miller C. Biochemistry. 1994; 33: 13189-13198Crossref PubMed Scopus (115) Google Scholar, 13Middleton R.E. Pheasant D.J. Miller C. Nature. 1996; 383: 337-340Crossref PubMed Scopus (221) Google Scholar,14Ludewig U. Pusch M. Jentsch T.J. Nature. 1996; 383: 340-343Crossref PubMed Scopus (247) Google Scholar). Recent evidence speaks against this “double-barreled” channel model, at least in the case of ClC-1 (15Fahlke C. Rhodes T.H. Desai R.R. George Jr., A.L. Nature. 1998; 394: 687-690Crossref PubMed Scopus (59) Google Scholar). We have found earlier that the exposure of hClC-1, stably expressed in HEK-293 cells, to 1 mm Zn2+ leads to a massive reduction of the conducted chloride current (16Kürz L.L. Wagner S. George Jr., A.L. Rüdel R. Pflügers Arch. 1997; 433: 357-363PubMed Google Scholar). The results were compatible with the presence of at least two extracellularly accessible zinc-binding sites and a direct effect on ion permeation,e.g. by obstruction of the pore. The histidyl-reactive diethyl pyrocarbonate (DEPC), applied from the outside, also reduced the currents through hClC-1. The aim of this study was to identify the target residues for these blockers and, thereby, to draw inferences regarding the membrane topology and the potential location of pore-forming structures. It is known from other proteins, that Zn2+ binding sites are often made up of several and possibly different amino acid side chains (17Tainer J.A. Roberts V.A. Getzoff E.D. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 1991; 2: 582-591Crossref PubMed Scopus (120) Google Scholar). Because these residues (histidine, cysteine, or acidic amino acids) can be distant on the primary sequence but close in space, we also hoped that their identification would provide us with the first three-dimensional information on the ClC-1 protein. Therefore, we individually replaced candidate cysteine and histidine residues with alanine, expressed the mutants in tsA201 cells, and characterized their sensitivity toward the blocking agents. Site-directed mutagenesis was performed using a polymerase chain reaction-based kit (QuikChange, Stratagene). Mutant constructs contained in the expression vector pRc/CMV were used for transfection of tsA201 cells as described (18Wagner S. Deymeer F. Kürz L.L. Benz S. Schleithoff L. Lehmann-Horn F. Serdaroglu P. Özdemir C. Rüdel R. Muscle Nerve. 1998; 21: 1122-1128Crossref PubMed Scopus (46) Google Scholar). Transient transfection was achieved using the calcium phosphate precipitation method (19Graham R.L. van der Eb A.J. Virology. 1973; 52: 456-467Crossref PubMed Scopus (6489) Google Scholar) with ∼0.01 μg of plasmid DNA per 3–5 × 103 cells/cm2. To detect cells expressing recombinant mutant clones after transfection, the tsA201 cells were co-transfected with a plasmid encoding the CD8 antigen and incubated with polystyrene microbeads coated with anti-CD8 antibody (Dynabeads M-450 CD8, Dynal GmbH, Hamburg, Germany) 3 min before electrophysiological characterization. Two to three days after transfection, standard whole-cell recordings were performed, using an EPC-7 amplifier (List, Darmstadt, Germany). Only cells to which microbeads had bound were used. For measurements of WT currents, a stably transfected HEK-293 cell line was used (16Kürz L.L. Wagner S. George Jr., A.L. Rüdel R. Pflügers Arch. 1997; 433: 357-363PubMed Google Scholar) or tsA201 cells were transiently transfected as described for the mutants. No differences were observed with these two types of cells regarding electrophysiological characteristics or blocker sensitivity. The standard external solution contained 140 mm NaCl, 4 mm KCl, 2 mm CaCl2, 1 mm MgCl2, 5 mm HEPES, pH 7.4. For variation of pH, HEPES was substituted on an equimolar basis with MES for pH 5.5–6.7 and with AMPSO for pH 8.0–8.5. The recording pipettes were pulled from borosilicate glass and were heat polished. They had resistances between 1.0 and 2.0 mΩ when filled with standard internal solution (130 mm CsCl, 2 mm MgCl2, 5 mm EGTA, 10 mm HEPES, pH 7.4). More than 60% of the series resistance was compensated for by an analog procedure. Linear leakage or capacitive currents were not subtracted. The currents were filtered using the 3-kHz filter of the amplifier and sampled at various rates. For recording and analysis of experimental data, a combination of three programs (pCLAMP, Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA; Excel, Microsoft, Unterschleissheim, Germany; SigmaPlot, Jandel Scientific, San Raphael, CA) was