FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2008760689> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2008760689 abstract "OBjECTIvEs To study the effects of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC) Interdisciplinary Leadership Development Program (ILDP) on interprofessional attitudes, beliefs, and use of skills. ILDP is a collaboration among five campus-based U.S. Maternal and Child Health Bureau-funded training programs. These programs included Leadership Education in Neurodevelopmental and Related Disabilities (LEND), Nutrition, Pediatric Dentistry, Public Health, and Social Work. METHODs Using a post-test design, participants in the ILDP from the five training programs were contacted to complete a web-based survey. LEND and Public Health graduates who had not participated in the ILDP were recruited for comparison. Using scales and open-ended questions, we asked graduates to rate the influence of ILDP on their attitudes/beliefs about interprofessional practice, to report the frequency of use of interdisciplinary skills, and to describe those influences on the use of skills in some detail. REsULTs The 208 respondents represented 60% of the graduates from 2001 through 2008. Graduates reported that the yearlong Interdisciplinary Leadership Development Program, a supplement to conventional discipline-based training influenced their interprofessional attitudes, beliefs, and the use of interprofessional skills. In particular, a 3-day Leadership Intensive workshop enhanced graduates’ understanding of individual leadership practices and heightened their appreciation of the assets and challenges of others working in groups. COnCLUsIOns With increasing focus on interprofessional health teams, many evaluations of training neither describe nor measure explicitly the elements of training that enable students to develop interprofessional attitudes, beliefs, and skills. In an evaluation that demonstrated these outcomes, we have described the key role of intentional, personal leadership training in producing these outcomes. Interprofessional training programs should be expected to provide logic models for the relationship between training and the desired outcomes. Received: 08/24/2014 Accepted: 02/08/2015 Published: 04/08/2015 © 2015 Margolis et al. This open access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. H IP & Interprofessional Leadership Education and Interprofessional Practice EDUCATIONAL STRATEGY 2(3):eP1071 | 2 Introduction To address the increasing complexity of public health and medical care, national and international entities and scholars have encouraged educators to develop programs to enhance the capacity of professionals to collaborate. Each group has suggested that some combination of dedicated interprofessional and interdisciplinary education and intentional practice are critical in creating competent interdisciplinary professionals. For example, To Err is Human calls for organizations to “establish interdisciplinary team training programs for providers” (Kohn, Corrigan, Donaldson, & McKenzie, 2000, p. 14), while Crossing the Quality Chasm advocates that “clinicians and institutions should actively collaborate and communicate to ensure an appropriate exchange of information and coordination of care” (Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, 2001, p. 209). Frenk et al. promote a competency-based approach to educating health professionals in which teamwork or collaboration is a core competency (Frenk et al., 2010), while the Interprofessional Education Collaborative recently underscored the need for a seamless transition from education to collaborative practice (Interprofessonal Educaton Collaborative Expert Panel, 2011). In a recent commentary, Berwick (2014) underscores the fundamental role of collaboration at the level of health systems, beyond clinical care. The first training programs supported by the United States federal Maternal and Child Health Bureau (MCHB) in the late 1940s were motivated by the need to develop professionals who could build services that enable children to benefit from the perspectives of multiple disciplines, such as physicians, nurses, and public health workers (Athey, Kavanaugh, Bagley, & Hutchins, undated). In recent years, the MCHB articulated 12 core leadership competencies (Table 1), six of which seem especially relevant to creating an interprofessional environment: communication, negotiation and conflict resolution, cultural competency, family-centered care, developing others through teaching and mentoring, and interdisciplinary team building (MCH Leadership Competencies Workgroup, June 2009). While the field of Maternal and Child Health (MCH) has produced many graduates who have provided interprofessional leadership, there is a paucity of research on the specific elements of interprofessional training Table 1. Core MCH Leadership Competencies 1. MCH Knowledge Base/Context 2. Self-reflection 3. Ethics & Professionalism 4. Critical Thinking 5. Communication 6. Negotiation & Conflict Resolution 7. Cultural Competency 8. Family-Centered Care 9. Developing Others through Teaching and Mentoring 10. Interdisciplinary Team Building 11. Working with Communities and Systems 12. Policy and Advocacy Source: Maternal and Child Health Leadership Competencies (Version 3.0). http://leadership.mchtraining.net/?page_id=132 that facilitate the development of interprofessional competencies. As reported elsewhere (Margolis et al., 2012) the MCH Leadership Consortium at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill has demonstrated that interprofessional training improved graduates’ attitudes and beliefs about the value of interprofessional practice, and increased their frequency of use of interprofessional skills in practice. The items used to elicit attitudes and beliefs and the frequency of skill use are shown in Table 2 (following page). Most importantly, graduates who reported stronger attitudes or beliefs about the value of interprofessional practice and more frequent use of interprofessional skills were statistically more likely to report that they had contributed to improvements in a specific program, organization, or partnership. This article addresses two questions: (1) how do graduates rate the impact of the Interdisciplinary Leadership Development Program (ILDP) on their attitudes/beliefs and use of skills? and (2) what components of the ILDP were influential in developing attitudes/beliefs and skills for interprofessional practice? We have identified themes that have the potential to inform interprofessional leadership training efforts by the MCH Bureau and other entities committed to workforce development." @default.
