FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2010254695> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2010254695 endingPage "433" @default.
• W2010254695 startingPage "431" @default.
• W2010254695 abstract "When I was selected to be the sixth editor of Family Process in 2004, I made a commitment to an initiative I named “New Voices.” Dedicated to the publication of articles by younger colleagues who were publishing in Family Process for the first time, and peer-reviewed with the same rigor as all our manuscripts, “New Voices” attracted young researchers, theorists, and clinicians. Over the 8 years of my editorship, we published “New Voice” articles on a wide range of contemporary topics – Latino families, transnationalism, bi-racial adoptees, homosexuality, the integration of sex and couples therapy, gender and power, couples, affairs and attachment, the impact of cancer on families. As I had hoped, the articles included quantitative and qualitative research, theory and practice, and case studies. Written voices included the academic third person, and the more personal first person. And as I had called for in my first editorial (Imber-Black, 2004), the articles had received careful mentoring, “in order to provide a map of the world of excellent journal writing and publishing” (Imber-Black, 2004 p. 3). Coming full circle to the completion of my editorship, I am very proud to offer this special issue, “The Next Generation.” The collection of papers includes six by the generation coming up, two by seasoned teachers and trainers, and one literary essay. The manuscripts by younger colleagues include a multi-dimensional panorama of our field. The selections herein are intended not to be exhaustive, but rather to suggest some of the possibilities for today and tomorrow. The issue is intended both to inform all and to inspire more submissions from the new generation. The journal's commitment to discovering models of excellent public sector practice is evident in the opening essay by Catherine Lewis, “Providing Therapy to Children and Families in Foster Care” (Lewis, 2011). Taking on one of the remarkably intractable multi-systemic dilemmas of our time, and creatively integrating structural and postmodern therapies, Lewis offers a road map for front-line family therapists, one that is capable of untangling the webs that trap our most vulnerable children and families. Complementing Lewis's article is William Madsen's training contribution, “Collaborative Helping Maps: A Tool to Guide Thinking and Action in Family-Centered Services” (Madsen, 2011). Keeping front-line workers and those they serve in the forefront of his thinking, Madsen helps us imagine service delivery marked by resilient practice and cooperative relationships capable of maintaining a new generation in community practice, dedicated to remaining with those most in need. Two mixed methods research articles further evidence-informed work for both practice and training. The first is from a group of new researchers and their mentor (Morrill et al., 2011) describing and providing a preliminary evaluation of a method to proffer necessary attention to couples unlikely to go for couples therapy. The second is from a highly experienced group of teachers (le Roux, Podgorski, Rosenberg, Watson, & McDaniel, 2011) concerned with the competencies of the next generation and offering a powerful assessment method in Family Therapy training. Addressing very different contexts, each article, nonetheless, illustrates how the interaction of new challenges and the research arena can lead to original theory and practice. The next generation's careful attention to society's previously unacknowledged or hidden is brought to sparkling light in Jean Malpas's (2011) creative approaches to children and their families in “Between Pink and Blue: A Multi-Dimensional Family Approach to Gender Nonconforming Children and Their Families.” This article is a cogent reminder that the next generation will lead us to previously ignored family and community imperatives. Two first person reflective essays draw our consideration to multiple levels of power, its uses and misuses, and the courage required not only to persevere, but to enable self and others to thrive. In “A Participatory Approach to Healing and Transformation in South Africa,” Elize Morkel (2011) takes us on her personal journey confronting violence, sexism, and racism in post-apartheid South Africa. In so doing, she enables us to envision non-traditional approaches in our own contexts. Markham and Chiu (2011), in “Exposing Operations of Power in Supervisory Relationships,” utilize poststructural theory to simultaneously examine their own experiences as learners while offering crucial reminders to teachers of the power we hold and how to exercise it responsibly and well in the service of generativity. Contributing to a many decades old theoretical and practice debate about approaches to infidelity in Couple Therapy, Kirstee Williams offers