used. Differences of current reduction were tested for statistical significance (p < 0.05) using one-way analysis of variance followed by the Tukey-Kramer multiple comparisons test (GraphPad InStat, San Diego, CA). All data are shown as mean ± S.E. The pH-dependence as well as concentration dependences of Zn2+ block were fitted with logistic functions yielding estimates of IC50, pK a, and Hill coefficients. To determine the voltage dependence of activation, instantaneous tail current amplitudes at −105 mV were normalized to the extrapolated maximum value and plotted versus the test pulse potential, yielding the voltage dependence of the relative open probability,P open (16Kürz L.L. Wagner S. George Jr., A.L. Rüdel R. Pflügers Arch. 1997; 433: 357-363PubMed Google Scholar). The data were fitted with a single Boltzmann term plus a voltage-independent value:I(V) = A·(1 + exp[(V− V 0.5)/Kv])−1+ constant. ZnCl2 (Sigma Chemical Co., Deisenhofen, Germany) was prepared as a 100 mm stock solution in standard external solution and diluted prior to the experiments. All visible precipitates were eliminated by adding sufficient HCl; no pH change was noted after dilution. DEPC (Fluka, Buchs, Switzerland) was stored desiccated at 4 °C to minimize decomposition by hydrolysis. A 200-mM stock solution in absolute ethanol was freshly prepared every day, kept on ice, and diluted with standard external solution immediately before use. Stock solutions were added to the bath in the appropriate amounts, or else the cells were superfused with the indicated reagent solution. To study the pH dependence, the cells were exposed to bathing solutions of the desired pH, followed by application of the blocking agent. First we tested the effect of external pH on WT current block by external application of Zn2+ and DEPC. From the pK a and Hill coefficient of such titration curves, we hoped to infer the most likely sort and number of residues participating in the block. Changes of pH alone have profound effects on the gating of hClC-1, whereas outward current amplitudes do not change considerably (20Fahlke Ch. Rosenbohm A. Mitrovic N. George A.L.J. Rüdel R. Biophys. J. 1996; 71: 695-706Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (66) Google Scholar, 21Rychkov G.Y. Pusch M. Astill D.S. Roberts M.L. Jentsch T.J. Bretag A.H. J. Physiol. (Lond.). 1996; 497: 423-435Crossref Scopus (142) Google Scholar). Block of whole-cell currents was tested by applying repetitive pulses to +50 mV (for maximum channel activation), followed by a hyperpolarizing step at −125 mV to monitor the deactivation time course (Fig.1 A). Block by 1 mmZn2+ (registered at +50 mV) showed a strong pH dependence (Fig. 1 B). At pH 6.0, the current amplitudes were unaffected, whereas at pH 7.4, the block was almost complete. The apparent pK a of the resultant titration curve was 6.9, and the Hill coefficient was 3.0. In contrast, the effect of 1 mm DEPC was practically independent of pH over the range tested, pH 5.5–8.5. According to the topology model of Schmidt-Rose and Jentsch (Ref. 5Schmidt-Rose T. Jentsch T.J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1997; 94: 7633-7638Crossref PubMed Scopus (101) Google Scholar; see Fig.2 A), the cysteine residues at positions 242, 254, 271, 481, and 546, and the histidine residues at positions 237, 436, 451, 538, and 555 are potentially accessible from the extracellular environment. To test whether binding of Zn2+ to either of these residues is involved in the observed block, we individually replaced each of these residues by alanine. Positions Cys-179 and His-180 were included in this test because an alternative model placed D2 instead of D4 at the outside (Ref. 4Middleton R.E. Pheasant D.J. Miller C. Biochemistry. 1994; 33: 13189-13198Crossref PubMed Scopus (115) Google Scholar; not shown in figure). All mutants were functional when expressed in tsA201 cells, and the conducted whole-cell currents were not substantially different from WT currents. They were of similar amplitude and showed the typical deactivation in response to hyperpolarizing pulses as well as inward rectification (Fig. 3). In the case of the cysteine mutants C179A, C271A, and C481A, the amount of chloride current block exerted by 1 mm Zn2+ was very similar to that in WT (Fig.4 A). In contrast, block was almost absent with C546A (current reduction only by 17% instead of 83% in WT). Moderate changes (current reduction by 66–67%) were observed in the case of mutants C242A and C254A. These residues are located in segment D4 (see Fig. 2). The location of this segment is yet unclear, as evidence based on substituted cysteine accessibility suggests it to face (at least in part) the cytoplasm (11Fahlke C. Yu H.T. Beck C.L. Rhodes T.H. George Jr., A.L. Nature. 