FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2010069673> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2010069673 abstract "The aim of this study is to compare mammographic breast density assessment with automated volumetric software with Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS) categorization by radiologists on two imaging systems. A data set of 120 mammograms was classified by twenty American Board of Radiology (ABR) Examiners. The mammograms were of 20 women (mean age, 60 years; range, 42–89 years). These women were image twice one year apart either on GE system or Hologic system. These images also had their volumetric density classified by using Volpara Density Grade (VDG). The radiologists were asked to estimate the mammographic density according to BIRADS categories (1-4). There was a moderate agreement between VDG classification and radiologist BIRADS density shown with Cohen’s Kappa (κ=0.45; p<0.001). Radiologists estimated percentage density to be lower by an average of 0.37 for the Hologic system, the radiologist’s BIRADS having a mean of 2.05 and the mean VDG higher at 2.42(t= -8.88; p<0.001). VDG and radiologist’s BIRADS showed a positive strong correlation (r=0.87; p<0.001). Radiologist BIRADS and VDG AvBD% also showed a strong positive correlation (r=0.86; p<0.001). There was a large spread of radiologist’s BIRADS categories for each of the VDG AvBD% classifications. Using Volpara, the Hologic system showed a lower mean AvBD% (9.5 vs. 9.6). However using BIRADS the Hologic systems showed a lower mean (2.05 vs. 2.22). Automated systems demonstrated higher internal validity. The results demonstrated a moderate agreement and a strong correlation between VDG classification and radiologist BIRADS density assessment. Publisher’s Note: This paper, originally published on 3/11/14, was replaced with a corrected/revised version on 8/1/14. If you downloaded the original PDF but are unable to access the revision, please contact SPIE Digital Library Customer Service for assistance." @default.
• W2010069673 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2010069673 creator A5003845997 @default.
• W2010069673 creator A5061354688 @default.
• W2010069673 date "2014-03-11" @default.
• W2010069673 modified "2023-10-12" @default.
• W2010069673 title "Mammographic density measurement: a comparison of automated volumetric density measurement to BIRADS" @default.
• W2010069673 cites W1989829869 @default.
• W2010069673 cites W1998762923 @default.
• W2010069673 cites W2025588037 @default.
• W2010069673 cites W2041704199 @default.
• W2010069673 cites W2050777812 @default.
• W2010069673 cites W2079966654 @default.
• W2010069673 cites W2087599206 @default.
• W2010069673 cites W2100159406 @default.
• W2010069673 cites W2111198437 @default.
• W2010069673 cites W2120805174 @default.
• W2010069673 cites W2124812493 @default.
• W2010069673 cites W2150242770 @default.
• W2010069673 doi "https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2042966" @default.
• W2010069673 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2010069673 type Work @default.
• W2010069673 sameAs 2010069673 @default.
• W2010069673 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W2010069673 countsByYear W20100696732014 @default.
• W2010069673 countsByYear W20100696732015 @default.
• W2010069673 countsByYear W20100696732022 @default.
• W2010069673 crossrefType "proceedings-article" @default.
• W2010069673 hasAuthorship W2010069673A5003845997 @default.
• W2010069673 hasAuthorship W2010069673A5061354688 @default.
• W2010069673 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2010069673 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2010069673 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2010069673 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W2010069673 hasConcept C2777432617 @default.
• W2010069673 hasConcept C2778724333 @default.
• W2010069673 hasConcept C2780472235 @default.
• W2010069673 hasConcept C2909213482 @default.
• W2010069673 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W2010069673 hasConcept C3018951153 @default.
• W2010069673 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2010069673 hasConcept C530470458 @default.
• W2010069673 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2010069673 hasConceptScore W2010069673C121608353 @default.
• W2010069673 hasConceptScore W2010069673C126322002 @default.
• W2010069673 hasConceptScore W2010069673C126838900 @default.
• W2010069673 hasConceptScore W2010069673C2524010 @default.
• W2010069673 hasConceptScore W2010069673C2777432617 @default.
• W2010069673 hasConceptScore W2010069673C2778724333 @default.
• W2010069673 hasConceptScore W2010069673C2780472235 @default.
• W2010069673 hasConceptScore W2010069673C2909213482 @default.
• W2010069673 hasConceptScore W2010069673C2989005 @default.
• W2010069673 hasConceptScore W2010069673C3018951153 @default.
• W2010069673 hasConceptScore W2010069673C33923547 @default.
• W2010069673 hasConceptScore W2010069673C530470458 @default.
• W2010069673 hasConceptScore W2010069673C71924100 @default.
• W2010069673 hasLocation W20100696731 @default.
• W2010069673 hasOpenAccess W2010069673 @default.
• W2010069673 hasPrimaryLocation W20100696731 @default.
• W2010069673 hasRelatedWork W1974266143 @default.
• W2010069673 hasRelatedWork W1989829869 @default.
• W2010069673 hasRelatedWork W2010069673 @default.
• W2010069673 hasRelatedWork W2091949623 @default.
• W2010069673 hasRelatedWork W2154027915 @default.
• W2010069673 hasRelatedWork W2167363078 @default.
• W2010069673 hasRelatedWork W2621162536 @default.
• W2010069673 hasRelatedWork W3012112151 @default.
• W2010069673 hasRelatedWork W4220946250 @default.
• W2010069673 hasRelatedWork W2122927109 @default.
• W2010069673 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2010069673 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2010069673 magId "2010069673" @default.
• W2010069673 workType "article" @default.