FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2008740098> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2008740098 endingPage "195" @default.
• W2008740098 startingPage "181" @default.
• W2008740098 abstract "Research ArticlesThe Relative Contribution of Content and Context Factors on the Interpretation of ConditionalsKristien Dieussaert, Walter Schaeken, and Géry d’YdewalleKristien Dieussaert University of Leuven, Belgium Search for more papers by this author, Walter Schaeken University of Leuven, Belgium Search for more papers by this author, and Géry d’Ydewalle University of Leuven, Belgium Search for more papers by this authorPublished Online:April 15, 2015https://doi.org/10.1026//1618-3169.49.3.181PDFView Full Text ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInReddit SectionsMoreAbstractAbstract. Previous research showed that conditional reasoning is affected by the content and the context of the studied problems. In this study, we investigate in detail the relative effect of three factors, namely the number of alternative or disabling reasons, speaker control, and pragmatic type, on the interpretation of conditionals. These factors were subject to prior research, but mostly in a fragmented way. This study indicates that some important nuances must be added to earlier findings. The number of alternatives and disablers, the speaker control, and the pragmatic type of conditional statements all have a considerable effect on how we interpret these sentences and reason with them, but they do not have equal weight. Alternatives/disablers play a significant but very limited role on the interpretation of conditionals, while the influence of speaker control and of pragmatic type is far more imperative.ReferencesChan, D., Chua, F.(1994). Suppression of valid inferences: Syntactic views, mental models, and relative salience. Cognition, 53, 217– 238 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google ScholarCummins, D. D.(1995). Naive theories and causal deduction. Memory and Cognition, 23, 646– 658 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google ScholarCummins, D. D., Lubart, T, Alskins, O., Rist, R.(1991). Conditional reasoning and causation. Memory and Cognition, 19(3), 274– 282 First citation in articleCrossref, Google ScholarDe Neys, W., Schaeken, W., d’Ydewalle, G.(2000). Causal conditional reasoning, semantic memory retrieval, and mental models: A test of the ‘semantic memory framework’. (Tech. Rep. No. 270). Leuven, Belgium: University of Leuven, Laboratory of Experimental Psychology. First citation in articleGoogle ScholarElio, R.(1997). What to believe when inferences are contradicted. The impact of knowledge type and inference rule. In M. G. Shafto & P. Langley (Eds.), Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society 211– 216 Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. First citation in articleGoogle ScholarElio, R.(1998). How to disbelieve p → q: Resolving contradictions. Proceedings of the Twentieth Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society pp. 315– 320 Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. First citation in articleGoogle ScholarEvans, J. St. B. T.(1993). The mental model theory of conditional reasoning: Critical appraisal and revision. Cognition, 48(1), 1– 20 First citation in articleCrossref, Google ScholarEvans, J. St. B. T., Twyman-Musgrove, J.(1998). Conditional reasoning with inducements and advice. Cognition, 69(1), B11– B16 First citation in articleCrossref, Google ScholarFillenbaum, S.(1975). If: Some uses. Psychological Research, 37, 245– 260 First citation in articleCrossref, Google ScholarFillenbaum, S.(1976). Inducements: On phrasing and logic of conditional promises, threats and warnings. Psychological Research, 38, 231– 250 First citation in articleCrossref, Google ScholarFillenbaum, S.(1978). How to do some things with IF. In J. W. Cotton & R. L. Klatzky (Eds.), Semantic factors in cognition 169– 214 Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. First citation in articleGoogle ScholarGrice, H. P.(1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics (Vol. 3, pp. 41– 58 ). New York: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle ScholarJohnson-Laird, P. N.(1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. First citation in articleGoogle ScholarJohnson-Laird, P. N., Legrenzi, P., Legrenzi, M. S(1972). Reasoning and a sense of reality. British Journal of Psychology, 63(3), 395– 400 First citation in articleCrossref, Google ScholarLevinson, S.(2000). Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge, UK: MIT Press.. First citation in articleCrossref, Google ScholarLui, I., Lo, K., Wu, J.(1996). A probabilistic interpretation of ‘If-then’. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49, 828– 844 First citation in articleCrossref, Google ScholarManktelow, K. I., Fairley, N.