1997; 390: 529-532Crossref PubMed Scopus (156) Google Scholar), whereas topology studies predict it to be extracellular (5Schmidt-Rose T. Jentsch T.J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1997; 94: 7633-7638Crossref PubMed Scopus (101) Google Scholar). Furthermore, residues following the C-terminal end of D3 (designated P1) and in D5 have been identified to participate in the pore-forming structure (11Fahlke C. Yu H.T. Beck C.L. Rhodes T.H. George Jr., A.L. Nature. 1997; 390: 529-532Crossref PubMed Scopus (156) Google Scholar). To test further whether Zn2+ binds to Cys-242 and Cys-254, we constructed a double mutant (C242A/C254A) and investigated its susceptibility to Zn2+ blockade. In standard solutions the electrophysiological characteristics of the double mutant resembled that of WT (Fig. 3 B). In the presence of 1 mmZn2+, the chloride currents were only decreased by 33% (instead of 83% in WT), confirming the putative capabilities of these two cysteines to bind extracellularly applied Zn2+ and thereby establish channel blockade. When mutants H436A, H538A, and H555A were in the same way externally exposed to 1 mm Zn2+, reduction of current was about the same as with WT (Fig. 4 B). Currents through the mutants H180A and H451A were slightly less blocked by Zn2+(statistically significant) and, interestingly, in the case of H237A, Zn2+ was able to block the chloride currents even by 6% more than in WT. Also, the time course of block was markedly faster in this case (data not shown). To test for a possible role of His-180 and His-451 in the blocking effect of Zn2+, we expressed the mutant H180A/H451A, and additionally C242A/C254A/H180A/H451A, to possibly destroy the binding site completely. The double histidine mutant showed a very similar sensitivity toward Zn2+ as the two corresponding single mutants (block by ∼70%), whereas for the quadruple mutant, it was about as much as with the double mutant C242A/C254A (block by ∼33%). This suggests that the two histidine residues are not involved in the blockade exerted by Zn2+. To further investigate the changes in Zn2+ block observed for C242A, C254A, and C546A, we measured current block of these three mutants at different Zn2+ concentrations. In addition, the double mutant C242A/C254A and the triple mutant C242A/C254A/C546A were also studied. The resulting curves are depicted in Fig.5. The different degrees of Zn2+ sensitivity already indicated by the values obtained for 1 mm Zn2+ was fully confirmed. Whereas for WT, an IC50 value close to 200 μm was obtained, it took ∼700–800 μm Zn2+ to produce half-maximal block of the single cysteine mutants C242A and C254A and ∼1200 μm for the corresponding double mutant. The IC50 value for C546A was even larger (∼1900 μm), and after removal of all three cysteines, a value fifty times that of WT was obtained (∼9200 μm). The Hill coefficient was around 2.6 for WT, and it ranged from 1.6 to 2.5 for the single and double mutants. In the case of the triple mutant, the value was reduced to 0.9. We also tested the responses of all histidine mutants to extracellularly applied 1 mm DEPC. This reagent preferably modifies histidine residues by covalent binding of the carbethoxy group to the unprotonated imidazole ring, although modification of other amino acids has been described (22Miles E.W. Methods Enzymol. 1977; 47: 431-442Crossref PubMed Scopus (812) Google Scholar). The chloride currents through H180A, H436A, and H451A were blocked by a similar degree as in cells containing WT channels (47%, Fig. 4 C). Block appeared stronger for mutants H237A, H538A, and H555A (63%, 63%, and 74%, respectively), but the difference was significant only for the latter residue. All 14 mutants that we have investigated were functional and showed electrophysiological characteristics resembling those of WT channels. Thus, we can presume that the structural integrity of the channel protein was preserved in each case. With mutants C242A, C254A, and C546A, the zinc block of the chloride current was smaller than with WT. This suggests that the three cysteines Cys-242, Cys-254, and Cys-546 are involved in the binding of Zn2+, creating this effect. This result is surprising in so far as the apparent pK a value of the Zn2+ titration curve (pK a = 6.9, Fig.1 B) suggests that a histidine side chain (pK a ≈ 6–7) rather than a cysteine (pK a ≈ 8–9 in proteins) is the relevant target site. Studies on the pH dependence of ClC-1 current block by Cd2+, another group IIb cation with behavior similar to that of Zn2+, yielded a pK a value of 6.8, i.e. nearly identical to ours (23Rychkov G.Y. Astill D.S. Bennetts B. Hughes B.P. Bretag A.H. Roberts M.L. J. Physiol. (Lond.). 