FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2009964622> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2009964622 endingPage "883" @default.
• W2009964622 startingPage "876" @default.
• W2009964622 abstract "Objective The Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) is a common screening measure for late-life depression, but it does not directly assess thoughts of death or suicide. The present study asked whether 30-item (GDS) and 15-item (GDS–SF) GDS scales differentiate older adults with high versus low levels of suicidal ideation. Methods This cross-sectional study included a sample of 105 adults age 65 or older recruited from medical and psychiatric inpatient and outpatient practices, nursing and retirement residences, and community-based seniors' programs. Results GDS scores were associated positively with self-report and clinician-administered measures of suicidal ideation. Fifteen of 30 GDS items and 7 of 15 GDS–SF items distinguished groups high or low in self-reported suicidal ideation. Receiver Operating Characteristic curve analyses indicated criterion validity for the GDS measures with respect to suicidal ideation at cut-off scores of 12 for the GDS and 6 for the GDS–SF. Five internally consistent GDS items were identified that were highly associated with suicidal ideation, assessing hopelessness, worthlessness, emptiness, an absence of happiness, and absence of the perception that it is “wonderful to be alive.” Conclusion Long and short forms of the GDS may be used to screen older patients at risk for suicide. Clinicians using the GDS for this purpose are advised to further assess suicide risk with measures designed specifically to assess presence and severity of suicidal ideation. The Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) is a common screening measure for late-life depression, but it does not directly assess thoughts of death or suicide. The present study asked whether 30-item (GDS) and 15-item (GDS–SF) GDS scales differentiate older adults with high versus low levels of suicidal ideation. This cross-sectional study included a sample of 105 adults age 65 or older recruited from medical and psychiatric inpatient and outpatient practices, nursing and retirement residences, and community-based seniors' programs. GDS scores were associated positively with self-report and clinician-administered measures of suicidal ideation. Fifteen of 30 GDS items and 7 of 15 GDS–SF items distinguished groups high or low in self-reported suicidal ideation. Receiver Operating Characteristic curve analyses indicated criterion validity for the GDS measures with respect to suicidal ideation at cut-off scores of 12 for the GDS and 6 for the GDS–SF. Five internally consistent GDS items were identified that were highly associated with suicidal ideation, assessing hopelessness, worthlessness, emptiness, an absence of happiness, and absence of the perception that it is “wonderful to be alive.” Long and short forms of the GDS may be used to screen older patients at risk for suicide. Clinicians using the GDS for this purpose are advised to further assess suicide risk with measures designed specifically to assess presence and severity of suicidal ideation." @default.
• W2009964622 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2009964622 creator A5039847179 @default.
• W2009964622 creator A5041318688 @default.
• W2009964622 creator A5055639228 @default.
• W2009964622 creator A5062862337 @default.
• W2009964622 date "2005-10-01" @default.
• W2009964622 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2009964622 title "Does the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) Distinguish Between Older Adults With High Versus Low Levels of Suicidal Ideation?" @default.
• W2009964622 cites W1494289319 @default.
• W2009964622 cites W1544359545 @default.
• W2009964622 cites W1554054216 @default.
• W2009964622 cites W1572045941 @default.
• W2009964622 cites W1592734300 @default.
• W2009964622 cites W183077698 @default.
• W2009964622 cites W187401931 @default.
• W2009964622 cites W1974047818 @default.
• W2009964622 cites W1989975854 @default.
• W2009964622 cites W1990369310 @default.
• W2009964622 cites W2001261200 @default.
• W2009964622 cites W2025242480 @default.
• W2009964622 cites W2025265762 @default.
• W2009964622 cites W2030453313 @default.
• W2009964622 cites W2039664444 @default.
• W2009964622 cites W2048662337 @default.
• W2009964622 cites W2051022430 @default.
• W2009964622 cites W2089853870 @default.
• W2009964622 cites W2091457171 @default.
