Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2009509675> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2009509675 endingPage "338" @default.
- W2009509675 startingPage "329" @default.
- W2009509675 abstract "The optimal cardiovascular preparticipation screen is debated. The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review/meta-analysis of evidence comparing screening strategies. PRIMSA guidelines were followed. Electronic databases were searched from January 1996 to November 2014 for articles examining the efficacy of screening with history and physical exam (PE) based on the American Heart Association (AHA) or similar recommendations and electrocardiogram (ECG). Pooled data was analyzed for sensitivity, specificity, false positive rates and positive and negative likelihood ratios. Secondary outcomes included rate of potentially lethal cardiovascular conditions detected with screening and the etiology of pathology discovered. Fifteen articles reporting on 47,137 athletes were reviewed. After meta-analysis the sensitivity and specificity of ECG was 94%/93%, history 20%/94%, and PE 9%/97%. The overall false positive rate of ECG (6%) was less than that of history (8%), or physical exam (10%). Positive likelihood ratios were ECG 14.8, history 3.22 and PE 2.93 and negative likelihood ratios were ECG 0.055, history 0.85, and PE 0.93. There were a total of 160 potentially lethal cardiovascular conditions detected for a rate of 0.3% or 1 in 294. The most common pathology was Wolff-Parkinson-White (67, 42%), Long QT Syndrome (18, 11%), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (18, 11%), dilated cardiomyopathy (11, 7%), coronary artery disease or myocardial ischemia (9, 6%) and arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (4, 3%). The most effective strategy for screening for cardiovascular disease in athletes is ECG. It is 5 times more sensitive than history, 10 times more sensitive than physical exam, has higher positive likelihood ratio, lower negative likelihood ratio and a lower false positive rate. 12-lead ECG interpreted using modern criteria should be considered best practice in screening for cardiovascular disease in athletes while the use of history and physical alone as a screening tool should be reevaluated." @default.
- W2009509675 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2009509675 creator A5012810896 @default.
- W2009509675 creator A5037121463 @default.
- W2009509675 creator A5056132480 @default.
- W2009509675 date "2015-05-01" @default.
- W2009509675 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
- W2009509675 title "The effectiveness of screening history, physical exam, and ECG to detect potentially lethal cardiac disorders in athletes: A systematic review/meta-analysis" @default.
- W2009509675 cites W178617755 @default.
- W2009509675 cites W1963663255 @default.
- W2009509675 cites W1972978148 @default.
- W2009509675 cites W1973188639 @default.
- W2009509675 cites W1985701457 @default.
- W2009509675 cites W1992907868 @default.
- W2009509675 cites W2000707238 @default.
- W2009509675 cites W2002019713 @default.
- W2009509675 cites W2004972242 @default.
- W2009509675 cites W2005262412 @default.
- W2009509675 cites W2013759344 @default.
- W2009509675 cites W2020030057 @default.
- W2009509675 cites W2021709123 @default.
- W2009509675 cites W2022588850 @default.
- W2009509675 cites W2024214116 @default.
- W2009509675 cites W2028801702 @default.
- W2009509675 cites W2033226705 @default.
- W2009509675 cites W2034071274 @default.
- W2009509675 cites W2040336929 @default.
- W2009509675 cites W2044926365 @default.
- W2009509675 cites W2064128599 @default.
- W2009509675 cites W2074820581 @default.
- W2009509675 cites W2075133148 @default.
- W2009509675 cites W2075878176 @default.
- W2009509675 cites W2077698761 @default.
- W2009509675 cites W2080065868 @default.
- W2009509675 cites W2080786426 @default.
- W2009509675 cites W2081745189 @default.
- W2009509675 cites W2083804504 @default.
- W2009509675 cites W2085486395 @default.
- W2009509675 cites W2096363558 @default.
- W2009509675 cites W2096998556 @default.
- W2009509675 cites W2098619351 @default.
- W2009509675 cites W2115566134 @default.
- W2009509675 cites W2116191762 @default.
- W2009509675 cites W2116308061 @default.
- W2009509675 cites W2117318983 @default.
- W2009509675 cites W2119818461 @default.
- W2009509675 cites W2127589895 @default.
- W2009509675 cites W2131177330 @default.
- W2009509675 cites W2135205938 @default.
- W2009509675 cites W2145791851 @default.
- W2009509675 cites W2148788413 @default.
- W2009509675 cites W2149322255 @default.
- W2009509675 cites W2150415193 @default.
- W2009509675 cites W2151103157 @default.
- W2009509675 cites W2155338686 @default.
- W2009509675 cites W2155461590 @default.
- W2009509675 cites W2161310186 @default.
- W2009509675 cites W2162071044 @default.
- W2009509675 cites W2170619358 @default.
- W2009509675 cites W2253719748 @default.
- W2009509675 cites W2326458613 @default.
- W2009509675 cites W2330061986 @default.
- W2009509675 cites W39432941 @default.
- W2009509675 cites W4205487068 @default.
- W2009509675 cites W4253684638 @default.
- W2009509675 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2015.02.001" @default.
- W2009509675 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25701104" @default.
- W2009509675 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
- W2009509675 type Work @default.
- W2009509675 sameAs 2009509675 @default.
- W2009509675 citedByCount "179" @default.
- W2009509675 countsByYear W20095096752015 @default.
- W2009509675 countsByYear W20095096752016 @default.
- W2009509675 countsByYear W20095096752017 @default.
- W2009509675 countsByYear W20095096752018 @default.
- W2009509675 countsByYear W20095096752019 @default.
- W2009509675 countsByYear W20095096752020 @default.
- W2009509675 countsByYear W20095096752021 @default.
- W2009509675 countsByYear W20095096752022 @default.
- W2009509675 countsByYear W20095096752023 @default.
- W2009509675 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2009509675 hasAuthorship W2009509675A5012810896 @default.
- W2009509675 hasAuthorship W2009509675A5037121463 @default.
- W2009509675 hasAuthorship W2009509675A5056132480 @default.
- W2009509675 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2009509675 hasConcept C144494922 @default.
- W2009509675 hasConcept C164705383 @default.
- W2009509675 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
- W2009509675 hasConcept C206179267 @default.
- W2009509675 hasConcept C2778198053 @default.
- W2009509675 hasConcept C2778213512 @default.
- W2009509675 hasConcept C2778797674 @default.
- W2009509675 hasConcept C2780185194 @default.
- W2009509675 hasConcept C2781054738 @default.
- W2009509675 hasConcept C2781179581 @default.
- W2009509675 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2009509675 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
- W2009509675 hasConceptScore W2009509675C126322002 @default.