1997; 501: 355-362Crossref Scopus (39) Google Scholar). The authors of that study suggested that histidine residues might be involved. On the other hand, considerable pK a shifts of titratable groups are not uncommon in proteins, e.g. in our case because of the presence of a positive charge close to the cysteine thiol. None of the investigated histidine mutants showed a decreased sensitivity toward the histidine-selective reagent DEPC. This could either mean that DEPC has its target site located at a different position or that it exerts its effect by some unspecific mechanism. The apparent lack of pH dependence of the DEPC effect does not allow one to distinguish between these two possibilities. Because the zinc blockade of WT channels can only be exerted by external application of the metal ion (16Kürz L.L. Wagner S. George Jr., A.L. Rüdel R. Pflügers Arch. 1997; 433: 357-363PubMed Google Scholar), cysteines 242, 254, and 546 must be accessible from the extracellular environment. The finding that the gating parameters were unchanged (16Kürz L.L. Wagner S. George Jr., A.L. Rüdel R. Pflügers Arch. 1997; 433: 357-363PubMed Google Scholar) also led us to assume that Zn2+ might exert its blockade by a direct effect on chloride permeation, e.g. by occlusion of the pore. Thus, the three cysteine residues are presumably located in or near the pore region of the channel. The degree of zinc block was markedly diminished in the case of C546A, and only moderately in the case of the other two mutants. Hence, Cys-546 might be closer to the pore than Cys-242 and Cys-254. The latter two cysteines certainly influence the passage of chloride through the pore when Zn2+ is bound because the double mutant C242A/C254A is clearly less sensitive toward Zn2+ as each of the single mutants alone. Cysteines 242 and 254 are located in the D4 segment, and the residues in and around this region have indeed been postulated to form the channel-lining structure (11Fahlke C. Yu H.T. Beck C.L. Rhodes T.H. George Jr., A.L. Nature. 1997; 390: 529-532Crossref PubMed Scopus (156) Google Scholar). However, when positions 237, 244, 265, and 267 were mutated to cysteines, they were only accessible to internally applied methanethiosulfonate reagents (11Fahlke C. Yu H.T. Beck C.L. Rhodes T.H. George Jr., A.L. Nature. 1997; 390: 529-532Crossref PubMed Scopus (156) Google Scholar). Therefore Fahlkeet al. (11Fahlke C. Yu H.T. Beck C.L. Rhodes T.H. George Jr., A.L. Nature. 1997; 390: 529-532Crossref PubMed Scopus (156) Google Scholar) suggested D4 to be located at the inside of the membrane (Fig. 2 B). In contrast, Schmidt-Rose and Jentsch (5Schmidt-Rose T. Jentsch T.J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1997; 94: 7633-7638Crossref PubMed Scopus (101) Google Scholar), using glycosylation scanning and protease protection assays, proposed D4 to be located on the extracellular side of the membrane. At first glance, our results seem to speak in favor of the latter model. In addition, the absence of a voltage dependence of the Zn2+ blockade (16Kürz L.L. Wagner S. George Jr., A.L. Rüdel R. Pflügers Arch. 1997; 433: 357-363PubMed Google Scholar) and the fact that the ClC-1 pore is forming an anion-selective channel lets the possibility of Zn2+ penetrating this channel seem unlikely. However, positively charged methanethiosulfonate reagents were able to reach cysteine residues within the putative pore (11Fahlke C. Yu H.T. Beck C.L. Rhodes T.H. George Jr., A.L. Nature. 1997; 390: 529-532Crossref PubMed Scopus (156) Google Scholar), and very recent findings imply binding sites for internally applied Cd2+ at some of these positions (15Fahlke C. Rhodes T.H. Desai R.R. George Jr., A.L. Nature. 1998; 394: 687-690Crossref PubMed Scopus (59) Google Scholar). Furthermore, work on the GABA receptor, a chloride channel which is also Zn2+-sensitive, led to the proposal that Zn2+ is gaining access to the anion channel lumen, possibly in the form of the complex (ZnCl)42− (24Wooltorton J.R. McDonald B.J. Moss S.J. Smart T.G. J. Physiol. (Lond.). 