• W2009964622 cites W2112519660 @default.
• W2009964622 cites W2119981100 @default.
• W2009964622 cites W2121178934 @default.
• W2009964622 cites W2134976022 @default.
• W2009964622 cites W2162204584 @default.
• W2009964622 cites W2247389403 @default.
• W2009964622 cites W613953456 @default.
• W2009964622 cites W2044145227 @default.
• W2009964622 cites W2299172499 @default.
• W2009964622 doi "https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajgp.13.10.876" @default.
• W2009964622 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16223966" @default.
• W2009964622 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
• W2009964622 type Work @default.
• W2009964622 sameAs 2009964622 @default.
• W2009964622 citedByCount "29" @default.
• W2009964622 countsByYear W20099646222013 @default.
• W2009964622 countsByYear W20099646222014 @default.
• W2009964622 countsByYear W20099646222016 @default.
• W2009964622 countsByYear W20099646222018 @default.
• W2009964622 countsByYear W20099646222019 @default.
• W2009964622 countsByYear W20099646222020 @default.
• W2009964622 countsByYear W20099646222022 @default.
• W2009964622 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2009964622 hasAuthorship W2009964622A5039847179 @default.
• W2009964622 hasAuthorship W2009964622A5041318688 @default.
• W2009964622 hasAuthorship W2009964622A5055639228 @default.
• W2009964622 hasAuthorship W2009964622A5062862337 @default.
• W2009964622 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W2009964622 hasConcept C139719470 @default.
• W2009964622 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2009964622 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2009964622 hasConcept C2776641880 @default.
• W2009964622 hasConcept C2776760841 @default.
• W2009964622 hasConcept C2776867660 @default.
• W2009964622 hasConcept C3017944768 @default.
• W2009964622 hasConcept C3019858935 @default.
• W2009964622 hasConcept C526869908 @default.
• W2009964622 hasConcept C545542383 @default.
• W2009964622 hasConcept C558461103 @default.
• W2009964622 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W2009964622 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2009964622 hasConcept C74909509 @default.
• W2009964622 hasConceptScore W2009964622C118552586 @default.
• W2009964622 hasConceptScore W2009964622C139719470 @default.
• W2009964622 hasConceptScore W2009964622C15744967 @default.
• W2009964622 hasConceptScore W2009964622C162324750 @default.
• W2009964622 hasConceptScore W2009964622C2776641880 @default.
• W2009964622 hasConceptScore W2009964622C2776760841 @default.
• W2009964622 hasConceptScore W2009964622C2776867660 @default.
• W2009964622 hasConceptScore W2009964622C3017944768 @default.
• W2009964622 hasConceptScore W2009964622C3019858935 @default.
• W2009964622 hasConceptScore W2009964622C526869908 @default.
• W2009964622 hasConceptScore W2009964622C545542383 @default.
• W2009964622 hasConceptScore W2009964622C558461103 @default.
• W2009964622 hasConceptScore W2009964622C70410870 @default.
• W2009964622 hasConceptScore W2009964622C71924100 @default.
• W2009964622 hasConceptScore W2009964622C74909509 @default.
• W2009964622 hasIssue "10" @default.
• W2009964622 hasLocation W20099646221 @default.
• W2009964622 hasLocation W20099646222 @default.
• W2009964622 hasOpenAccess W2009964622 @default.
• W2009964622 hasPrimaryLocation W20099646221 @default.
• W2009964622 hasRelatedWork W1964307545 @default.
• W2009964622 hasRelatedWork W1977630765 @default.
• W2009964622 hasRelatedWork W2015499868 @default.
• W2009964622 hasRelatedWork W2018088591 @default.
• W2009964622 hasRelatedWork W2061752178 @default.
• W2009964622 hasRelatedWork W2115770815 @default.
• W2009964622 hasRelatedWork W2140168657 @default.
• W2009964622 hasRelatedWork W2167188781 @default.

• next