FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2009303824> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2009303824 endingPage "526" @default.
• W2009303824 startingPage "523" @default.
• W2009303824 abstract "Background Recent trials have assessed the impact of elective nerve division on patient outcome after inguinal herniorrhaphy. The aim of this study was to establish UK surgical practice of handling of structures in the inguinal canal during herniorrhaphy. Methods A cross-sectional survey of all Fellows (n = 1113) of the Association of Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland (ASGBI) was performed. The main outcomes were to determine method of inguinal hernia repair and routine practice for intra-operative handling of structures in the inguinal canal. Results A total of 852 (77%) questionnaires were returned, of which 784 (92%) surgeons performed inguinal herniorrhaphy. Approximately two-thirds (63%) of responding surgeons performed less than 50 procedures per annum and 37% conducted more than 50 procedures annually. Mesh was the preferred method used by 90% of surgeons; 6% used non-mesh, and 4% used other (laparoscopic) methods. Routine practice in relation to the inguinal structures varied by volume of hernia surgery; surgeons who conducted more than 50 procedures annually were more likely to visualize and preserve inguinal nerve structures. However, inconsistency in the answers suggested confusion over anatomy. Conclusion This is the first UK survey to investigate method of hernia repair and usual handling practice of inguinal canal structures. There was wide acceptance of the use of mesh in inguinal hernia repair, with the majority of UK surgeons favoring an open approach. Surgeons performing high volumes of herniorrhaphy were more likely to preserve, rather than transect, inguinal nerve structures. This variation in practice may confound assessment of long-term neuralgia and other post-herniorrhaphy pain syndromes. Recent trials have assessed the impact of elective nerve division on patient outcome after inguinal herniorrhaphy. The aim of this study was to establish UK surgical practice of handling of structures in the inguinal canal during herniorrhaphy. A cross-sectional survey of all Fellows (n = 1113) of the Association of Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland (ASGBI) was performed. The main outcomes were to determine method of inguinal hernia repair and routine practice for intra-operative handling of structures in the inguinal canal. A total of 852 (77%) questionnaires were returned, of which 784 (92%) surgeons performed inguinal herniorrhaphy. Approximately two-thirds (63%) of responding surgeons performed less than 50 procedures per annum and 37% conducted more than 50 procedures annually. Mesh was the preferred method used by 90% of surgeons; 6% used non-mesh, and 4% used other (laparoscopic) methods. Routine practice in relation to the inguinal structures varied by volume of hernia surgery; surgeons who conducted more than 50 procedures annually were more likely to visualize and preserve inguinal nerve structures. However, inconsistency in the answers suggested confusion over anatomy. This is the first UK survey to investigate method of hernia repair and usual handling practice of inguinal canal structures. There was wide acceptance of the use of mesh in inguinal hernia repair, with the majority of UK surgeons favoring an open approach. Surgeons performing high volumes of herniorrhaphy were more likely to preserve, rather than transect, inguinal nerve structures. This variation in practice may confound assessment of long-term neuralgia and other post-herniorrhaphy pain syndromes." @default.
• W2009303824 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2009303824 creator A5003264785 @default.
• W2009303824 creator A5042273129 @default.
• W2009303824 creator A5043221376 @default.
• W2009303824 creator A5064202101 @default.
• W2009303824 creator A5088248319 @default.
• W2009303824 date "2006-04-01" @default.
• W2009303824 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2009303824 title "A United Kingdom survey of surgical technique and handling practice of inguinal canal structures during hernia surgery" @default.
• W2009303824 cites W1962803928 @default.
• W2009303824 cites W1978753272 @default.
• W2009303824 cites W1986379998 @default.
• W2009303824 cites W2016892199 @default.
• W2009303824 cites W2020527416 @default.
• W2009303824 cites W2040719809 @default.
• W2009303824 cites W2048562128 @default.
• W2009303824 cites W2056291130 @default.
• W2009303824 cites W2060537914 @default.
• W2009303824 cites W2146185315 @default.
• W2009303824 cites W2318713766 @default.
• W2009303824 cites W3092572374 @default.
• W2009303824 cites W77779986 @default.
• W2009303824 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2005.09.008" @default.
• W2009303824 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16627062" @default.
• W2009303824 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
• W2009303824 type Work @default.
• W2009303824 sameAs 2009303824 @default.
• W2009303824 citedByCount "24" @default.
• W2009303824 countsByYear W20093038242014 @default.
• W2009303824 countsByYear W20093038242015 @default.
• W2009303824 countsByYear W20093038242016 @default.
• W2009303824 countsByYear W20093038242018 @default.
• W2009303824 countsByYear W20093038242019 @default.
• W2009303824 countsByYear W20093038242021 @default.
• W2009303824 countsByYear W20093038242022 @default.
• W2009303824 countsByYear W20093038242023 @default.
• W2009303824 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2009303824 hasAuthorship W2009303824A5003264785 @default.
• W2009303824 hasAuthorship W2009303824A5042273129 @default.
• W2009303824 hasAuthorship W2009303824A5043221376 @default.
• W2009303824 hasAuthorship W2009303824A5064202101 @default.
• W2009303824 hasAuthorship W2009303824A5088248319 @default.
• W2009303824 hasConcept C11171543 @default.
• W2009303824 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2009303824 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2009303824 hasConcept C2777647538 @default.
• W2009303824 hasConcept C2778196487 @default.
• W2009303824 hasConcept C2779096551 @default.
• W2009303824 hasConcept C2781132756 @default.
• W2009303824 hasConcept C2781140086 @default.
• W2009303824 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W2009303824 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2009303824 hasConceptScore W2009303824C11171543 @default.
• W2009303824 hasConceptScore W2009303824C141071460 @default.
• W2009303824 hasConceptScore W2009303824C15744967 @default.
• W2009303824 hasConceptScore W2009303824C2777647538 @default.
• W2009303824 hasConceptScore W2009303824C2778196487 @default.
• W2009303824 hasConceptScore W2009303824C2779096551 @default.
• W2009303824 hasConceptScore W2009303824C2781132756 @default.
• W2009303824 hasConceptScore W2009303824C2781140086 @default.
• W2009303824 hasConceptScore W2009303824C61434518 @default.
• W2009303824 hasConceptScore W2009303824C71924100 @default.
• W2009303824 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2009303824 hasLocation W20093038241 @default.
• W2009303824 hasLocation W20093038242 @default.
• W2009303824 hasOpenAccess W2009303824 @default.
• W2009303824 hasPrimaryLocation W20093038241 @default.
• W2009303824 hasRelatedWork W174632727 @default.
• W2009303824 hasRelatedWork W1976232931 @default.
• W2009303824 hasRelatedWork W1976311859 @default.
• W2009303824 hasRelatedWork W2018144414 @default.
• W2009303824 hasRelatedWork W2051972797 @default.
• W2009303824 hasRelatedWork W2202548566 @default.
• W2009303824 hasRelatedWork W2333937861 @default.
• W2009303824 hasRelatedWork W2418386809 @default.
• W2009303824 hasRelatedWork W2974384231 @default.
• W2009303824 hasRelatedWork W1907710086 @default.
• W2009303824 hasVolume "139" @default.
• W2009303824 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2009303824 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2009303824 magId "2009303824" @default.
• W2009303824 workType "article" @default.