1997; 505: 633-640Crossref Scopus (74) Google Scholar). The conformation and orientation of the region between D3 and D5 might also be more complex,e.g. looping through the membrane, and thereby exposing parts of it to the outside and the inside. Thus, more experimental data are needed to unambiguously assign a certain topology to this area of the protein and to elucidate the pore-lining structure. Another intriguing observation is that Zn2+ block of H237A seemed to be stronger (and faster, data not shown) than in the case of WT, although the difference was not statistically significant. The histidine side chain at this position has been proposed to line the channel lumen (11Fahlke C. Yu H.T. Beck C.L. Rhodes T.H. George Jr., A.L. Nature. 1997; 390: 529-532Crossref PubMed Scopus (156) Google Scholar, 15Fahlke C. Rhodes T.H. Desai R.R. George Jr., A.L. Nature. 1998; 394: 687-690Crossref PubMed Scopus (59) Google Scholar). By substituting it with the smaller, uncharged alanine side chain, the access for Zn2+ toward its actual target sites (one or more of the three cysteines) nearby might be facilitated. The same argument could explain the somewhat stronger block of mutant H555A by DEPC (Fig. 4 C). The amount of block effected by Zn2+ in mutants H180A and H451A is similar to that in mutants C242A and C254A. This led us initially to think of a motif found in some zinc finger proteins: two histidine and two cysteine residues surrounding a Zn2+ ion in a tetrahedral arrangement (25Mackay J.P. Crossley M. Trends. Biochem. Sci. 1998; 23: 1-4Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (384) Google Scholar). After removal of one of the binding partners, Zn2+ might still be able to bind but with a lower affinity. The lack of any additional blocking influence of the two histidine mutants in the double mutant H180A/H451A and in the construct C242A/C254A/H180A/H451A, however, argues against their potential involvement in Zn2+ binding. The mutation producing the largest difference in Zn2+sensitivity was C546A. The proposed extracellular accessibility of residue Cys-546 is in agreement with results suggesting that position Leu-549 is also accessible from the exterior (5Schmidt-Rose T. Jentsch T.J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1997; 94: 7633-7638Crossref PubMed Scopus (101) Google Scholar). Furthermore, ClC-0 mutations situated before and at the end of D12 result in altered permeation properties, implying a possible participation of these regions in forming the channel-lining structure (5Schmidt-Rose T. Jentsch T.J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1997; 94: 7633-7638Crossref PubMed Scopus (101) Google Scholar, 26Ludewig U. Jentsch T.J. Pusch M. J. Physiol. (Lond.). 1997; 498: 691-702Crossref Scopus (57) Google Scholar). It is unclear yet whether Cys-242, Cys-254, and Cys-546 participate in the same binding site although the Hill coefficient (3.0) of the titration curve seems suggestive. The substitution of all three residues in the triple mutant C242A/C254A/C546A results in a channel which is almost insensitive to Zn2+ blockade. The Hill coefficient (∼0.9) implies a loss of cooperativity and the removal of one or more binding sites compared with WT (∼2.6). In light of the new evidence indicating that ClC-1 has a single pore (15Fahlke C. Rhodes T.H. Desai R.R. George Jr., A.L. Nature. 1998; 394: 687-690Crossref PubMed Scopus (59) Google Scholar), binding sites made up of corresponding cysteines from both subunits are also plausible. We thank M. Arnold, E. Fuchs, and T. Hiller for excellent technical assistance." @default.
• W2008378375 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2008378375 creator A5025211700 @default.
• W2008378375 creator A5033787694 @default.
• W2008378375 creator A5043237128 @default.
• W2008378375 creator A5045210310 @default.
• W2008378375 creator A5056009462 @default.
• W2008378375 creator A5069107862 @default.
• W2008378375 creator A5090105143 @default.
• W2008378375 date "1999-04-01" @default.
• W2008378375 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2008378375 title "Identification of Three Cysteines as Targets for the Zn2+ Blockade of the Human Skeletal Muscle Chloride Channel" @default.
• W2008378375 cites W1525245904 @default.
• W2008378375 cites W1592866051 @default.
• W2008378375 cites W1963546104 @default.
• W2008378375 cites W1965372133 @default.
• W2008378375 cites W1965484547 @default.
• W2008378375 cites W1966647232 @default.
• W2008378375 cites W1970004399 @default.