• W2008760689 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2008760689 creator A5059130841 @default.
• W2008760689 creator A5084083409 @default.
• W2008760689 creator A5090355489 @default.
• W2008760689 date "2015-01-01" @default.
• W2008760689 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2008760689 title "The Relationship between Interprofessional Leadership Education and Interprofessional Practice: How Intensive Personal Leadership Education Makes a Difference" @default.
• W2008760689 cites W145564465 @default.
• W2008760689 cites W1516534262 @default.
• W2008760689 cites W1841892384 @default.
• W2008760689 cites W1981665776 @default.
• W2008760689 cites W2006037848 @default.
• W2008760689 cites W2024641550 @default.
• W2008760689 cites W2065357409 @default.
• W2008760689 cites W2092789586 @default.
• W2008760689 cites W2099043956 @default.
• W2008760689 cites W2119763856 @default.
• W2008760689 cites W2124361429 @default.
• W2008760689 cites W2130026768 @default.
• W2008760689 cites W2148582469 @default.
• W2008760689 cites W2153674322 @default.
• W2008760689 cites W2166858912 @default.
• W2008760689 cites W2166987139 @default.
• W2008760689 cites W2962323685 @default.
• W2008760689 cites W602122930 @default.
• W2008760689 cites W66576854 @default.
• W2008760689 cites W2114878600 @default.
• W2008760689 doi "https://doi.org/10.7710/2159-1253.1071" @default.
• W2008760689 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2008760689 type Work @default.
• W2008760689 sameAs 2008760689 @default.
• W2008760689 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W2008760689 countsByYear W20087606892017 @default.
• W2008760689 countsByYear W20087606892018 @default.
• W2008760689 countsByYear W20087606892021 @default.
• W2008760689 countsByYear W20087606892022 @default.
• W2008760689 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2008760689 hasAuthorship W2008760689A5059130841 @default.
• W2008760689 hasAuthorship W2008760689A5084083409 @default.
• W2008760689 hasAuthorship W2008760689A5090355489 @default.
• W2008760689 hasBestOaLocation W20087606891 @default.
• W2008760689 hasConcept C111366508 @default.
• W2008760689 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2008760689 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2008760689 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W2008760689 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2008760689 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
• W2008760689 hasConcept C197386563 @default.
• W2008760689 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2008760689 hasConcept C2780271678 @default.
• W2008760689 hasConcept C2780367502 @default.
• W2008760689 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W2008760689 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W2008760689 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2008760689 hasConcept C7225491 @default.
• W2008760689 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2008760689 hasConceptScore W2008760689C111366508 @default.
• W2008760689 hasConceptScore W2008760689C15744967 @default.
• W2008760689 hasConceptScore W2008760689C159110408 @default.
• W2008760689 hasConceptScore W2008760689C160735492 @default.
• W2008760689 hasConceptScore W2008760689C17744445 @default.
• W2008760689 hasConceptScore W2008760689C19417346 @default.
• W2008760689 hasConceptScore W2008760689C197386563 @default.
• W2008760689 hasConceptScore W2008760689C199539241 @default.
• W2008760689 hasConceptScore W2008760689C2780271678 @default.
• W2008760689 hasConceptScore W2008760689C2780367502 @default.
• W2008760689 hasConceptScore W2008760689C39549134 @default.
• W2008760689 hasConceptScore W2008760689C509550671 @default.
• W2008760689 hasConceptScore W2008760689C71924100 @default.
• W2008760689 hasConceptScore W2008760689C7225491 @default.
• W2008760689 hasConceptScore W2008760689C77805123 @default.
• W2008760689 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2008760689 hasLocation W20087606891 @default.
• W2008760689 hasOpenAccess W2008760689 @default.
• W2008760689 hasPrimaryLocation W20087606891 @default.
• W2008760689 hasRelatedWork W192254902 @default.
• W2008760689 hasRelatedWork W2028611316 @default.
• W2008760689 hasRelatedWork W2049950365 @default.
• W2008760689 hasRelatedWork W2138591056 @default.
• W2008760689 hasRelatedWork W2405826400 @default.
• W2008760689 hasRelatedWork W2488878037 @default.
• W2008760689 hasRelatedWork W2955037235 @default.
• W2008760689 hasRelatedWork W3011424124 @default.
• W2008760689 hasRelatedWork W3088674504 @default.
• W2008760689 hasRelatedWork W3202396459 @default.
• W2008760689 hasVolume "2" @default.
• W2008760689 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2008760689 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2008760689 magId "2008760689" @default.
• W2008760689 workType "article" @default.