FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2009757908> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2009757908 endingPage "812" @default.
• W2009757908 startingPage "809" @default.
• W2009757908 abstract "<h3>Abstract</h3> <b>Objective</b>: To compare mammography reading by one radiologist with independent reading by two radiologists. <b>Design</b>: An observational non-randomised trial at St Margaret9s Hospital, Epping. <b>Subjects</b>: 33734 consecutive attenders for breast screening in the main trial and a sample of 132 attenders for assessment who provided data on private costs. <b>Interventions</b>: Three reporting policies were compared: single reading, consensus double reading, and non-consensus double reading. <b>Main outcome measures</b>: Numbers of cancers detected, recall rates, screening and assessment costs, and cost effectiveness ratios. <b>Results</b>: A policy of double reading followed by consensus detected an additional nine cancers per 10000 women screened (95% confidence interval 5 to 13) compared with single reading. A non-consensus double reading policy detected an additional 10 cancers per 10000 women screened (95% confidence interval 6 to 14). The difference in numbers of cancers detected between the consensus and non-consensus double reading policies was not significant (95% confidence interval -0.2 to 2.2). The proportion of women recalled for assessment after consensus double reading was significantly lower than after single reading (difference 2.7%; 95% confidence interval 2.4% to 3.0%). The recall rate with the non-consensus policy was significantly higher than with single reading (difference 3.0%; 2.5% to 3.5%). Consensus double reading cost less than single reading (saving pounds sterling4853 per 10000 women screened). Non-consensus double reading cost more than single reading (difference pounds sterling19259 per 10000 women screened). <b>Conclusions</b>: In the screening unit studied a consensus double reading policy was more effective and less costly than a single reading policy. <h3>Key messages</h3> Key messages Double reading of screening mammograms detects more cancers than does single reading Double reading with consensus reduces recall rates and has a lower total cost than single reading Breast screening units should consider adopting consensus double reporting for the first screening examination in order to improve efficiency Double reading with consensus is also likely to confer benefits at subsequent screening examinations, though the magnitude and cost effectiveness of these benefits are not known" @default.
• W2009757908 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2009757908 creator A5015667412 @default.
• W2009757908 creator A5059809327 @default.
• W2009757908 creator A5089715903 @default.
• W2009757908 date "1996-03-30" @default.
• W2009757908 modified "2023-10-03" @default.
• W2009757908 title "Mammography screening: an incremental cost effectiveness analysis of double versus single reading of mammograms" @default.
• W2009757908 cites W1528652404 @default.
• W2009757908 cites W2010895012 @default.
• W2009757908 cites W2015278915 @default.
• W2009757908 cites W2031940570 @default.
• W2009757908 cites W2045207475 @default.
• W2009757908 cites W2078003738 @default.
• W2009757908 cites W2081870210 @default.
• W2009757908 cites W2092198319 @default.
• W2009757908 cites W2098985260 @default.
• W2009757908 cites W2187084857 @default.
• W2009757908 doi "https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.312.7034.809" @default.
• W2009757908 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/2350705" @default.
• W2009757908 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8608287" @default.
• W2009757908 hasPublicationYear "1996" @default.
• W2009757908 type Work @default.
• W2009757908 sameAs 2009757908 @default.
• W2009757908 citedByCount "125" @default.
• W2009757908 countsByYear W20097579082012 @default.
• W2009757908 countsByYear W20097579082013 @default.
• W2009757908 countsByYear W20097579082014 @default.
• W2009757908 countsByYear W20097579082015 @default.
• W2009757908 countsByYear W20097579082016 @default.
• W2009757908 countsByYear W20097579082017 @default.
• W2009757908 countsByYear W20097579082018 @default.
• W2009757908 countsByYear W20097579082019 @default.
• W2009757908 countsByYear W20097579082020 @default.
• W2009757908 countsByYear W20097579082021 @default.
• W2009757908 countsByYear W20097579082023 @default.
• W2009757908 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2009757908 hasAuthorship W2009757908A5015667412 @default.
• W2009757908 hasAuthorship W2009757908A5059809327 @default.
• W2009757908 hasAuthorship W2009757908A5089715903 @default.
• W2009757908 hasBestOaLocation W20097579082 @default.
• W2009757908 hasConcept C100660578 @default.
• W2009757908 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2009757908 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2009757908 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2009757908 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2009757908 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W2009757908 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2009757908 hasConcept C2780472235 @default.
• W2009757908 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W2009757908 hasConcept C530470458 @default.
• W2009757908 hasConcept C554936623 @default.
• W2009757908 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2009757908 hasConceptScore W2009757908C100660578 @default.
• W2009757908 hasConceptScore W2009757908C121608353 @default.
• W2009757908 hasConceptScore W2009757908C126322002 @default.
• W2009757908 hasConceptScore W2009757908C15744967 @default.
• W2009757908 hasConceptScore W2009757908C17744445 @default.
• W2009757908 hasConceptScore W2009757908C180747234 @default.
• W2009757908 hasConceptScore W2009757908C199539241 @default.
• W2009757908 hasConceptScore W2009757908C2780472235 @default.
• W2009757908 hasConceptScore W2009757908C44249647 @default.
• W2009757908 hasConceptScore W2009757908C530470458 @default.
• W2009757908 hasConceptScore W2009757908C554936623 @default.
• W2009757908 hasConceptScore W2009757908C71924100 @default.
• W2009757908 hasIssue "7034" @default.
• W2009757908 hasLocation W20097579081 @default.
• W2009757908 hasLocation W20097579082 @default.
• W2009757908 hasLocation W20097579083 @default.
• W2009757908 hasLocation W20097579084 @default.
• W2009757908 hasOpenAccess W2009757908 @default.
• W2009757908 hasPrimaryLocation W20097579081 @default.
• W2009757908 hasRelatedWork W1982701827 @default.
• W2009757908 hasRelatedWork W1990357601 @default.
• W2009757908 hasRelatedWork W2012396877 @default.
• W2009757908 hasRelatedWork W2104222170 @default.
• W2009757908 hasRelatedWork W2106953835 @default.
• W2009757908 hasRelatedWork W2157474467 @default.
• W2009757908 hasRelatedWork W2525062096 @default.
• W2009757908 hasRelatedWork W2946794472 @default.
• W2009757908 hasRelatedWork W4292004254 @default.
• W2009757908 hasRelatedWork W581550530 @default.
• W2009757908 hasVolume "312" @default.
• W2009757908 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2009757908 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2009757908 magId "2009757908" @default.
• W2009757908 workType "article" @default.