Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2009608417> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2009608417 endingPage "204" @default.
- W2009608417 startingPage "1" @default.
- W2009608417 abstract "Background Some 15 million people in England have a long-term condition (LTC) but there is concern about whether or not the NHS meets their needs. To address this, consecutive governments have developed policies aimed at improving service delivery and patient and public engagement and involvement (PPEI). There has been little research that examines the impact or benefit of PPEI in commissioning. This project explored the role and impact of PPEI in commissioning for people with LTCs. The research was undertaken during a period of substantial change in the English NHS, which enabled us to observe how the NHS reforms in England impacted on approaches to PPEI. Aim The aim was to examine how commissioners enable voice and engagement of people with LTCs and identify what impact this has on the commissioning process and pattern of services. Our specific objectives were to (1) critically analyse the relationship between the public/patient voice and the impact on the commissioning process; (2) determine how changes in the commissioning process reshape local services; (3) explore whether or not any such changes in services impact on the patient experience; (4) identify if and how commissioners enable the voice and engagement of people with LTCs; and (5) identify how patient groups/patient representatives get their voice heard and what mechanisms and processes patients and the public use to make their voice heard. Methods We used a case study design examining the experience of PPEI in three LTC groups – diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis and neurological conditions – through three in-depth case studies. Our approach involved reviewing practice across the UK and then focusing on three geographical areas to examine practices of commissioning health care for people with LTCs, approaches to PPEI, patterns of services for people with LTCs and the activities of local patient and voluntary organisations for people with LTCs. The research had five phases and involved participatory and interactive methods of data collection and analysis. Findings We identified two key areas where improvements to practice in relation to PPEI can be made. The first relates to the framework or infrastructure arrangements for PPEI and how PPEI can be supported in the NHS and other organisations. To combat short-termism and the fragility of PPEI activities, sufficient resources need to be invested in developing shared understandings and sustaining relationships and infrastructures. The second area of action relates to the process for PPEI and how it should be undertaken. Conclusion Action needs to be taken by organisations at both national and local levels. PPEI is a circular process and, in itself, extremely fragile. This circular process can be ‘ virtuous’ – successful engagement leads to improved involvement and outcomes. However, where involvement is tokenistic or ends, patients and the public become disengaged and less involved and can be described as a ‘ vicious circle’ . In addition, we identified a number of key methodological issues and areas for further research that should be considered by research funders and researchers undertaking research in the area of PPEI, including a need for research on PPEI with young people. Funding The National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme." @default.
- W2009608417 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2009608417 creator A5005648906 @default.
- W2009608417 creator A5012827567 @default.
- W2009608417 creator A5015746655 @default.
- W2009608417 creator A5026824993 @default.
- W2009608417 creator A5033671775 @default.
- W2009608417 creator A5058895828 @default.
- W2009608417 creator A5073284225 @default.
- W2009608417 creator A5075203683 @default.
- W2009608417 creator A5075542393 @default.
- W2009608417 date "2014-11-01" @default.
- W2009608417 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
- W2009608417 title "Commissioning for long-term conditions: hearing the voice of and engaging users – a qualitative multiple case study" @default.
- W2009608417 cites W1588818872 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W1855570112 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W1915592020 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W1966093165 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W1972677923 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W1977040272 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W1977992446 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W1981643300 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W1982482798 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W1982490010 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W1983536672 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W1984384875 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W1984636635 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W1996799296 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W1997755766 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W2002333157 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W2005348397 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W2008251417 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W2019632576 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W2023760594 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W2029162898 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W2029849580 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W2031090903 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W2033149041 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W2040189749 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W2040895148 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W2046738366 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W2051284970 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W2052573258 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W2052745178 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W2056115309 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W2056777260 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W2062102383 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W2068104800 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W2082002641 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W2084481813 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W2085637447 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W2093344145 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W2096019356 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W2098765460 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W2099562427 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W2114635764 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W2121244411 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W2122402281 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W2125204204 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W2128122898 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W2132100378 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W2134620148 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W2134631016 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W2142226417 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W2142836954 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W2142904476 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W2145010251 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W2147964442 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W2149622663 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W2150874461 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W2153696721 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W2157550718 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W2158289983 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W2161436779 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W2161601567 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W2162546388 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W2169604008 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W2326340737 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W2574992073 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W4238122910 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W4239546189 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W4243895876 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W4246598484 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W4248854933 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W4253112907 @default.
- W2009608417 cites W45702885 @default.
- W2009608417 doi "https://doi.org/10.3310/hsdr02440" @default.
- W2009608417 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25642540" @default.
- W2009608417 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
- W2009608417 type Work @default.
- W2009608417 sameAs 2009608417 @default.
- W2009608417 citedByCount "11" @default.
- W2009608417 countsByYear W20096084172015 @default.
- W2009608417 countsByYear W20096084172016 @default.
- W2009608417 countsByYear W20096084172017 @default.
- W2009608417 countsByYear W20096084172019 @default.
- W2009608417 countsByYear W20096084172020 @default.
- W2009608417 countsByYear W20096084172022 @default.