FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2010406404> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2010406404 endingPage "74" @default.
• W2010406404 startingPage "67" @default.
• W2010406404 abstract "Keywords: assurance; sustainable development; social reporting; social verification. In this paper, I share with you the recent experiences of the Shell Group with sustainability reporting. The full story about Shell's commitment to contribute to sustainable development and what we did to add substance to that commitment has become quite long because we have been really active over the last three years. Therefore, I have to go through it with gigantic steps. In fact, I will disregard most of my standard presentation and concentrate on the reporting and verification aspects and, in particular, on the social verification that is, by anybody's standard, the most complex issue in sustainable development reporting. I will not address environmental verification; suffice it to say that we have made important progress in that area as well. The topics I discuss are the following: context and content, why reporting, some general and verification experiences, and some of the issues and features that will emerge over the next couple of years. CONTEXT AND CONTENT One publicly stated objective of The Shell Report(1) is that eventually it aims to evolve into the Shell annual report including the full financial report, as well as reports on the environmental and social performance of the Shell Group, hopefully in a fully integrated manner. There is still a long way to go, but that is the long-term aspiration. However, for the immediate future we have decided to focus on sustainable development and to try to report openly and honestly on the impact of our activities on and our performance in the three dimensions of sustainable development: economic, environmental, and social. In practice, there is an emphasis on the latter two. One feature has been that The Shell Report, from day one, does contain verified information that conventionally has not been verified. The first report was Profit and Principles: Does There Have To Be A Choice. This document caused a bit of a stir within and outside the corporate world because it followed an approach and contained material that no multinational company had ever presented before. In it we published a road map in which we set out our over time and positioned them within the concept of sustainable development. That is to say it identified and highlighted the three dimensions of sustainable development. However, it also began to focus on the individual components of social accounting and reporting, e.g., stakeholder engagement processes, standards, and verification. Essentially, the central context was the question does one translate this difficult and abstract concept into day-to-day reality in the business? To provide an overview of The Shell Report 2000, do we stand? People, Planet & Profits, Table 1 contains a summary of the content of the report. As can be seen, the report focuses on reporting various aspects of sustainable development and provides evidence and documents the actions we have taken in 1999 in striving to meet our commitments (The Shell Report 2000, 1). In particular, note that page 5 contains the independent report of the verifier. TABLE 1 Contents of The Shell Report 2000 Topic Pages Details Message from the Chairman 2-3 The chairman's perspective on where we stand on sustainable development and how we measure up against our targets. Transparency 4-5 We explain transparency and techniques to improve credibility. The independent report of our verifiers can be found here. Why sustainable development? 6-7 Look here for what sustainable development means to us. Economic 8-13 How do we perform financially? …" @default.
• W2010406404 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2010406404 creator A5068042577 @default.
• W2010406404 date "2000-10-01" @default.
• W2010406404 modified "2023-10-05" @default.
• W2010406404 title "Reporting on Sustainable Development: A Preparer's View" @default.
• W2010406404 cites W2114669757 @default.
• W2010406404 doi "https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2000.19.s-1.67" @default.
• W2010406404 hasPublicationYear "2000" @default.
• W2010406404 type Work @default.
• W2010406404 sameAs 2010406404 @default.
• W2010406404 citedByCount "8" @default.
• W2010406404 countsByYear W20104064042012 @default.
• W2010406404 countsByYear W20104064042013 @default.
• W2010406404 countsByYear W20104064042014 @default.
• W2010406404 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2010406404 hasAuthorship W2010406404A5068042577 @default.
• W2010406404 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2010406404 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2010406404 hasConcept C195094911 @default.
• W2010406404 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2010406404 hasConcept C552854447 @default.
• W2010406404 hasConceptScore W2010406404C144133560 @default.
• W2010406404 hasConceptScore W2010406404C17744445 @default.
• W2010406404 hasConceptScore W2010406404C195094911 @default.
• W2010406404 hasConceptScore W2010406404C199539241 @default.
• W2010406404 hasConceptScore W2010406404C552854447 @default.
• W2010406404 hasIssue "s-1" @default.
• W2010406404 hasLocation W20104064041 @default.
• W2010406404 hasOpenAccess W2010406404 @default.
• W2010406404 hasPrimaryLocation W20104064041 @default.
• W2010406404 hasRelatedWork W2345605676 @default.
• W2010406404 hasRelatedWork W2356797160 @default.
• W2010406404 hasRelatedWork W2368044223 @default.
• W2010406404 hasRelatedWork W2368602501 @default.
• W2010406404 hasRelatedWork W2386737196 @default.
• W2010406404 hasRelatedWork W2389458656 @default.
• W2010406404 hasRelatedWork W2390881992 @default.
• W2010406404 hasRelatedWork W2991301039 @default.
• W2010406404 hasRelatedWork W3155223804 @default.
• W2010406404 hasRelatedWork W4280523403 @default.
• W2010406404 hasVolume "19" @default.
• W2010406404 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2010406404 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2010406404 magId "2010406404" @default.
• W2010406404 workType "article" @default.