Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2009792901> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 69 of
69
with 100 items per page.
- W2009792901 endingPage "522" @default.
- W2009792901 startingPage "501" @default.
- W2009792901 abstract "Getting Past No in Scylla and Charybdis John Gordon (bio) I For a long time, discussion of Scylla and Charybdis has tended to be over-mindful of the [n]o that Stephen answers when John Eglinton asks him whether he believes his theory about William Shakespeare (U 9.1067).1 For some, in fact, it is as if the whole production had turned out to be a shaggy-dog story with a weak punchline. I question this evaluation and begin by suggesting that Joyce would not willingly have wasted his reader's time like that, especially in an episode that he considered the final curtain of his book's first half.2 After all, that word believe is one that Ulysses has invited us to fuss over ever since Haines asked Stephen, You're not a believer, are you? (U 1.611), and received no straight answer. In Scylla and Charybdis, the word's chief exponent is, again, Eglinton, who uses some version of it nine times, often with significantly different senses. For instance, right after the question to Stephen, he remarks of one Herr Karl Bleibtreu that he believes his theory (U 9.1077). That is, he, at least, believes his theory, unlike a certain young person present whom Eglinton could mention. Bleibtreu's theory was that Shakespeare's plays were written by Roger Manners, the fifth earl of Rutland. He had other beliefs too. He was a highly vocal anti-Semite (it was he who informed Joyce, doubtless with scorn,3 that the original name of the eminent Lee—JJII 411), a paranoid Teutonophile obsessed with protecting Germany's volkische literature from foreign contamination, and, by the time Scylla and Charybdis was being written, someone who was literally identifying with Napoleon.4 Bleibtreu was, in short, a nut and is clearly to be taken as one. Indeed, the whole library discussion occurs against a background of nutty ideas about Shakespeare, all devoutly believed in by various cranks. In the episode's dialectic, this lot occupies the hard right. True believers, they correspond to the Scyllan rock-monster—the one with six maws for swallowing you up. They represent one way of getting Shakespeare wrong. At the other extreme is the woozy whirlpool [End Page 501] represented, in Scylla and Charybdis, by the combined forces of Eglinton, A.E., Thomas Lyster, Richard Best, and Buck Mulligan,5 who collectively think that anyone pretending to any belief about Shakespeare distinct from everyone else's automatically belongs with the company of those rabid rock-dwellers opposite. This face-off helps explain Stephen's apparent quibble about the word, on hearing Eglinton compare his professed lack of belief to Bleibtreu's fast faith: I believe, O Lord, help my unbelief. That is, help me to believe or help me to unbelieve? Who helps to believe? Egomen. Who to unbelieve? Other chap (U 9.1078-80). The other chap there is surely the Eglinton who, with some help from the rest of the gang, has just elicited that [n]o. He, and they, are one side of the dialectic. But there is another side—Egomen—I, on the other hand—in the context, clearly, Stephen, who, despite this latest setback, considers himself still in the game and who intends to continue to try to believe. But believe what? In a theory. What theory? A theory he can believe in. Stephen's [n]o is really more of a not yet. As such, it distinguishes him from the Scyllan dogmatists, Bleibtreu and the rest, who have made up, and closed, their minds for good. But it also distinguishes him from the whirlpool opposite. Stephen is trying to get somewhere. A whirlpool just goes around and around. That is to say, Stephen's theory is a work in progress.6 Cast as a dramatic performance—one that begins with the beginning of Hamlet and concludes with the last lines of Cymbeline—this is a production very much in its pre-Broadway tryout stage. Mistakes, accordingly, happen. At one point, Stephen catches himself repeating a one-liner he has used already (U 9.397-99, 335). Oops. Next time, he will be sure not to do..." @default.
- W2009792901 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2009792901 creator A5050489933 @default.
- W2009792901 date "2008-01-01" @default.
- W2009792901 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
- W2009792901 title "Getting Past No in Scylla and Charybdis" @default.
- W2009792901 cites W1491133779 @default.
- W2009792901 cites W1506075406 @default.
- W2009792901 cites W1531907742 @default.
- W2009792901 cites W1535175357 @default.
- W2009792901 cites W1567042009 @default.
- W2009792901 cites W1569036873 @default.
- W2009792901 cites W1569265548 @default.
- W2009792901 cites W1570506960 @default.
- W2009792901 cites W1571647820 @default.
- W2009792901 cites W1588176272 @default.
- W2009792901 cites W1590672631 @default.
- W2009792901 cites W2058577441 @default.
- W2009792901 cites W2071148113 @default.
- W2009792901 cites W2078340773 @default.
- W2009792901 cites W2079430581 @default.
- W2009792901 cites W2083504878 @default.
- W2009792901 cites W2226341614 @default.
- W2009792901 cites W2523944568 @default.
- W2009792901 cites W2800334228 @default.
- W2009792901 cites W595481666 @default.
- W2009792901 cites W606860515 @default.
- W2009792901 cites W620887610 @default.
- W2009792901 cites W651209961 @default.
- W2009792901 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/jjq.2008.0013" @default.
- W2009792901 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
- W2009792901 type Work @default.
- W2009792901 sameAs 2009792901 @default.
- W2009792901 citedByCount "4" @default.
- W2009792901 countsByYear W20097929012013 @default.
- W2009792901 countsByYear W20097929012015 @default.
- W2009792901 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2009792901 hasAuthorship W2009792901A5050489933 @default.
- W2009792901 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
- W2009792901 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W2009792901 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
- W2009792901 hasConcept C74916050 @default.
- W2009792901 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
- W2009792901 hasConceptScore W2009792901C124952713 @default.
- W2009792901 hasConceptScore W2009792901C138885662 @default.
- W2009792901 hasConceptScore W2009792901C142362112 @default.
- W2009792901 hasConceptScore W2009792901C74916050 @default.
- W2009792901 hasConceptScore W2009792901C95457728 @default.
- W2009792901 hasIssue "3" @default.
- W2009792901 hasLocation W20097929011 @default.
- W2009792901 hasOpenAccess W2009792901 @default.
- W2009792901 hasPrimaryLocation W20097929011 @default.
- W2009792901 hasRelatedWork W1030430500 @default.
- W2009792901 hasRelatedWork W1494974852 @default.
- W2009792901 hasRelatedWork W2227612306 @default.
- W2009792901 hasRelatedWork W2322093317 @default.
- W2009792901 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
- W2009792901 hasRelatedWork W2803307177 @default.
- W2009792901 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
- W2009792901 hasRelatedWork W2912137438 @default.
- W2009792901 hasRelatedWork W3176134636 @default.
- W2009792901 hasRelatedWork W4252650152 @default.
- W2009792901 hasVolume "44" @default.
- W2009792901 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2009792901 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2009792901 magId "2009792901" @default.
- W2009792901 workType "article" @default.