FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2009096417> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2009096417 endingPage "180" @default.
• W2009096417 startingPage "111" @default.
• W2009096417 abstract "The Liberatory Event in Paul of Tarsus Enrique Dussel (bio) Translated by George Ciccariello-Maher [Correction] In this work we hope to rethink a very timely subject for political philosophy in recent years.1 For epistemological reasons, however, we must deal in a different way with some themes common to the philosophy currently in vogue in Europe and the United States. Today political philosophy has unexpectedly taken up a subject that had been ignored since the Enlightenment. Kant himself, in Religion within the Limits of Pure Reason, addressed the subject with some degree of precision.2 In The Conflict of the Faculties he distinguished clearly between the tasks of the faculty of theology and the faculty of philosophy (W, 9:263ff.). In his time the great university faculties (or disciplines)-both those of Latin-Germanic Europe and those in the Byzantine and Muslim worlds-had always consisted of theology and law. It was only with the Enlightenment (and above all with Humboldt's founding of the University of Berlin) that the faculty of philosophy would gain the status of the fundamental faculty within the university. In an appendix (W, 1, 2:300ff.) to chapter 1 of the latter work, Kant sketches out the conflict between the faculties of theology and philosophy as a question of interpretations. For the philosopher from Königsberg, the biblical theologian is, properly speaking, he who is learned in the Scripture (der Schriftgelehrte) of the Church's faith, (W, [End Page 111] 1, A44:300) while with regard to Scripture (or the Bible) the philosopher is he who is learned in reason (der Vernunftgelehrte) . . . based on the internal laws that can be deduced from the very reason of each human being. (W, 1, A44: 300). And after an extensive argument he concludes that this is how one must conduct all interpretations of Scripture (Schriftauslegungen) (300)-that is, of the texts of Judeo-Christian Scripture (and the same could be said of the Egyptian Book of the Dead, the Indian Upanishads, the corpus of Buddhist texts, the Islamic Qur'an, or other texts considered sacred, and often held to be direct revelation, by their respective communities). Within the structure of the university, scripture resides within the faculty of theology (in Germano-Anglo-Saxon universities at least, because in Latin Europe these faculties would disappear from public universities for well-known historic reasons). Within the faculty of philosophy-since the Enlightenment-one could teach with reference to texts consisting of extensive, symbolically based rational narratives like Homer's Iliad and Odyssey or Hesiod's Theogony, which are religious texts full of gods, but which were nevertheless considered suitable for philosophical interpretation. On the contrary, it was strictly forbidden to philosophically use or interpret texts from the Judeo-Christian Bible such as Exodus, the Gospel of John, or Paul of Tarsus's Epistle to the Romans, as though these were intrinsically theological. The present task is to haul out these moth-eaten symbolic narratives (considered theological by enlightened Jacobin secularism) that are housed and studied in the faculty of theology, and to situate them for the first time within the faculty of philosophy as well. This would entail subjecting these texts to a hermeneutics, a strictly philosophical interpretation. And yet, going beyond Kant's meditations on the subject, we wish to clarify the question in a different and more precise manner. In the first place, (a) since they belong to everyday languages of the past, these symbolic, religious, and even in some cases mystical texts ought to be defined as symbolically based rational narratives, in the sense that they constitute myths, as Paul Ricoeur defines the term.3 These narratives, in the second place, can undergo a double-hermeneutic or interpretation: on the one hand, (b.1) [End Page 112] theologically, that is, and as Kant indicated, executed from a position of subjective conviction (what we could call religious faith), and (c.1) with reference to a religious community (what Kant calls a Church). Or, on the other hand, philosophically (b.2), to take up these symbolically based rational texts or narratives toward the goal of discovering their full rational meaning and the implicit theoretical-universal categories embedded within..." @default.
• W2009096417 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2009096417 creator A5033811670 @default.
• W2009096417 creator A5040236031 @default.
• W2009096417 date "2009-01-01" @default.
• W2009096417 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2009096417 title "The Liberatory Event in Paul of Tarsus" @default.
• W2009096417 cites W1472486915 @default.
• W2009096417 cites W1494871410 @default.
• W2009096417 cites W1497348010 @default.
• W2009096417 cites W1500884421 @default.
• W2009096417 cites W1507738571 @default.
• W2009096417 cites W1511004060 @default.