(2000). Superordinate principles in reasoning with causal and deontic conditionals. Thinking-and-Reasoning, 6(1), 41– 65 First citation in articleCrossref, Google ScholarMyers, R.(1990). Classical and modern regression with applications. (2nd Ed.). Boston, MA: Duxbury Press. First citation in articleGoogle ScholarNewstead, S. E., Ellis, C., Evans, J. St. B. T., Dennis, I.(1997). Conditional reasoning with realistic material. Thinking and Reasoning, 3, 49– 96 First citation in articleCrossref, Google ScholarOaksford, M., Chater, N.(2001). The probabilistic approach to human reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5(8), 349– 357 First citation in articleCrossref, Google ScholarRips, L. J.(2001). Two kinds of reasoning. Psychological Science, 121(2), 129– 134 First citation in articleCrossref, Google ScholarStevenson, R., Over, D. E.(1995). Deduction from uncertain premises. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48A, 613– 643 First citation in articleCrossref, Google ScholarThompson, V. A.(1994). Interpretational factors in conditional reasoning. Memory and Cognition, 22, 742– 758 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google ScholarThompson, V. A.(2000). The task-specific nature of domain-general reasoning. Cognition, 76, 209– 268 First citation in articleCrossref Medline, Google ScholarWason, P. C.(1966). Reasoning. In B. M. Foss (Ed.), New horizons in psychology: Vol. 1. Harmondsworth, UK, Penguin. First citation in articleGoogle ScholarFiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byProcessing Attenuating NPIs in Indicative and Counterfactual Conditionals10 June 2022 | Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 13The Suppression of Inferences From Counterfactual Conditionals14 April 2020 | Cognitive Science, Vol. 44, No. 4The specificity of terms affects conditional reasoning9 May 2018 | Thinking & Reasoning, Vol. 25, No. 1Advice conditionals about tips and warnings: interpretations and inferences17 January 2017 | Journal of Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 29, No. 3Disabling conditional inferences: An EEG studyNeuropsychologia, Vol. 56The Influence of Causal Conditional Reasoning on the Acceptance of Product Claims1 April 2009 | Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 35, No. 6Reasoning Under Time Pressure A Study of Causal Conditional Inference> Jonathan St. B. T. Evans , Simon J. Handley, and Alison M. Bacon6 February 2009 | Experimental Psychology, Vol. 56, No. 2Developmental trends in everyday conditional reasoning: The retrieval and inhibition interplayJournal of Experimental Child Psychology, Vol. 100, No. 4Reasoning with conditionals: Does every counterexample count? It’s frequency that countsMemory & Cognition, Vol. 35, No. 8Experimental Psychology: A Successful TransitionEdgar Erdfelder15 February 2007 | Experimental Psychology, Vol. 54, No. 1Two Varieties of Conditionals and Two Kinds of Defeaters Help Reveal Two Fundamental Types of ReasoningMind <html_ent glyph=@amp; ascii=&/> Language, Vol. 21, No. 4A dual-process specification of causal conditional reasoningThinking & Reasoning, Vol. 11, No. 3Working memory and counterexample retrieval for causal conditionalsThinking & Reasoning, Vol. 11, No. 2Suppositions, extensionality, and conditionals: A critique of the mental model theory of Johnson-Laird and Byrne (2002).1 January 2005 | Psychological Review, Vol. 112, No. 4On Raising the International Dissemination of German Research Does Changing Publication Language to English Attract Foreign Authors to Publish in a German Basic Psychology Research Journal?Andreas Dinkel, Hendrik Berth, Ada Borkenhagen, and Elmar Brähler1 September 2006 | Experimental Psychology, Vol. 51, No. 4Editorial Experimental Psychology: Quo vadis?Karl Christoph Klauer1 September 2006 | Experimental Psychology, Vol. 50, No. 1 Volume 49Issue 3July 2002ISSN: 1618-3169eISSN: 2190-5142 InformationExperimental Psychology (2002), 49, pp. 181-195 https://doi.org/10.1026//1618-3169.49.3.181.© 2002Hogrefe & Huber PublishersKeywordsconditional reasoningrealistic materialcontentalternativesAcknowledgments:This research was carried out with support from the IUAP/PAI P4 (Kristien Dieussaert and Géry d’Ydewalle) and from the Fund for Scientific Research Flanders (Walter Schaeken and Kristien Dieussaert). We wish to thank Stephen Newstead (University of Plymouth, UK) for putting the items from his study at our disposition. Further, we are very grateful to Frank Rijmen (University of Leuven, Belgium), for his advice on statistical matters. Finally, we would like to thank the reviewers for their helpful comments that led to a considerable improvement of the manuscript’s readability.PDF download" @default.
• W2008740098 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2008740098 creator A5000996049 @default.
