FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2008517961> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2008517961 endingPage "274" @default.
• W2008517961 startingPage "267" @default.
• W2008517961 abstract "ABSTRACT This study investigated the number and type of chronic wounds actually treated by Dutch nursing home physicians (NHPs). It was also the goal to know how many of the treated chronic wounds they considered infected. The NHPs were asked to choose and rank their top five out of several provided criteria for chronic wound infection. After this, the ranking was compared with the choices an international multidisciplinary Delphi group of wound experts made in 2005. A cross‐sectional descriptive survey was conducted using the information from a self‐reported questionnaire in a representative sample of Dutch NHPs. About 361 NHPs (25%) were sent a questionnaire. Of the 361 physicians, 139 (38.5%) filled in and returned the questionnaire of which 121 were valid. Of the NHPs, 73.5% actually treated at least one chronic pressure ulcers (PU), whereas 26.5% did not treat any. All NHPs treated three or less chronic post‐surgical wounds, whereas 68.4% treated none. Chronic venous leg ulcers, arterial ulcers and diabetic ulcers scored infrequently and less than the other two sorts of chronic wounds. Of the Dutch NHPs, 53% considered that none of the PU infected. The other chronic wounds were judged far less frequently to be infected. Dutch NHPs appeared to use more ‘traditional’ criteria such as ‘puss/abscess' and ‘malodour’ to identify infection and did not change their criteria by wound type. According to this study, NHPs do not frequently see many chronic wounds. The most frequent type of wounds treated was PU. For NHPs, the identification of infection of all types of chronic wounds is difficult. The use of criteria that is not in line with consensus documents may lead to ineffective treatment and even seriously damage patients: the clinical identification of infection is still dependent on experts' opinion. Further research on triggers for the suspicion of wound infection and the development of an evidence‐based guideline is necessary." @default.
• W2008517961 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2008517961 creator A5034886455 @default.
• W2008517961 creator A5071645091 @default.
• W2008517961 creator A5076080691 @default.
• W2008517961 creator A5083594119 @default.
• W2008517961 date "2009-08-01" @default.
• W2008517961 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2008517961 title "Definition of infection in chronic wounds by Dutch nursing home physicians" @default.
• W2008517961 cites W1590263970 @default.
• W2008517961 cites W1970955409 @default.
• W2008517961 cites W2006658297 @default.
• W2008517961 cites W2022319036 @default.
• W2008517961 cites W2029791186 @default.
• W2008517961 cites W2041399429 @default.
• W2008517961 cites W2044388424 @default.
• W2008517961 cites W2045593940 @default.
• W2008517961 cites W2048602281 @default.
• W2008517961 cites W2051000357 @default.
• W2008517961 cites W2128899119 @default.
• W2008517961 cites W2132993390 @default.
• W2008517961 cites W2417880793 @default.
• W2008517961 cites W4237598340 @default.
• W2008517961 cites W4240493472 @default.
• W2008517961 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-481x.2009.00604.x" @default.
• W2008517961 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/7951745" @default.
• W2008517961 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19719523" @default.
• W2008517961 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
• W2008517961 type Work @default.
• W2008517961 sameAs 2008517961 @default.
• W2008517961 citedByCount "17" @default.
• W2008517961 countsByYear W20085179612012 @default.
• W2008517961 countsByYear W20085179612013 @default.
• W2008517961 countsByYear W20085179612014 @default.
• W2008517961 countsByYear W20085179612015 @default.
• W2008517961 countsByYear W20085179612016 @default.
• W2008517961 countsByYear W20085179612017 @default.
• W2008517961 countsByYear W20085179612019 @default.
• W2008517961 countsByYear W20085179612021 @default.
• W2008517961 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2008517961 hasAuthorship W2008517961A5034886455 @default.
• W2008517961 hasAuthorship W2008517961A5071645091 @default.
• W2008517961 hasAuthorship W2008517961A5076080691 @default.
• W2008517961 hasAuthorship W2008517961A5083594119 @default.
• W2008517961 hasBestOaLocation W20085179612 @default.
• W2008517961 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2008517961 hasConcept C2780269544 @default.
• W2008517961 hasConcept C2781051411 @default.
• W2008517961 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2008517961 hasConceptScore W2008517961C141071460 @default.
• W2008517961 hasConceptScore W2008517961C2780269544 @default.
• W2008517961 hasConceptScore W2008517961C2781051411 @default.
• W2008517961 hasConceptScore W2008517961C71924100 @default.
• W2008517961 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2008517961 hasLocation W20085179611 @default.
• W2008517961 hasLocation W20085179612 @default.
• W2008517961 hasLocation W20085179613 @default.
• W2008517961 hasOpenAccess W2008517961 @default.
• W2008517961 hasPrimaryLocation W20085179611 @default.
• W2008517961 hasRelatedWork W1506200166 @default.
• W2008517961 hasRelatedWork W1995515455 @default.
• W2008517961 hasRelatedWork W2048182022 @default.
• W2008517961 hasRelatedWork W2080531066 @default.
• W2008517961 hasRelatedWork W2604872355 @default.
• W2008517961 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2008517961 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2008517961 hasRelatedWork W3031052312 @default.
• W2008517961 hasRelatedWork W3032375762 @default.
• W2008517961 hasRelatedWork W3108674512 @default.
• W2008517961 hasVolume "6" @default.
• W2008517961 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2008517961 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2008517961 magId "2008517961" @default.
• W2008517961 workType "article" @default.