• W2009096417 cites W1520495994 @default.
• W2009096417 cites W1534058688 @default.
• W2009096417 cites W1586285108 @default.
• W2009096417 cites W1783409308 @default.
• W2009096417 cites W190764744 @default.
• W2009096417 cites W1981555846 @default.
• W2009096417 cites W2060130231 @default.
• W2009096417 cites W2063303857 @default.
• W2009096417 cites W2090979111 @default.
• W2009096417 cites W2109532669 @default.
• W2009096417 cites W2488256876 @default.
• W2009096417 cites W2490094418 @default.
• W2009096417 cites W3087591378 @default.
• W2009096417 cites W3183374753 @default.
• W2009096417 cites W372965722 @default.
• W2009096417 cites W390044298 @default.
• W2009096417 cites W561259506 @default.
• W2009096417 cites W569213011 @default.
• W2009096417 cites W581958490 @default.
• W2009096417 cites W616167190 @default.
• W2009096417 cites W634426752 @default.
• W2009096417 cites W644225585 @default.
• W2009096417 cites W9960199 @default.
• W2009096417 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/qui.0.0004" @default.
• W2009096417 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
• W2009096417 type Work @default.
• W2009096417 sameAs 2009096417 @default.
• W2009096417 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W2009096417 countsByYear W20090964172013 @default.
• W2009096417 countsByYear W20090964172017 @default.
• W2009096417 countsByYear W20090964172020 @default.
• W2009096417 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2009096417 hasAuthorship W2009096417A5033811670 @default.
• W2009096417 hasAuthorship W2009096417A5040236031 @default.
• W2009096417 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2009096417 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2009096417 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2009096417 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2009096417 hasConcept C161191863 @default.
• W2009096417 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2009096417 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2009096417 hasConcept C27206212 @default.
• W2009096417 hasConcept C2777855551 @default.
• W2009096417 hasConcept C2778692574 @default.
• W2009096417 hasConcept C2779457680 @default.
• W2009096417 hasConcept C2779662365 @default.
• W2009096417 hasConcept C2780326160 @default.
• W2009096417 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2009096417 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W2009096417 hasConcept C74916050 @default.
• W2009096417 hasConcept C79841651 @default.
• W2009096417 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W2009096417 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W2009096417 hasConceptScore W2009096417C111472728 @default.
• W2009096417 hasConceptScore W2009096417C121332964 @default.
• W2009096417 hasConceptScore W2009096417C138885662 @default.
• W2009096417 hasConceptScore W2009096417C144024400 @default.
• W2009096417 hasConceptScore W2009096417C161191863 @default.
• W2009096417 hasConceptScore W2009096417C17744445 @default.
• W2009096417 hasConceptScore W2009096417C199539241 @default.
• W2009096417 hasConceptScore W2009096417C27206212 @default.
• W2009096417 hasConceptScore W2009096417C2777855551 @default.
• W2009096417 hasConceptScore W2009096417C2778692574 @default.
• W2009096417 hasConceptScore W2009096417C2779457680 @default.
• W2009096417 hasConceptScore W2009096417C2779662365 @default.
• W2009096417 hasConceptScore W2009096417C2780326160 @default.
• W2009096417 hasConceptScore W2009096417C41008148 @default.
• W2009096417 hasConceptScore W2009096417C62520636 @default.
• W2009096417 hasConceptScore W2009096417C74916050 @default.
• W2009096417 hasConceptScore W2009096417C79841651 @default.
• W2009096417 hasConceptScore W2009096417C94625758 @default.
• W2009096417 hasConceptScore W2009096417C95457728 @default.
• W2009096417 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2009096417 hasLocation W20090964171 @default.
• W2009096417 hasOpenAccess W2009096417 @default.
• W2009096417 hasPrimaryLocation W20090964171 @default.
• W2009096417 hasRelatedWork W2328381648 @default.
• W2009096417 hasRelatedWork W2334258451 @default.
• W2009096417 hasRelatedWork W2358692750 @default.
• W2009096417 hasRelatedWork W244390925 @default.
• W2009096417 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2009096417 hasRelatedWork W2972046358 @default.
• W2009096417 hasRelatedWork W3016585806 @default.
• W2009096417 hasRelatedWork W4238485490 @default.
• W2009096417 hasRelatedWork W4300496548 @default.

• next