• W2008740098 creator A5066635139 @default.
• W2008740098 creator A5091267797 @default.
• W2008740098 date "2002-07-01" @default.
• W2008740098 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2008740098 title "The Relative Contribution of Content and Context Factors on the Interpretation of Conditionals" @default.
• W2008740098 cites W1587606825 @default.
• W2008740098 cites W1981753740 @default.
• W2008740098 cites W1983315389 @default.
• W2008740098 cites W1989304657 @default.
• W2008740098 cites W1998889600 @default.
• W2008740098 cites W2019092422 @default.
• W2008740098 cites W2020310799 @default.
• W2008740098 cites W2026041266 @default.
• W2008740098 cites W2026597510 @default.
• W2008740098 cites W2032112214 @default.
• W2008740098 cites W2032152873 @default.
• W2008740098 cites W2040981305 @default.
• W2008740098 cites W2053715871 @default.
• W2008740098 cites W2079680461 @default.
• W2008740098 cites W2090260807 @default.
• W2008740098 cites W2092873623 @default.
• W2008740098 cites W2098036909 @default.
• W2008740098 cites W2135408231 @default.
• W2008740098 cites W2137535163 @default.
• W2008740098 cites W2144874553 @default.
• W2008740098 cites W2264742718 @default.
• W2008740098 cites W2898519191 @default.
• W2008740098 cites W624610560 @default.
• W2008740098 doi "https://doi.org/10.1026/1618-3169.49.3.181" @default.
• W2008740098 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12152362" @default.
• W2008740098 hasPublicationYear "2002" @default.
• W2008740098 type Work @default.
• W2008740098 sameAs 2008740098 @default.
• W2008740098 citedByCount "14" @default.
• W2008740098 countsByYear W20087400982012 @default.
• W2008740098 countsByYear W20087400982013 @default.
• W2008740098 countsByYear W20087400982021 @default.
• W2008740098 countsByYear W20087400982022 @default.
• W2008740098 countsByYear W20087400982023 @default.
• W2008740098 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2008740098 hasAuthorship W2008740098A5000996049 @default.
• W2008740098 hasAuthorship W2008740098A5066635139 @default.
• W2008740098 hasAuthorship W2008740098A5091267797 @default.
• W2008740098 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2008740098 hasConcept C134306372 @default.
• W2008740098 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2008740098 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2008740098 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W2008740098 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W2008740098 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W2008740098 hasConcept C2778152352 @default.
• W2008740098 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W2008740098 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2008740098 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2008740098 hasConcept C527412718 @default.
• W2008740098 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2008740098 hasConceptScore W2008740098C111472728 @default.
• W2008740098 hasConceptScore W2008740098C134306372 @default.
• W2008740098 hasConceptScore W2008740098C138885662 @default.
• W2008740098 hasConceptScore W2008740098C15744967 @default.
• W2008740098 hasConceptScore W2008740098C166957645 @default.
• W2008740098 hasConceptScore W2008740098C180747234 @default.
• W2008740098 hasConceptScore W2008740098C205649164 @default.
• W2008740098 hasConceptScore W2008740098C2778152352 @default.
• W2008740098 hasConceptScore W2008740098C2779343474 @default.
• W2008740098 hasConceptScore W2008740098C33923547 @default.
• W2008740098 hasConceptScore W2008740098C41895202 @default.
• W2008740098 hasConceptScore W2008740098C527412718 @default.
• W2008740098 hasConceptScore W2008740098C77805123 @default.
• W2008740098 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2008740098 hasLocation W20087400981 @default.
• W2008740098 hasLocation W20087400982 @default.
• W2008740098 hasOpenAccess W2008740098 @default.
• W2008740098 hasPrimaryLocation W20087400981 @default.
• W2008740098 hasRelatedWork W1965143872 @default.
• W2008740098 hasRelatedWork W1988185375 @default.
• W2008740098 hasRelatedWork W2018735470 @default.
• W2008740098 hasRelatedWork W2075959928 @default.
• W2008740098 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2008740098 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2008740098 hasRelatedWork W2909608724 @default.
• W2008740098 hasRelatedWork W2991333141 @default.
• W2008740098 hasRelatedWork W4235024301 @default.
• W2008740098 hasRelatedWork W4295113718 @default.
• W2008740098 hasVolume "49" @default.
• W2008740098 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2008740098 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2008740098 magId "2008740098" @default.
• W2008740098 workType "article" @default.