FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2010027621> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2010027621 endingPage "353" @default.
• W2010027621 startingPage "345" @default.
• W2010027621 abstract "The risk of wind damage was assessed for Sitka spruce growing in the Border Forest Park, Great Britain and radiata pine growing in the Central North Island, New Zealand using a quantitative wind risk model (FORESTGALES). The model has been adapted for the two species using estimates of maximum resistive bending moment from historical tree winching studies performed in the two regions, drag coefficients obtained from wind tunnel tests, and wind data from representative meteorological stations. The risk is calculated as the probability that the threshold wind speed for damage will be exceeded at a particular site. This approach enables the effect of different growth rates, soil types, management regimes and wind climates to be investigated. The threshold wind speed for tree failure was calculated for stands of both species grown under standard regimes on typical soils and characteristic topography. The probability that the threshold wind speed is exceeded was determined using a recurrence function fitted to time-series of annual maximum hourly wind speeds from a representative long-term meteorological station for each region. The two species are grown over substantially different rotation lengths, so comparisons were made between the profile of risk over a single rotation, and also as cumulative risk over a time-span sufficient to contain multiple rotations. The results demonstrate substantial differences in the probability of wind damage between forests in the two regions as they are currently managed. Contrary to expectation, the risk is lowest for forests in the region of the most severe wind climate, because of the selection of a risk-minimising strategy. This finding emphasises the degree to which management of forests can affect the frequency and amount of damage that they experience. The model was portable and provided objective estimates of risk for two very different locations and silvicultural regimes. Further development should provide a tool of practical importance for those seeking to make comparisons between very different situations, such as multi-national companies and re-insurers." @default.
• W2010027621 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2010027621 creator A5007705515 @default.
• W2010027621 creator A5022441940 @default.
• W2010027621 date "2000-09-01" @default.
• W2010027621 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2010027621 title "A comparison of the relative risk of wind damage to planted forests in Border Forest Park, Great Britain, and the Central North Island, New Zealand" @default.
• W2010027621 cites W1644496006 @default.
• W2010027621 cites W1978547079 @default.
• W2010027621 cites W2000054807 @default.
• W2010027621 cites W2007830877 @default.
• W2010027621 cites W2030731670 @default.
• W2010027621 cites W2946357546 @default.
• W2010027621 cites W2989830855 @default.
• W2010027621 cites W2990030579 @default.
• W2010027621 cites W4232683509 @default.
• W2010027621 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-1127(00)00292-9" @default.
• W2010027621 hasPublicationYear "2000" @default.
• W2010027621 type Work @default.
• W2010027621 sameAs 2010027621 @default.
• W2010027621 citedByCount "31" @default.
• W2010027621 countsByYear W20100276212012 @default.
• W2010027621 countsByYear W20100276212013 @default.
• W2010027621 countsByYear W20100276212014 @default.
• W2010027621 countsByYear W20100276212015 @default.
• W2010027621 countsByYear W20100276212016 @default.
• W2010027621 countsByYear W20100276212020 @default.
• W2010027621 countsByYear W20100276212022 @default.
• W2010027621 countsByYear W20100276212023 @default.
• W2010027621 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2010027621 hasAuthorship W2010027621A5007705515 @default.
• W2010027621 hasAuthorship W2010027621A5022441940 @default.
• W2010027621 hasConcept C100970517 @default.
• W2010027621 hasConcept C127313418 @default.
• W2010027621 hasConcept C153294291 @default.
• W2010027621 hasConcept C161067210 @default.
• W2010027621 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W2010027621 hasConcept C39432304 @default.
• W2010027621 hasConcept C91586092 @default.
• W2010027621 hasConceptScore W2010027621C100970517 @default.
• W2010027621 hasConceptScore W2010027621C127313418 @default.
• W2010027621 hasConceptScore W2010027621C153294291 @default.
• W2010027621 hasConceptScore W2010027621C161067210 @default.
• W2010027621 hasConceptScore W2010027621C205649164 @default.
• W2010027621 hasConceptScore W2010027621C39432304 @default.
• W2010027621 hasConceptScore W2010027621C91586092 @default.
• W2010027621 hasIssue "1-3" @default.
• W2010027621 hasLocation W20100276211 @default.
• W2010027621 hasOpenAccess W2010027621 @default.
• W2010027621 hasPrimaryLocation W20100276211 @default.
• W2010027621 hasRelatedWork W1567775150 @default.
• W2010027621 hasRelatedWork W2018410291 @default.
• W2010027621 hasRelatedWork W2069562338 @default.
• W2010027621 hasRelatedWork W2348064372 @default.
• W2010027621 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2010027621 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2010027621 hasRelatedWork W3199069701 @default.
• W2010027621 hasRelatedWork W4224223762 @default.
• W2010027621 hasRelatedWork W4283017276 @default.
• W2010027621 hasRelatedWork W4285220841 @default.
• W2010027621 hasVolume "135" @default.
• W2010027621 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2010027621 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2010027621 magId "2010027621" @default.
• W2010027621 workType "article" @default.