• W2008378375 cites W1990592293 @default.
• W2008378375 cites W2011416373 @default.
• W2008378375 cites W2012054900 @default.
• W2008378375 cites W2013275612 @default.
• W2008378375 cites W2016872644 @default.
• W2008378375 cites W2017972396 @default.
• W2008378375 cites W2028127482 @default.
• W2008378375 cites W2030604934 @default.
• W2008378375 cites W2052960620 @default.
• W2008378375 cites W2053726766 @default.
• W2008378375 cites W2070370023 @default.
• W2008378375 cites W2076881300 @default.
• W2008378375 cites W2106336974 @default.
• W2008378375 cites W2132344166 @default.
• W2008378375 cites W2142045692 @default.
• W2008378375 cites W2156880618 @default.
• W2008378375 cites W24392530 @default.
• W2008378375 cites W955725593 @default.
• W2008378375 doi "https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.274.17.11687" @default.
• W2008378375 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10206982" @default.
• W2008378375 hasPublicationYear "1999" @default.
• W2008378375 type Work @default.
• W2008378375 sameAs 2008378375 @default.
• W2008378375 citedByCount "28" @default.
• W2008378375 countsByYear W20083783752012 @default.
• W2008378375 countsByYear W20083783752015 @default.
• W2008378375 countsByYear W20083783752018 @default.
• W2008378375 countsByYear W20083783752022 @default.
• W2008378375 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2008378375 hasAuthorship W2008378375A5025211700 @default.
• W2008378375 hasAuthorship W2008378375A5033787694 @default.
• W2008378375 hasAuthorship W2008378375A5043237128 @default.
• W2008378375 hasAuthorship W2008378375A5045210310 @default.
• W2008378375 hasAuthorship W2008378375A5056009462 @default.
• W2008378375 hasAuthorship W2008378375A5069107862 @default.
• W2008378375 hasAuthorship W2008378375A5090105143 @default.
• W2008378375 hasBestOaLocation W20083783751 @default.
• W2008378375 hasConcept C116834253 @default.
• W2008378375 hasConcept C12554922 @default.
• W2008378375 hasConcept C127162648 @default.
• W2008378375 hasConcept C134018914 @default.
• W2008378375 hasConcept C145822097 @default.
• W2008378375 hasConcept C170493617 @default.
• W2008378375 hasConcept C178790620 @default.
• W2008378375 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2008378375 hasConcept C2778468042 @default.
• W2008378375 hasConcept C2778695967 @default.
• W2008378375 hasConcept C2779959927 @default.
• W2008378375 hasConcept C2993909470 @default.
• W2008378375 hasConcept C31258907 @default.
• W2008378375 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2008378375 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W2008378375 hasConcept C59822182 @default.
• W2008378375 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2008378375 hasConcept C98274493 @default.
• W2008378375 hasConceptScore W2008378375C116834253 @default.
• W2008378375 hasConceptScore W2008378375C12554922 @default.
• W2008378375 hasConceptScore W2008378375C127162648 @default.
• W2008378375 hasConceptScore W2008378375C134018914 @default.
• W2008378375 hasConceptScore W2008378375C145822097 @default.
• W2008378375 hasConceptScore W2008378375C170493617 @default.
• W2008378375 hasConceptScore W2008378375C178790620 @default.
• W2008378375 hasConceptScore W2008378375C185592680 @default.
• W2008378375 hasConceptScore W2008378375C2778468042 @default.
• W2008378375 hasConceptScore W2008378375C2778695967 @default.
• W2008378375 hasConceptScore W2008378375C2779959927 @default.
• W2008378375 hasConceptScore W2008378375C2993909470 @default.
• W2008378375 hasConceptScore W2008378375C31258907 @default.
• W2008378375 hasConceptScore W2008378375C41008148 @default.
• W2008378375 hasConceptScore W2008378375C55493867 @default.
• W2008378375 hasConceptScore W2008378375C59822182 @default.
• W2008378375 hasConceptScore W2008378375C86803240 @default.
• W2008378375 hasConceptScore W2008378375C98274493 @default.
• W2008378375 hasIssue "17" @default.
• W2008378375 hasLocation W20083783751 @default.
• W2008378375 hasOpenAccess W2008378375 @default.
• W2008378375 hasPrimaryLocation W20083783751 @default.
• W2008378375 hasRelatedWork W1507537143 @default.
• W2008378375 hasRelatedWork W1985819154 @default.

• next