a fresh overture in “A Socio-Emotional Relational Framework for Infidelity: The Relational Justice Approach” (Williams, 2011). Placing infidelity in a social context of gender and power, Williams offers an ethical direction based on mutuality and justice. Her work melds the complexities of personal responsibility in relationships with often unattended social influences. This special issue ends with a literary essay by Victoria Dickerson (Dickerson, 2011). When I began my editorship, the Literary Essay was another initiative I created with the hope that such works would enable readers to make invigorating connections among sometimes disparate works. In her essay “Insider Knowledge,” Dickerson innovatively addresses the synergy of a film, a novel, and a new work on Narrative Therapy. She brings to our attention the responsibilities we have to enable and enhance “voice” and “visibility” for the next generation. I hope you will find this special issue as exciting as I do. Serving as editor of Family Process for the past 8 years has been one of the treasures of my professional life. The trust to shepherd new knowledge is one I have held with a profound sense of gratitude. I deeply thank our readers; our talented contributors; our dedicated advisory editors who serve with generosity; the committed Family Process Institute officers and board, under the leadership, first of Betsy Wood, and subsequently of Nadine Kaslow; my associate editors – Guillermo Bernal, Associate Editor for Research, Anne Bernstein, Associate Editor for the Web, and Janine Roberts, Associate Editor for International Scholarship; our purposeful and uniformly sustaining team at Wiley-Blackwell Publishers, especially Margaret Zusky, Jill Yablonski, and Ben Hogan; our rigorous proofreader, Shay Wainwright; my exceptional editorial assistant, Marie Mele; my colleagues at the Ackerman Institute for the Family and Mercy College; my husband, Lascelles Black; and my five cats for supporting my editorship these past 8 years. As with “New Voice” articles, many of the articles in this collection had dedicated mentorship. When the call went out for “Next Generation” papers, many senior researchers, theorists, and practitioners, with full awareness that not all papers would ultimately be accepted, worked to guide younger colleagues. I thank everyone for their generosity of time and knowledge. Special thanks to Ellen Berman, James Cördova, Victoria Dickerson, Carmen Knudson-Martin, David Marsten, William Pinsof, Kaethe Weingarten, Duncan Wigg, and Betsy Wood." @default.
• W2010254695 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2010254695 creator A5057728053 @default.
• W2010254695 date "2011-12-01" @default.
• W2010254695 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2010254695 title "Learning From and Teaching the Next Generation" @default.
• W2010254695 cites W1971497652 @default.
• W2010254695 cites W2003764761 @default.
• W2010254695 cites W2034690406 @default.
• W2010254695 cites W2044789925 @default.
• W2010254695 cites W2059235969 @default.
• W2010254695 cites W2082941613 @default.
• W2010254695 cites W2102175810 @default.
• W2010254695 cites W2131620960 @default.
• W2010254695 cites W2163490900 @default.
• W2010254695 cites W4247330345 @default.
• W2010254695 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2011.01377.x" @default.
• W2010254695 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22145716" @default.
• W2010254695 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2010254695 type Work @default.
• W2010254695 sameAs 2010254695 @default.
• W2010254695 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2010254695 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2010254695 hasAuthorship W2010254695A5057728053 @default.
• W2010254695 hasBestOaLocation W20102546951 @default.
• W2010254695 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2010254695 hasConceptScore W2010254695C15744967 @default.
• W2010254695 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2010254695 hasLocation W20102546951 @default.
• W2010254695 hasLocation W20102546952 @default.
• W2010254695 hasOpenAccess W2010254695 @default.
• W2010254695 hasPrimaryLocation W20102546951 @default.
• W2010254695 hasRelatedWork W1710126152 @default.
• W2010254695 hasRelatedWork W2053487507 @default.
• W2010254695 hasRelatedWork W2077865380 @default.
• W2010254695 hasRelatedWork W2134894512 @default.
• W2010254695 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2010254695 hasRelatedWork W2765597752 @default.
• W2010254695 hasRelatedWork W2789488587 @default.
• W2010254695 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2010254695 hasRelatedWork W2931662336 @default.
• W2010254695 hasRelatedWork W2958642381 @default.
• W2010254695 hasVolume "50" @default.
• W2010254695 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2010254695 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2010254695 magId "2010254695" @default.
• W2010254695 workType "article" @default.